TPMDC
« TPMDC Sunday Roundup | Home | KY Lt. Gov. Will Challenge Sen. Jim Bunning In 2010 »

TPMDC Morning Roundup

Obama Set To Allow Tighter Emissions Standards By States
President Obama is expected today to clear the way for allowing California and other states to set their own emissions standards, something that the Bush Administration had previously blocked. Federal regulators are expected to formally approve the changes, which will then force car manufacturers to increase the efficiencies of their vehicles in order to sell their products in major states.

Obama Speaking On Economy This Morning
President Obama will be speaking from the White House today on the subject of the economy, at 10:30 a.m. ET. Vice President Biden will also be joining Obama at today's briefings and meetings.

Minnesota Election Trial Begins Today
The Minnesota Senate litigation enters a new phase today, with the trial beginning at 2 p.m. ET in St. Paul. Norm Coleman's legal team will have the opportunity to go first, calling witnesses and laying out their case that he, and not Al Franken, was the true winner of this super-tight race. A video feed will be available at The Uptake.

Blago Impeachment Trial Beginning Today, Minus Blago
The Illinois state Senate is set to begin the impeachment trial of Gov. Rod Blagojevich today, though Blago himself is boycotting the proceedings. Instead, Blago is set to appear on the TV talk circuit, making his case that he is innocent and that the trial is rigged against him.

Blago: I Thought About Appointing Oprah To Senate
Rod Blagojevich told ABC News that he had considered appointing Oprah Winfrey to Barack Obama's former Senate seat. But Blago says he didn't do so because it would make too much of a commotion: "she probably wouldn't take it, and then if you offered it to her, how would you do it in a way it wasn't a gimmick to embarrass her."

Cornyn To GOP: Forget The House, Give For The Senate
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), as head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, confirmed to Roll Call that he is recruiting potential candidates and courting donors by disparaging the status and comparatively limited power of the House GOP. "I would love to get a Republican majority in the House, I just don't think it's feasible this cycle," said Cornyn, describing the House campaign committee and himself as "friendly competitors."

Feingold To Introduce Amendment Banning Senate Appointments
Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) has announced that he will introduce a constitutional amendment to end gubernatorial appointments to Senate vacancies, instead requiring special elections as is done in several states including Wisconsin. Said Feingold, in a statement: "The controversies surrounding some of the recent gubernatorial appointments to vacant Senate seats make it painfully clear that such appointments are an anachronism that must end."

Clyburn: No Health Bill In 2009
In an interview on C-Span this past weekend, House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-SC) said that it's unlikely a comprehensive health care bill will pass the Congress this year, with a slower approach being more feasible. "I would much rather see it done that way, incrementally, than to go out and just bite something you can't chew," said Clyburn. "We've been down that road. I still remember 1994."


41 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Way to go Russ!! Some days it's great to be from Wisconsin (even when it's 2 below).

user-pic

God, Blago is starting to remind of of that phase in the Brittany Spears meltdown when it stopped being entertaining because it was clear she was mentally ill.

user-pic

Yep, it actually is kind of sad. He has totally lost touch with reality. The question is how on earth did this buffoon get elected in the first place? It's kind of scary when you think about it.

user-pic

I liked how he compared himself to Ghandi and Mandela. That was a hoot.

user-pic

Although after everything that's happened, it wouldn't seem too surprising to see him shave his head and start walking around without undies.

user-pic

Yes, it's time for him to shave his head and start smashing vehicles with umbrellas. As Jon Stewart has wondered, what exactly IS written on his forehead?

user-pic

This sounds nice in the abstract, but special elections are extremely expensive. Estimates for one in Illinois ran to about $50 million, and that's piggybacking on existing municipal elections in the spring. A stand-alone special election would be even more expensive.

Also, what if there's only six months left in the term? Do you have a special election to fill that vacancy? No? How about nine months? A year? Obviously there is some time where a special election makes no sense, but how long?

In cases where a special election is not justified, how about having the new Senator chosen by the legislature instead of the governor?

user-pic

Yeah, I kind of agree with you here. Looks good on paper, but the realities on the ground are much more complicated. (Not that I'm a fan of the appointment process, either.)

user-pic

I say 2009 IS the year to pass a health bill. Clyburn needs to rethink his position.

user-pic

Agreed. I think clyburn is in the lowering expectations spin mode by the way. I bet it happens sooner than we all think, which still won't be soon enough. Fixing healthcare will be a huge step in fixing the economy. I can hear the speech already for universal, single payer with the "titans" of industry as a backdrop from the big three to walmart. They want it and we want it and the healthcare industry wants it. The only bozos who don't are the criminal insurance industry and they don't have that many votes and they can't buy obama.

user-pic

That is my thought as well. Bill Clinton tried the incremental approach and look where it got us; nowhere. I hope that Pres Obama is not paying much heed to Rep Clyburn on this point.

user-pic

Obama Appoints Benjamin Button To Oversee Reversal of Bush/Cheney Policies
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=5778

user-pic
Blago: I Thought About Appointing Oprah To Senate
This guy never fails to come up with something good. Was he thinking this would help his side (like, if it went to Oprah then it wasn't being sold to a nobody?), or is he trying to make the impeachment go easier?
user-pic

This just in: Bozo no longer the World's Most Famous Clown!

user-pic

Oh good grief:
Blago: I Thought About Appointing Oprah To Senate
[ . . . ]
"The controversies surrounding some of the recent gubernatorial appointments to vacant Senate seats make it painfully clear that such appointments are an anachronism that must end."

'nuff said . . .

user-pic

Blago will be on The View this morning, I think. Can't wait to see what headlines he makes today.

user-pic

Blago is playing this for an insanity plea and/or a book/movie deal down the line after he is booted from office.

It's all about saying outlandish things now for the publicity. If Sarah Palin is asking $11M for a book deal, he probably figures he could get $4-5M if he keeps acting crazy.

user-pic

Blago on The View is MUST SEE TV!

user-pic

I'm not sure I like the special election idea by Feingold, because it could put seats at risk an could stop the President from choosing folks if they could lose the seat.

On the other hand, it would also open up candidates such as Olympia Snowe, who wouldn't have thought of leaving to join the Obama Administration because her seat would have been filled by a Dem Governor.

So I guess it has good and bad fallout. Also who will pay for these special elections - the Feds or the State? Would cost then become an issue when deciding who to choose into ones cabinet?

user-pic

Since there's no guarantee in life why expect one in politics? The best odds you can get simply flipping a coin id 50:50 and elections have the same odds too. Let the voters decide for themselves and keep the Party political maneuvering by State officials at a minimum.

user-pic

If our Government is us, and we are our Government....with the exception of Obama, Russ Feingold, and a few choice others, we really are morons.

user-pic


I'm not sure I like the special election idea by Feingold, because it could put seats at risk an could stop the President from choosing folks if they could lose the seat.

I'm not sure she can do that. That's a state matter, not a federal matter, I thought.

user-pic

huh?

who is 'she'???

the constitution determines what are state matters and what are federal matters. if the constitution were amended to require vacancies be filled by special elections, then the manner in which vacancies are filled becomes a federal matter.

user-pic

Welcome home T!!!

:-)

user-pic

Not a fan of this idea of Feingold's. It would greatly reduce the pool of talent a new president can draw from. No president-elect with a bare majority in congress would feel that he could appoint congressional members of his own party without fear of losing majority control of the congress.

user-pic

how so??

a number of states already require special elections. in those states presidents already have to consider whether an appointee's seat is safe or vulnerable.

in states where vacancies are appointed presidents have to consider whether the governor of that state is of the same party (except in hawaii, utah, and wyoming where the appointee is chosen from three candidates chosen by the party of the prior incumbent).

overall, special elections are more likely to yield a replacement from the same party than are replacements apponted by governors since the odds of a district being favorable to the incumbent's party are better than the governor of a state being from the same party of any given district in that state.

user-pic

Frankly, I'm very excited about Feingold's amendment. I don't know why something similar wasn't already in place, but it's quite clear that allowing Governors to appoint people to the Senate causes too much malaise. The very fact that Blago was considering Oprah makes me support the amendment. Plus, the more democratic our system, the better. I'm sure the contention to some is that the Governor was elected by the people, so his appointment is, in a way, what the people chose. But that's like saying a rumor heard through the grapvine is true. You know part of it may be, but the majority of it is complete BS.

user-pic

Well, it may be a good idea, but I still don't think it's possible.

Elections are state matters. I don't think that handing over this function to the federal authorities is going to fly. I don't think states will let the feds take that over.

user-pic

But the 17th Amendment already interfered by allowing (though, admittedly, not requiring) for appointments by a state's Governor. I don't particularly see how this is a huge problem for "states rights".

user-pic

i think the point is that states might not be willing to ratify the amendment particularly since the requirement of special elections brings with it a not insignificant price tag.

and if states wanted to change to special elections, they could do that on their own without the feds telling them they had to.

user-pic

"Cornyn [...] confirmed to Roll Call that he is recruiting potential candidates and courting donors by disparaging the status and comparatively limited power of the House GOP. 'I would love to get a Republican majority in the House, I just don't think it's feasible this cycle,'" squawked the whiteheaded buzzard.

This means he's looking to pick up 10 Senate seats by 2010?! Whoa, no wonder they're trying to henpeck Obama, they've got a lot of smelly and messy nest-feathering to complete in under two short years!

user-pic

Well, I see comments now go through vetting here and over at Greg's new crib, even crap is bleeped automatically.

I hate to say it, but the internet is screwed. Comments boards are not the same and the internet is going completely mainstream and there goes all the creativity.

This makes me want to cry. 6 years I've been commenting and this what we've come to with regard to censorship.

Josh, shame on all of you for killing what we had.

user-pic

Really, we can't say "shit" & stuff? I'm noty usually a big one to use profanity myself & I don't like it when it's directed at other commenters, but I agree that this kind of vetting, er, censorship is a bad idea.

user-pic

Tena, my last comment came through instantly -- what are you talking about?

user-pic

Yeah. What the fuck's up with that shit?

user-pic

Word, for sure. Meanwhile, Tena, where have you been? As an SOP, takes some HTX to rev things up around here, IMHO!

user-pic

It's good to see your smilin' icon thingy, Tena. Missed you lots. I'm feeling good about the first hundred days so far, remaining cautiously optimistic.

The MN election trial starts here in about 30 minutes. Channel 4 just reported Coleman's legal team is trying to stall for more time using the "my battery went dead" defense. Franken's team saw it coming and sent tow trucks to give them jumps and hot chocolate.

Republican supporters then tried to stage a huge traffic jam to make the judges late, but their GPS devices froze and, since most have never been near the court house or the dangerous urban area known as Downtown St. Paul, they all ended up at Mall of America. It turned out alright in the end because Macy's extended their 60% off diamond jewelry sale through this week.

Today is going to be a fun day here at Norm's Humiliation Fest. I'll keep you posted...

user-pic

Today was William Kristol's last column in the NYTimes. Allen McDuffee discusses Kristol's final words. Will you miss Kristol?
http://www.governmentalityblog.com/my_weblog/2009/01/mondays-with-billy-the-last-one.html

user-pic

Is it me or Does Kristol look like Woddward? I always get them confused.

user-pic

God bless Obama for allowing states to set their own emissions' standards. The nation now looks to you, California, to use your dominant share of the American auto market to effect the sort of leadership that Washington D.C. is too timid to enact.

user-pic

Feingold's heading in the right direction with his mention of a proposed amendment. The people should always and only elect our Representatives. But I also believe the bigger problem is when the Judicial parts of our Government gets involved with our elections; like our Supreme Court did in 2000. At least the appointment opportunities by the Governors are based in law. Giving away the Presidency by a The Supreme Court is not. I am more interested in a Amending the Constitution to keep our American courts out of our American elections

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Elana
Schor

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address