TPMDC
« Vitter Facing Possible Circus Primary: Christian-Right Activist And Porn Star | Home | Reid: Health Care Coming in the Summer »

Democratic Spending Bill Reverses Infamous Bush Rule on Endangered Species

The $410 billion government spending bill that's poised to pass the House of Representatives today contains a lot of good new science and sex-ed policies -- but that's not its only hidden gem.

The bill also authorizes a reversal of last year's controversial Bush end run around the Endangered Species Act, which would allow oil rigs and highways to be built anywhere in the U.S. without independent reviews of their potential impact on the surrounding wildlife populations. As Bloomberg reports:

The provision authorizes President Barack Obama to reverse a Bush administration rule that said energy projects outside the habitat of polar bears couldn't be blocked solely because emissions might add to global warming and destruction of the arctic species.

...

The provision could also expand the consultations required before changes are made to endangered-species listings. A rule issued under President George W. Bush limited the number of agencies that had to weigh in on decisions about endangered animals.

This authorization should be a welcome development for the environmental community -- provided that the Senate version of the spending bill keeps it intact. (It almost makes up for the Democrats' decision to kick the can down the road on the Medicaid family-planning aid that was cut from the stimulus last month ... the spending bill wasn't the most likely vehicle for restoring that aid, but it could've happened.)


5 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Hold on now... You say "...last year's controversial Bush end run around the Endangered Species Act, which would allow oil rigs and highways to be built anywhere in the U.S. without independent reviews of their potential impact on the surrounding wildlife populations..."
then the article says "...reverse a Bush administration rule that said energy projects outside the habitat of polar bears couldn't be blocked solely because emissions might add to global warming and destruction of the arctic species."
You seem to have a pretty broad interpritation of a narrowly worded rule. I'm sure you hate Bush because he created evil (with the assistance of Cheney) but to not allow a project being built in Florida to be blocked because the emissions may contribute to global warming and thereby threaten endangered polar bears is not the same as allowing "...oil rigs and highways to be built anywhere in the U.S. without independent reviews of their potential impact on the surrounding wildlife populations..."

user-pic

I agree that the blurb they printed from Bloomberg doesn't support the lead-in. That's bad writing. However, the lead-in is correct. If you follow the link to the LA Times story, the first paragraph reads:

"The Bush administration on Thursday eliminated 35-year-old regulations in the Endangered Species Act that required an independent scientific review of proposed federal projects to determine whether they imperil protected plants and animals."

So in other words, it wasn't TPM misinterpreting the upshot of the decision. It was just them choosing a bad blurb.

user-pic

Smacked down, again.

SFCWallace never learns.

user-pic

Endangered Species Act is this a way to save the GOP?

user-pic

That would be the Endangered Specious Act. =)

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address