TPMDC
« Virginia GOP Chairman's Twitter Outreach: Massive Fail | Home | Solis Clears One Hurdle, But Another Remains »

Dems Push Past Awkward First Step on Stimulus

Congressional Democrats have just begun a public meeting to bless the already-agreed-upon details of their $789 billion stimulus bill, pushing past an awkward first step that saw House negotiators fail to show up for an earlier sitdown on the economic recovery plan.

The House discontent, as many outlets are reporting, stems from the House's $16 billion in school-building aid. As I reported this afternoon, a senior Democratic chairman was appearing with the New York City mayor to declare himself "cautiously optimistic" about the school-building money -- while senators were zeroing out that cash behind closed doors.

Democrats are bouncing back with promises to that the stimulus money given to stabilize state budgets ($39 billion in the Senate compromise, $79 billion in the House bill, now boosted to $54 billion) could also be used for school repairs. But that's unlikely to be enough for House members, and we could see targeted school-building aid put back in before the first votes on the stimulus package occur tomorrow.

Why was this less than a complete victory for Democrats?

Because GOPers are even now passing around stories like this one, relishing the opportunity to play up the bad optics of this afternoon's conference meeting no-show.

With C-SPAN televising the conference meeting right now, Republicans will also have a chance to play up the fact that they were totally excluded from the process, aside from the three GOP senators whose votes were needed to break a threatened filibuster.

Shutting out the minority party was certainly the Republicans' preferred mode when they were in charge, but the mainstream media is awfully susceptible to GOP complaints on this front. And as Josh observes, Obama's early emphasis on bipartisanship is exacerbating that tendency in the press.


14 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Yeah, funny how having a meeting where your leadership tells everyone to vote against the bill before you even begin negotiating (making it obvious you're negotiating in bad faith) tends to have the effect of getting you shut out of the negotiations.

user-pic

so do congresspeople that vote against bills normally get invited to hash out the details for the bill that they intend to vote against again?

I always assumed that if you vote no, you don't get to (or have to) go hash things out in conference.

user-pic

I think the republican response, if the shoe was on the other foot, would be "whiners."

But democrats are too refined for that type of public discourse. Maybe Begala and his side kick, Carville, could hit the pundit circuit and put it (republicans as whiners) out there?

user-pic

Add ad obstructionist to booth.

user-pic

Not to be a selfish asshole, but can someone please tell me what the hell is going on with the home buyer credit? :)

user-pic

I read that was dropped.

user-pic

I'm not going to try to defend this on policy grounds, but nooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!

user-pic

I agree, and the policy grounds I object on is that that sounded like the best way to stimulate the housing market and compensate for the devaluation of home prices everywhere.

Folks (like me and perhaps you) who have kept up their mortgages but now want to move property have no incentive to do so.

Letting the banks shuffle around interest rates and try to recover the losses from bad mortgages does NOTHING for the real estate market that a big part of the current crisis.

All the other spending and tax breaks are great, but I haven't seen or heard of anything else that would directly stimulate house sales/new starts as well as that $15K credit.

Booooo

user-pic

A terrible idea. We don't need to stimulate more home-buying, thus further inflating the already inflated value of people's homes. What we need to do is prevent massive foreclosures (e.g., forcing banks to restructure mortgages) and get the economy moving again.

Also, see Dean Baker for a thorough debunking of this idea. I'm glad it's out of the bill.

user-pic
Because GOPers are even now passing around stories like this one, relishing the opportunity to play up the bad optics of this afternoon's conference meeting no-show.

And I should care about this... why?

user-pic

Because Democrats don't like it when Republicans talk shit about Democrats. Only Democrats are allowed to talk shit about Democrats.

user-pic

And I thought only Republicans wanted their soldiers to march in lock-step behind Party and Leader.

user-pic

The side-by-side photos of Nancy Pelousy and Harriet Reid is truly horrifying. Will nobody in Congress empty the trash?

user-pic

The original bill with more added and nothing cut needs complete secrecy until it is passed.
Lying, stinking politicians is not yet the correct lable for them.
Lying is fine until the truth about the bill is passed and published and only then the stinking can be added.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address