TPMDC
« The Larry Summers Fan Club is Losing Members Fast | Home | RNC Election, Round Three: Steele Takes The Lead -- Can He Keep It? »

Silly Democrats! Who Cares About Keeping Health Care Costs Down?

This just makes me cringe. In an interview this afternoon with Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), a CNN reporter practically snickered at the idea of spending $75 million on smoking cessation programs as part of an economic stimulus bill. The anchor introduced the segment this way:

HARRIS: You know, just about every line of the huge stimulus bill contains millions for what most Democrats are calling job creation and many Republicans are calling waste, arguments based on differing political philosophies perhaps. But who could argue that spending millions to help people quit smoking will create jobs?

No one is arguing that. But as Harkin tried to explain, small investments in preventative care measures, such as smoking cessation, have a hugely beneficial effect on overall health care costs. And he was mocked for attempting it:

GRIFFIN: Senator, it just seems like this is not the bill. We're trying to get the economy moving, we're trying to get people back to work, and I'm having a hard time understanding how $75 million to tell people to stop smoking is going to put anybody back to work.

HARKIN: Well, first of all, I would tell you, we put -- we put over $5 billion in this bill on prevention so that we can get ahead of the curve and start cutting health care costs.

GRIFFIN: Senator, I've got to be skeptical, because what I think I'm hearing from you is, yes, we want to get people off of smoking, but here you go, Joe, you're out of work, but, by golly, at least you're not smoking.

Did this approach come straight from Rep. John Boehner's (R-OH) cigarette-adorned mouth?


8 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

It's not a economic stimulus though. Put that in the health care reform bill. I understand everything is basically intertwined but when you think of smoking cessation you don't think of jobs creation.

user-pic

wow. Color me stunned. A CNN anchor takes one part of proposed legislation, simplifies it to absurdity, and a Democrat is unable to crisply and clearly explain why the anchor is wrong.

I guess this is the first time this has ever happened to a Democrat.

user-pic

This is not purely a jobs bill. It's an economic stimulus bill. If people spend less on health care they have more money available to spend on other needs. But even from a jobs perspective, health care is expensive (relatively low jobs/$ ratio). Almost anything else people spend their money on will result in a net increase in jobs.

user-pic

Or, how about this: cigaretts are extremely expensive (and getting more so, what with SCHIP). Money not spent on cigarettes can be spent on other stuff.

user-pic

Or how about this? Bonehead CNN anchors are expensive. Getting them off the air leaves money for other uses and reduces the amount of money people spend on aspirin. Hey, I think I've got a new addition to the bill!!

user-pic

I'd vote for it!

user-pic

Works for me!

user-pic

So there should be money set aside for a major law enforcement hire because if the government really cracked down on the drug trade that money could be spent elsewhere legally and could be taxed.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Elana
Schor

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Capital Wire

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address