Gregg Confirmation Flashpoint Emerges as GOPers Decry White House Census Move
The Senate Commerce Committee has yet to schedule Judd Gregg's confirmation hearing to lead the Commerce Department. Still, don't be surprised if the bone-dry subject of the Census -- as our own Matt predicted -- makes Gregg the latest Obama nominee to be caught up in a GOP-generated flap.
But it won't be Gregg directly caught in the cross-hairs of his former Senate Republican colleagues. Instead it looks like GOPers are ready to go after Rahm Emanuel, accusing the White House chief of staff of yanking the Census away from Gregg's department and claiming it for himself.
I know, the notion sounds absurd -- but let me walk you through it.
CQ, which first reported on Gregg's opposition to emergency funding for the 2000 Census, got the Obama administration to reveal that the director of the 2010 Census would report directly to the White House rather than the Commerce Secretary. Moving the sensitive business of population-counting away from Commerce would help assuage the concerns of black and Latino groups that were less-than-pleased with Gregg's nomination ... but Republicans haven't forgotten that the Census results determine how congressional districts are re-drawn within each state.
And who's in charge at the White House these days? Emanuel, the two-term chairman of the House Democratic campaign committee, who pressed for Dem-friendly congressional redistricting in his home state three years ago. First Reps. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) and Darrell Issa (R-CA) cried foul in a letter to Obama:
The constitutionally-mandated decennial Census needs to be fair, accurate and trusted. By circumventing the secretary of commerce's oversight of the Census Bureau and handing it directly to a political operative such as Mr. Emanuel, you are severely jeopardizing the fairness and accuracy of the 2010 Census.
Now House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) has chimed in with a warning that Census oversight will be an issue during Gregg's confirmation. Without mentioning Emanuel, Boehner said ominously that the Census "should not be directed by political operatives working out of the White House."
House Republicans won't be in the room for Gregg's confirmation hearing, however, and their Senate counterparts have yet to raise similar questions about White House supervision of the Census.
John Cornyn (TX), the Senate GOP's current campaign chief, told me that "I don't think it's right to play politics with the Census" but added that he hadn't heard in full about his House colleagues' apprehension. The ultimate decision on the issue may rest with another Texan, Kay Bailey Hutchison, the senior Republican on the Commerce panel.
Late Update: Congressional Black Caucus Chairwoman Barbara Lee (D-CA), one of the first to question Gregg's past stances on the Census, just released a statement defending the White House move as in keeping with precedent.
There is precedent for the director of the census and the White House to work closely. It therefore makes perfect sense that the president would seek to exercise as much oversight of this core function of our democracy as possible.
Late Late Update: A Senate source makes the relevant observation that the Census isn't actually under Commerce's jurisdiction -- it belongs to the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which won't get to hold a confirmation hearing on Gregg.
Still, there's only one Republican who would know that: Sen. John Ensign (NV), who's a member of both committees. And he also happens to be Cornyn's predecessor in the GOP campaign chief's post ...


















I was wondering why it was taking so long for them to start screaming about this. And they actually have a point. Imagine if the census was under control of the Bush White House.
February 6, 2009 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
So what would be a better solution?
I don't think it's appropriate to leave it in the stewardship of Gregg.
February 6, 2009 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why not? Is Gregg more likely to muck with it than any other Commerce Secretary we've had (or could choose)? It's not as if Commerce Secretary isn't a political job.
February 6, 2009 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
His past suggests that he doesn't view the Census as a priority. Having him in charge of it seems sorta like having Chao in charge of Labor.
On the other hand, Chao's boss couldn't have given a crap about Labor, while Obama's administration has publicly said how important the census is.
In any event, the Republicans are squawking about an inaccurate report. The White House is quoted as saying that the Census Director would work with (not report to) a high ranking Administration official.
A small difference.
February 6, 2009 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't see any reason to expect that the Commerce Secretary would have any more direct influence over the census than the Treasury Secretary would tell the IRS who to audit. It's not as if it's Tom DeLay in this job. If you've got a hard reason to think Gregg is going to do anything improper, let's hear it. Otherwise, what's the big deal?
February 6, 2009 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
His past includes voting no on funding for the Census. Why have an individual who doesn't seem to believe in the importance of the Census in charge of it?
February 7, 2009 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
As horrifying as that would have been, keep in mind that we all had the good fortune to have Bush's terms occur between the censuses
Besides, given that conventional wisdom is that blue states (Ma, NY...) will be losing districts and red states (AZ, TX, and some others) will be gaining, do we really want a Republican running that show?
February 6, 2009 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hans von Spakovsky as Census director. And it's not even Halloween.
February 6, 2009 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can you imagine Cheney, with his anti-Constitutional, gangsterite, greazy mits on the *census?* One minute shooting his friend in the face and incurring criminal liability by not reporting it, and the next raging to us why he needs to gerrymander voting districts to protect us from the terrorists his crazed administration never ran down?
February 6, 2009 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has Gregg actually resigned his Senate seat yet? The best solution would be if his liberal repug replacement were already seated when Senate dems suddenly rejected him.
Then we get Gregg out of the Senate, a caretaker liberal in a trending-dem seat, and for Commerce Secretary somebody who's willing to play hardball on the Census.
One of these times, the repug knee-jerk rejection of nominees is going to backfire on them.
February 6, 2009 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
No.
February 12, 2009 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
So do the Thugs wanna put a hold on Gregg? FINE by me. Knock yourselves out, doofs.
February 6, 2009 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whoa… One more time:
Senator Cornyn of TX—home of the rabidly political former House Majority Leader DeLay, currently under indictment, who perfected the process of twisting census data to slant redistricting decisions in favor of the Repubican party—has the audacity to state that he does not "… think it's right to play politics with the Census?"
WTF? This is truly the theater of the absurd.
February 6, 2009 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Happy to see that someone else is paying attention! Cornyn is really trying to make a name for himself as Hutchinson is looking to leave the Senate if she is elected GOV of TX.
As a texas voter (not to be confused with a Texan), I have watched his recent behavior (holding Cabinet members...and then the first words out of his mouth: I will vote for them) as just Grand Standing to get his name in print and mug on TV. Unfortunately, he isn't up for re-election until 2012.
There have been a number of GOP individuals who are calling for "non-political" venues...so they can politicize them...and the beat goes on!
February 7, 2009 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you! The irony of a Texas R official complaining about census isn't lost on me, either.
February 12, 2009 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gregg can step down if he wants to. Otherwise STFU. If Obama nominated a Democrat for the Commerce post there wouldn't have been a damn thing the GOP could have did about the census then either.
I'm all for a completely non-political census. However we've seen how well the GOP works with others, so offering a bipartisan oversite would greatly muck up the works in going about getting people counted.
February 6, 2009 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Rahm really engineered this I'm going to have to rethink my less than fond opinion of him. It's absolutely a genius stroke. Apparently Gregg has agreed to this as a condition of his nomination. Sort of mitigates the political price he's exacted by requiring a Rep be his replacement and his recusal on supporting the stim pkg. And what can the Republiscum do but throw a tantrum? Do they block their own from the job? Now that really would cement their image as the absurdiacs that they are.
February 6, 2009 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
This goes to my prediction last week: Obama's intention is to use Gregg to dismantle Commerce into its constituent parts and reassign them to other departments. Cutting big government without cutting any essential services. It's a master stroke. Just wait.
February 6, 2009 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dump Gregg. Give the census back to Commerce. Appoint Dennis Kucinich Secretary of Commerce.
February 6, 2009 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Late Late Update: A Senate source makes the relevant observation that the Census isn't actually under Commerce's jurisdiction -- it belongs to the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which won't get to hold a confirmation hearing on Gregg. "
That seems to mix the Senate with the Cabinet. I think you're saying that Senate-related matters dealing with the Census are handled via Lieberman, that L. will tend to dominate any Congressional issues with the Census. But the Census clearly is currently handled by the Commerce Dept.
February 6, 2009 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look, I don't think it's a good idea to remove census from Commerce. It should stay there and instead, Obama should nominate someone who can actually do the job rather than dumbing down the job for a Republican.
It's not OBAMA's fault Republicans are too backward and stupid and hateful to run the government properly.
February 7, 2009 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seems like the Greg nomination backfired big time on the WH.The best thing would be to pull the nomination from Greg.All the bending over backwards to please Repukes & the WH can't even get his vote on the stimulus.Seems like a major league eff-up to me.
February 7, 2009 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
How so?
If it backfired on anyone, it is Gregg and the GOP.
February 12, 2009 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink