TPMDC
« How It's Playing Back Home | Home | Goodbye, Tom Daschle »

McCain Sends Out E-Mail Petition Against Stimulus Bill

John McCain is now adding his voice to the Republican activism against the stimulus bill, sending out an e-mail to his supporter list that asks recipients to sign a petition opposing it.

McCain's e-mail complains that there is too much government spending in the bill that won't create jobs, and that instead there should be payroll tax cuts and a clear "end game" to the stimulus to guarantee that the spending stops after the recessions is over. McCain also complains that the White House has behaved in a partisan manner, as evidenced by the House Republicans' unanimous vote against the bill:

But as of yet, Republicans have not been given the opportunity to be involved. The House of Representatives passed a stimulus bill without a single Republican supporting it. In the Senate, the Democrat leadership is trying to jam the existing proposal through regardless of reservations from a number of members. With so much at stake, the last thing we need is partisanship driving our attempts to turn the economy around.

The Republican position here is now clear: They say that government spending during an economic crisis does not prop up the economy. The question is whether they will maintain just enough strength in the Senate to put this theory into practice, by making sure that whatever bill does eventually pass would be more to their liking.

The full McCain e-mail is available after the jump.

Dear McCain Supporter,

Yesterday, the Senate began debate on an economic stimulus package that is intended to get our economy back on track and help Americans who are suffering through these difficult times. Unfortunately, the proposal on the table is big on the giveaways for the special interests and corporate high rollers, yet short on help for ordinary working Americans. I cannot and do not support the package on the table from the Democrats and the Obama Administration. Our country does not need just another spending bill, particularly not one that will load future generations with the burden of massive debt. We need a short term stimulus bill that will directly help people, create jobs, and provide a jolt to our economy.

I believe we need to evaluate every bit of spending in this stimulus proposal with one important criteria - does it really stimulate the economy and help create jobs - if the answer is no, it does not belong in a so-called stimulus package. Furthermore, the stimulus must include significant direct relief to American workers in the form of payroll tax cuts and programs to help homeowners keep their homes. Finally, we need an end game to this stimulus so that when our economy recovers, these spending programs do not remain permanent and saddle our children with a skyrocketing national debt.

I appreciate the discussions President Obama is having with my Republican colleagues, but the time for talking has come to an end and we must now begin some serious negotiation. But as of yet, Republicans have not been given the opportunity to be involved. The House of Representatives passed a stimulus bill without a single Republican supporting it. In the Senate, the Democrat leadership is trying to jam the existing proposal through regardless of reservations from a number of members. With so much at stake, the last thing we need is partisanship driving our attempts to turn the economy around.

I have long been a fighter against wasteful spending in Washington and long an advocate for a balanced budget -- that will never change. I realize we face extraordinary challenges with our economy today, but that is not an excuse for more irresponsibly from Washington. I hope you will join me in saying no to this stimulus package as it currently exists by signing this petition.


Sincerely,

John McCain
Chair, Country First PAC

38 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

McCain is so damn transparent. Republicans start calling him an Obama lap dog, and a primary challenge presents itself for 2010 and all of a sudden he's Obama's biggest critic. And once he gets the Republican nod to run for re-election in 2010 he'll become Obama's biggest fan in order to stave off a democratic challenger.

user-pic

Actually, no matter how thick the McCain rabble about the economy, even a moderate Republican like me got it. I could no longer be a Republican since the party has so stubbornly resisted anything that needs to be passed for the recovery from the financial mess caused by the Republican Party. Amazing after the 8 years of the Bushonomics, that Republicans simply do not get it that serious measures are needed to stop the hemorrhage in the financial situation of our country. I sent a letter back to McCain requesting to be removed from his contact list since I am now a newly registered Democrat. I am certain that after the miserable financial mess Republicans have made in our country, droves will do just exactly what I did and Republicans can expect a long era out of power similar to the New Deal era that rescued us from the stupidity of the Republican induced depression.

user-pic

Actually, no matter how thick the McCain rabble about the economy, even a moderate Republican like me got it. I could no longer be a Republican since the party has so stubbornly resisted anything that needs to be passed for the recovery from the financial mess caused by the Republican Party. Amazing after the 8 years of the Bushonomics, that Republicans simply do not get it that serious measures are needed to stop the hemorrhage in the financial situation of our country. I sent a letter back to McCain requesting to be removed from his contact list since I am now a newly registered Democrat. I am certain that after the miserable financial mess Republicans have made in our country, droves will do just exactly what I did and Republicans can expect a long era out of power similar to the New Deal era that rescued us from the stupidity of the Republican induced depression.

user-pic

HOLY crap. Daschle just dropped out!

user-pic

Snap!...I wonder what else was "coming out"...?

user-pic

Paging governor dean. Paging governor dean. He would be perfect. I was never really hot about daschle anyway and this bs just torpedoed his ship. Now he can lobby dean on behalf of the healthcare industry.

user-pic

Absolutely the right decision. Probably would have come sooner but I think Obama wanted to let Daschle make the decision on his own, given that he's been a sort of mentor to Obama and supported him early, when everybody thought Hillary was a shoe-in. Had Daschle held out, I think Obama would have finally pulled the string. While he probably would have been confirmed, senatorial courtesy doesn't extend outside of the chamber. Folks on both sides were calling for him to step-down...the liberals were realistic about this - they didn't fall in line behind Dear Leader like the GOP did for years under Bush.

It's kind of a shame that Killefer had to fall on her sword for what really looks like a very minor and understandable oversight. But with Geithner and Daschle, Obama really didn't have a choice. American people might forgive one tax cheat, but not three. And Dascle also had the added stink of lobbying. If Obama is going to talk-the-talk about ethics and responsibility and no lobbyists, he has to walk-the-walk.

Wonder if Daschle will continue in his healthcare "czar" role? And I wouldn't hold out hope for Dean getting the HHS slot. Not going to happen. Who will get it, I wonder?

Now, can we move on to the business at hand - ie, fixing this economy and our nation in general?

user-pic

Atrios is right. McCain lost Indiana - who cares what he thinks?

Sadly, the answer is "a bunch of people with microphones."

user-pic

If the bill gets passed, each Senator that voted NO, will NOT get money for his State. that's what should happen

user-pic

Right, we should punish millions of Americans by leaving them jobless and poor because they were so foolish as to elect Senators who disagreed with the majority that decided to pull them out. Sure, makes sense to me.

Social darwinism is just as ugly via electoral politics as it is via veiled class/race warfare. That's their game; let's not make it ours.

user-pic

"I have long been a fighter against wasteful spending in Washington and long an advocate for a balanced budget -- that will never change."

Give it a rest, John. Campaign's over...you lost. Nobody bought that crap the first time around.

What a tool. The wingnut crazies will NEVER like him...why does he keep trying?

user-pic

I encourage all of you to go sign it.
I signed my name, Herbert Hoover / HHoover@whitehouse.gov

user-pic

I'm gonna go sign as Mickey Mouse. For whatever reason, Republicans think that is funny.

user-pic

Have the Republicans defined what they mean by "stimulus"? So far as I can tell, the only thing they think is a stimulant is a tax cut. Haven't they heard of all the studies that rank tax cuts behind things like food stamps in their stimulative effect? Or spending on the arts? Extending unemployment benefits? Those things put money in the hands of people who will turn around and spend it right away. The Republicans can't seem to grasp that that kind of spending is stimulus. Or, more probably, they know they're blowing smoke but they are ad idem with Rush Limbaugh in wanting Pres. Obama to fail. To hell with what happens to the country and the world!

user-pic

Whether or not they grasp it- they just don't care. They're very effective and completely shameless demagogues (and value nothing except their own political success), and the press is lapping this shit up (as usual) and getting the public highly confused. I'm getting quite worried. I hope Obama's new media offensive is a big success, but I wish he was getting a lot more messaging help from our Congressional "leaders".

user-pic

Republicans always get "stimulated" by tax cuts.

user-pic

John McCain has more personalities then Sybil. Looks like Bad John has reemerged.

user-pic

This is not a good thing. Keep in mind he is not exactly the same thing as "Senate Republicans," as 45.6% of American voters chose him to be president over Obama.

user-pic

Most of the "45.6% of American voters" would have voted for a per rock if it had an "R" after the name.

user-pic

Classic liberal blog echo chamber comment, an attempt to create one's own reality. It will take you nowhere, and I am thankful the current president does not think that way.

user-pic

What do you see Obama gaining by his attempts at bipartisanship, other than a face full of spit?

user-pic

What's Republican party ID running these days? Around 30%? Or put another way, 2/3 of McCain's take in the election? Now, given the current climate, where everyone who isn't an absolute wingnut has been purged from the party...can we safely assume that those 30% of Americans would have voted for *any* Republican candidate? Or at least that 75% of them (half the total McCain vote) would have? If it's even close, saying that "most" of that 45% of Americans would have voted for a Republican "rock" is a completely valid comment. Of course the reader has to have intelligence beyond that of a rock to recognize that the statement isn't literal...

Which brings me to a couple of questions:
1)Is figurative language dead?
2)Do you appraise anything other than realist portraits?

user-pic

McCain has no credibility. The Republicans to watch are in the Midwest (e.g., Grassley) and the Northeast (e.g, Snowe).

It's clear that, except for some of these folks, the Republicans in the Senate have been persuaded by their colleagues in the House to take the same position. If they do so, they will lend credibility to the House Republicans for their no vote, and stave off any more House beading in the 2010 elections.

user-pic

Look, I'm surrounded by typical conservative Midwesterners and you're just flat wrong about McCain's credibility. The same 46% who voted for him (a higher % of that where I live and work though) would do it again today.

We can ill afford this kind of "Republicans have no credibility" complacency when in fact they're eating our lunch on messaging about the stimulus.

user-pic

What!?!? McPOW!?!? WHO CARES???? He was overwhelmingly repudiated in November. Does anyone remember the election?? We voted AGAINST this guy's ideas! My God, where is the WH leadership???

user-pic

this is all Obamas fault.

after you win your suppoesed to LEAD, not go around asking the losers what you can do for them.


expect more of this as i pointed out long ago, Obama likes to please his enemies and throw his supporters under the bus.

user-pic

I'm confused. I thought the GOP was crying foul because the stimulus bill was already providing "government welfare" to people that only pay payroll taxes and not federal income tax, and now they're crying because there aren't enough payroll tax cuts? I'm seriously confused, and perhaps the GOP is too.

user-pic

They're not confused- they just have zero interest in policy or in the welfare of the country (or in consistency). It's all politics, all the time. (Hence the illusory nature of "bipartisanship".)

user-pic

The Democrats need to get out front, en masse, on the stimulus and attack the Republicans for fighting a bill that helps the economy and creates jobs.

Put the Repugs on the defensive for a change.

user-pic

The only serious anti-stimulus argument I've seen out there is the one about the market in treasuries. There is no trust in the ability of the US government to fix its structural deficit, so the cost of borrowing is about to explode (take a look at Willem Buiter at the FT). Bush added 4 trillion to the govt debt, and Obama is about to add another 4 trillion with the stimulus and bank bailout. That puts the US in the same fiscal fitness class as Portugal and Italy.

Its an argument I'd like to see Krugman et al take on...

user-pic

Wrong!

"The Republican position here is now clear: They say that government spending during an economic crisis does not prop up the economy."

One Repo position is rather that we should not prop up the economy, on principle.

There is an additional position, that the cost/benefit of propping up the economy in the long run is greater than 1 due to borrowing costs and moral hazard costs.

McCain: "But as of yet, Republicans have not been given the opportunity to be involved."

That strikes me as an outright lie. Republicans chose not to get seriously involved early on. Voting en masse against the bill in the House does not show they had no opportunity to get involved.

Looks like more "politics by partisan trash talk" to me.

user-pic

HEY HARRY REID!!!! DO YOUR FUCKING JOB!
MAKE THE REPUBLICANS ACTUALLY FILIBUSTER!!!!

user-pic

Howard Dean would be good. Or former Oregon governor John Kitzhaber - he is an ER physican, was a great governor, and he has a health care initiative going in Oregon called The Archimedies Project.

He would be a perfect choice. And he seems to be pretty clean as politians go.

user-pic

I love McCains letter urging bipartisanship at the same time he refers to the "Democrat party".

Sore Loserman indeed.

user-pic

What I want to know is, where the hell is our 'Vote Yes' on to support President Obama petition?

And Howard Dean would need to print his own god damn apology stationery if he took over as HHS. I understand all the groovy "he saved us with the 50-state strategy" love, but seriously? He'd just go around DC pissing people off and getting nothing done.

user-pic

Hrmm...the link on McCain's email for the petition no longer works. I wonder if they realized a flat out opposition was just a bad idea.

user-pic

Nobody should be supporting this bill as a stimulus. It isn't stimulating anything other than government growth. And the Senate's version is even more egregious than the House's unbelieveably enough.

http://organizedexploitation.blogspot.com/2009/02/slicing-up-senates-spending.html

user-pic

I find it almost funny...almost! as here is a politician who is saying NO...without a completed bill in hand. Opps, yes he is leaving the country and won't be around for the vote, that is surely a well thought out plan.

Is he following the Limbaugh rule - and want for Obama to fail...this is how a "great" politician behaves??? I think not.

The GOP talking heads are complaining about the "made in American steel", but a quick check of both bills....worded slightly different, but essentially the same. One can only hope that the public will do their homework and know that we are being sold a lot of cr*p by these individuals.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Elana
Schor

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address