TPMDC
« Source: Obama Plans to Get Family Planning Aid Done Soon | Home | Blagojevich Removed From Office »

Should Environmental Laws be Waived to Expedite Stimulus Spending?

Much of the debate over the potential effectiveness of Congress' economic stimulus bill centers on how quickly the $800-billion-plus can be spent.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office -- formerly run by Obama's new budget director, Peter Orszag -- has estimated that 64% of the House stimulus money can be disbursed within the first 18 months. Meanwhile, Orszag himself has promised to let loose 75% of it into the economy.

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-ND), who's been concerned with thae spend-out rate in general, recently asked the CBO to evaluate ways that the stimulus money could be spent quicker. The CBO's first answer? "Waiving requirements for environmental and judicial reviews" of the impact of stimulus spending projects, according to a letter released today (and downloadable here).

This is a prospect that has troubled environmental groups. In a letter to congressional leaders earlier this month, a broad green coalition argued that waiving requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in order to speed through stimulus projects would be counter-productive. From the letter:

Inevitably, in the course of congressional consideration, special interests will assert that we cannot afford the NEPA process in a time of national urgency. The truth is that we cannot afford that kind of leap-before-you-look rashness. We have neither the time nor the resources to waste on measures that ultimately prove to be unproductive or harmful.

The issue of waiving environmental reviews is particularly contentious in California, where Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) is locked in a battle with green groups over 10 major highway projects.

When White House spokesman Robert Gibbs was asked about environmental waivers at today's press briefing, he said:

Let me give for you in this answer what the president told the governors when he met with them -- I guess this would have been sometime in mid- to late November in Philadelphia, because this was an issue that was raised, I think maybe by Governor Schwarzenegger or by one of the other governors, regulatory red tape, so to speak.

And the president simply said, you know, if there are things that we can do to speed money into the economy as it relates to infrastructure spending or things like that, he's more than happy to take a look at them, in -- in order to get this money infused into the economy and putting people back to work as quickly as possible.


13 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Answer: No.

user-pic

Maybe the requirements can be expedited, but there must be some environmental review. I know the red tape can hold up projects for ages, but that can be remedied somewhat by choosing projects carefully. Many building projects often already have been vetted, but await money.

BTW, what's California doing building more roads? The place is awash with 20+ lane highways that are clogged twice-daily. Methinks Arnold needs to think about trains instead of automobiles....

user-pic

Hmmm. Reduce delay by staffing up the agencies that do reviews?

user-pic

What a crazy idea.

user-pic

Seconded. Relative to the paltry amount of infrastructure money in the bill there are almost certainly more than enough environmentally-reviewed projects ready to go. In mass transit much of the allotted sum could easily be spent just buying subway cars and buses.

user-pic

I agree-no. There are enough ways to stimulate the economy without raping the environment. It seems self-defeating anyway if something is done that will later have to be undone or revised or what have you. Though I suppose you could argue that having to redo a road or 50 would be even more stimulative.

user-pic

Seems like it might be problematic.

Precedent setting, and all. Sure, we have a Democratic president and a Democratic controlled Congress right now, but is it necessary to set a precedent that can then be misused by future politicians?

user-pic

I'm thinking about the portion of "green economy" jobs in this package, and amused by the idea of us starting projects designed to improve the environment and then skipping the environmental impact study step.

Maybe then we will need new projects to fix the environmental disasters caused by the first set of projects, creating even more stimulus.

user-pic

Environment regulations and oversight will prevent disasters, save lives, and prevent boondoggles. The projects that are initiated must be of a clean and durable nature.

Deregulation is the signature problem of our era. Lack of oversight, accountability and rules have made a hash of this nation. Let's not fall for it because we're desperate.

user-pic

Pushing these projects through without environmental review and oversight would be like handing $700 billion to the banking industry without any oversight or accountablity or transparency.

We can open the federal (borrowed) coffers like a firehouse, or we spend the money in a responsible way.

user-pic

Oh god, no. I thought maybe we were going to get a break from this type of sh** for a while. Say it ain't so, BO.

user-pic

Don't fret. Barack will always respond in a considered, reasoned tone even to hair-brained ideas like this. He'll think it through and then make a good decision.

Stupid ideas will keep getting aired. The difference is we are hearing about them ahead of time instead of after they have already been implemented.

Keep the faith!

user-pic

In Florida there is already a disregard for all Law including the Environmental Laws that are disregarded for influential developers.

What is needed is enforcement of Law and open government for the Citizen’s Interest.

Without oversight and regard for Law the Stimulus will be siphoned off by the same corrupt individuals that drove the illegal activities that brought us to our present collapse.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address