RNC Chair Candidate Traces Political Beginnings To Opposing Busing
In the race for the RNC chair, it's becoming difficult to figure out which candidate is the most problematic in terms of party outreach to minority voters and adjusting to the political realities or our times.
The Politico reports that South Carolina GOP chairman Katon Dawson has publicly traced his political coming of age to the civil rights movement -- that is, opposition to 1960's busing policies. "Government reached into my life and grabbed me and shook me at the age of 15," Dawson told a University of South Carolina audience in 2003.
The star of this particular show has been Chip Saltsman, who sent out a CD to committee members containing a song called "Barack the Magic Negro." But some more attention is also being paid to Dawson, who has faced scrutiny for his membership in an all-white country club -- which he only resigned shortly before starting his current campaign. And now there's this, too.
















But for the repug national chair, lifelong opposition to civil rights is a feature, not a bug.
January 22, 2009 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but within their states, it could kill these guys if their histories are widely spread to the general population -- by which I mean black voters.
January 22, 2009 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Im in SC and let me tell you this place is a friggin vacuum. The National Dems dont do shit here. Most Ballots here have a few uncontested repubs every election. Dems could have gotten solicitor, coroner, state house and senate seats if they only ran some people in my area.
The poor are totally hoodwinked half the time down here and when they get mobilized the democratic party is nowhere to be found. Obama could have won SC if he tried. This a poor poor poor state- this isnt a republican stronghold because people love republicans - its because dems dont even bother to try outside of the major cities - columbia-charleston etc
It isnt very hard to get out a message that republicans dont give a shit about the poor. Dems down here never bother doing it. Republicans were scared as hell last November and Dems didnt do anything to capitalize on their weakness
January 22, 2009 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
South Carolina, my ass - you're talking about the Kentucky Second. First, Fourth and Fifth, too, for that matter.
Even Howard couldn't light a fire under the worthless DINOs that infest this place; Kaine doesn't have a chance.
January 22, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Dems could have gotten solicitor, coroner, state house and senate seats if they only ran some people in my area."
We NEED people to step forward to run!! Do you know how hard is has been to coax people to step up? Then we need MORE MONEY for our candidates.
As Thom Hartmann said "get involved!" (which is what i did when moved to this state a few years ago.) Help out the party any way you can: LTE's, fund-raising, volunteer for candidates, etc...
January 22, 2009 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I remember opposing busing myself, but for environmental and economic reasons, not because of any racist sentiments. In Louisville, KY, it came during the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo - really bad timing.
I was ten.
January 22, 2009 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do remember the anti-busing demonstrations near every school campus in the city, though. Very nasty demonstrations where they sometimes burned tires for added effect.
I don't think that's something to which I would want to hitch my wagon, but then again, I'm not running for GOP chairman.
January 22, 2009 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Every day, something more to celebrate, eh?
January 22, 2009 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Small world. I grew up in Louisville, Kentucky and had first-hand experience with the busing program there...as a rider. As a 12-year-old I recall being a strident opponent of busing. However, the only reason was I had to ride said bus to school 90 minutes each way. Thankfully, the busing/desegregation schemes went through some major overhauls during my primary/secondary school years (1976-1988) and there was only one year when I was subject to the interminable bus rides.
If I recall correctly, in high school a ‘home school’ scheme was in effect. Each school had a ‘home’ feeder area; basically a racially gerrymandered district that would provide each school a racially balanced student body. That’s how they achieved integration without busing people across town. Unfortunately, the districts weren’t demographically balanced in any other way. Ergo, I ended up at a school that was fully integrated with poor people. That wasn’t exactly a recipe for success either.
January 22, 2009 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Memo to Republicans:
You're in a deep hole. Keep digging.
January 22, 2009 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's what's sad: Many prominent Democrats opposed busing. Dick Gephardt and Geraldine Ferrarro both voted for the constitutional amendment prohibiting busing. Although Joe Biden opposed the constitutional amendment prohibiting busing, he voted against using federal funds for busing.
January 22, 2009 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
i think its that same politico report in which they talk about how race is a major factor in the RNC's decision on who to make chariman.
its like they think if they elect a black guy as chairman, all their problems will go away. What they don't seem to understand is it doesn't matter if the chairman is black, white, orange or pink. If the policies and positions they espouse aren't helpful to minorities they won't ever get enough support from minorities to remain politically viable.
So while diversity is a good thing, just putting a black guy in charge of the republican party won't solve their problems if its the same old republican party with the same old republican ideas...
January 22, 2009 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Busing was rather stupid. To improve schooling for black youths you go out and buy buses and hire drivers? Why not use the money to build and repair schools in black areas, hire more teachers, and fund more books--up-to-date ones--and equipment? Seems like a no-brainer.
January 22, 2009 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dunno. Brown v Board of Ed., maybe?
January 22, 2009 3:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Busing was rather stupid."
Posted by edwcorey
*****After the country has just elected the 1st AA Prez of the USA,you make a statement like that?
January 22, 2009 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not sure if you're old enough to remember it, but busing was stupid in that it a) was a ham-handed approach to achieving parity in education funding and quality, b) imposed hardships on lots of kids both black and white (see Joe Bob above on long bus rides) and c) alienated large swaths of democratic voters. The resentment toward busing was key to making Reagan a viable candidate in the northeast in 1980, not to mention causing/accelerating white flight from urban areas and increasing suburban sprawl. Busing advocates had their hearts in the right place, but there are a lot of reasons why it faded from the scene.
January 22, 2009 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink