TPMDC Morning Roundup
Obama's Day Ahead: The First Speech To Congress
President Obama is meeting at 10:30 a.m. ET with Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso, the first foreign leader to come to the United States to meet with Obama. At 4:30 p.m., Obama and Vice President Biden are meeting with Robert Gates. And then at 9 p.m. Obama will address a joint session of Congress to lay out his budget -- effectively his first State of the Union Address.
Biden Meeting With Hillary This Morning
Vice President Biden is meeting with Hillary Clinton for breakfast at the Naval Observatory, probably to discuss Hillary's recent overseas trip to Asia. He will then head to the White House to attend Obama's morning meetings with advisors, and will be at the Capitol tonight for Obama's speech.
Polls Show Continued High Approval Before Speech
The new CBS/New York Times poll gives President Obama a 63% approval rating and 22% disapproval, going into his first speech to Congress, and the new ABC/Washington Post poll put his approval at 68%-25%.
Poll: Public Expects Good Speech
A new CNN poll says that 28% of Americans expect Obama's speech tonight to be excellent, 44% expect it to be good, 19% say it will be okay and only 8% believe it will be poor or terrible. These high expectation are down slightly from where they were for his inauguration speech -- and like his approval ratings themselves, the decline seems to be fueled by Republicans dropping off as the honeymoon effect wears off.
Jindal Giving GOP Response
Governor Bobby Jindal (R-LA), who has rejected a small portion of the stimulus money that was headed for his state, has been tapped to give the Republican response to Obama's address. As the Washington Post points out: "In picking a governor to deliver tonight's speech, GOP leaders are acknowledging that without a majority in Congress, the big ideas necessary to rebuild their party are likely to come from state capitols."
Ted Kennedy To Be Absent From Obama's Speech
Ted Kennedy will not be attending Obama's speech to Congress tonight. A spokesperson told The Hill that Kennedy is staying involved in with health care policy, and is in "constant" contact with the White House and Congressional leaders and holding regular meeting on health reform.
NRCC To Members: We'll Help Those Who Help Themselves
Roll Call reports that the NRCC is seriously retooling its program for endangered incumbents, with the message that members will have to actively raise money for themselves if they expect the national party to also help out. An NRCC source told the paper: "If we are serious about winning elections, then there needs to be a commitment to increasing the level of accountability and putting an end to political bailouts."
Utah GOP Governor: Republican Leadership In D.C. "Inconsequential"
In an interview with the Washington Times, Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman (R) ridiculed the Republican leadership in Washington: "I have not met them. I don't listen or read whatever it is they say because it is inconsequential - completely."
















Perhaps we should conduct an exorcism to extract the hypocrisy that is eating away at Jindal's soul.
February 24, 2009 9:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wouldn't he have to leave politics at that point?
February 24, 2009 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know about that, but he certainly couldn't be a card-carrying member of the Republican party anymore.
February 24, 2009 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, this is surprising. Murdoch appologized for the racist cartoon last week in the NY Post. An outright apology, no waffling. He's never done this before as far as I know. Very surprising.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/24/rupert-apologizes-for-car_n_169386.html
February 24, 2009 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
>>Today I want to personally apologize to any reader who felt offended>>
Oh, please! That's straight out of the "how not to apologize while looking like you're apologizing" book.
Fake apology: I'm sorry if I said or did anything that you found objectionable.
Real apology: My actions were wrong and misguided. They caused pain. I am sorry I hurt you.
February 24, 2009 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, I am still surprised that he said what he said. Never has he done that before and it was not like the post's other non-apology, apology. I just thought it was an interesting development. Incidentally, I want to make it clear that I am not defending the guy. I think the guy is a criminal. Just pointing out the statement.
February 24, 2009 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Now that was an apology! His intent was sincere! Not that offensive verbal nonsense Bunning spit out about Justice Ginsburg.
February 24, 2009 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's what the very real threat of a national boycott of all things "Fox" by the NAACP will get you. Murdoch is a businessman, and that apology saved him millions.
February 24, 2009 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I said it yesterday and I'll say it again: Utah Gov. John Huntsman should be the next Repuglican nominee. And Democrats should do everything possible to stop that from happening.
February 24, 2009 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I like the guy already. That can't be good news.
February 24, 2009 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. Bad news. I saw him on cable yesterday. He was so engaging and charming and eloquent and . . . REASONABLE.
I swallowed hard and said "somebody please find a sex scandal on this guy and take him out!"
February 24, 2009 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
There must be some polygamy somewhere in his background, eh?
February 24, 2009 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't sweat it too much; as a resident of this Pretty Great State I can reassure you that he's reviled by the repub base. He's a diplomat at heart and they can't stand that in a man--if he hadn't had an "R" after his name he never would have been elected, even with the famous last name.
February 24, 2009 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
why?
because he seems semi-reasonable at times?
I have never understood wanting the opposition to pick someone who would be terrible. there is always a chance he might win, better that both sides put up reasonable (as possible) choices.
February 24, 2009 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's very charismatic. As a Democrat, that's the last thing I want to see in a republican.
February 24, 2009 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
From Wikipedia:
"Huntsman is also a self-proclaimed fan of the progressive rock genre and on July 30, 2007, attended a concert by progressive metal band Dream Theater. Later that day, Huntsman signed a proclamation creating "Dream Theater Day" on that date for the state of Utah. According to Dream Theater's website, Huntsman is a keyboard player. Huntsman also joined REO Speedwagon on the piano for two songs during their concert at the Utah State Fair on September 16, 2005."
God help us all...
February 24, 2009 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
And he is a member of the LDS, which is a death knell in the republican primaries. He and romney will be battling over the mormon support, which could open the way for rambo to win the nomination if the republican party is still around in 2012.
Anybody know his policy positions? Wikipedia is pretty weak on that.
Hopefully, the republican party will cease to exist in 2011 in any event. Let's see what happens after the slaughter in 2010.
February 24, 2009 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, no! It's even worse than I thought! Charismatic, reasonable and a renaissance man who appreciates the arts? In blood red Utah, he came out in favor of civil unions.
Hey, all of this means he'll never make it out of a repuglican primary. Phew!
February 24, 2009 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
But really, coming out in favor of civil unions is great in our eyes and is probably a smart position for a general election, but it's not one that wins a GOP primary.
February 24, 2009 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. That's why I said he'll never escape a repuglican primary.
February 24, 2009 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
REO Speedwagon = the ARTS?
yikes, that's scary...
February 24, 2009 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where did I say that?
The inability to read is what's really scary, don't you think?
February 24, 2009 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's difficult to believe that there is already THIS much maneuvering for 2012, but Mitt Romney's decision">http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/02/23/meet-the-undaunted-dozen/">decision to rush to the rescue of the 12 House Republicans that are facing DCCC attacks for their opposition to the stimulus is obviously designed to portray Romney as a chief opponent to Obama. The contrast to a potential rival like Crist is clear.
I agree with the above commentator that Dems should really hope for someone like Romney or Sanford or Palin over Huntsman or Crist.
February 24, 2009 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
oh romney and that endless checkbook of his. is there ever a situation in which he doesn't just run and break out the checkbook? somebody ought to remind him that it didn't do him much good last time around.
February 24, 2009 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree completely. Respectfully, but completely.
I suppose in the short term, it's nice to hope that the R's will continue to lose power, which will allow Obama and the D's to act more decisively and move more quickly to repair the damage. But, in the long run, our country is not served well by a morally and intellectually bankrupt Republican Party.
What we need are strong, intelligent players on 'both sides of the aisle'. The D's have not always been right. The R's have not always been wrong. And, the D's are not immune to the corrupting influence of power. At some point, there will be another Republican president, and I hope, when that day comes, that Republican will be smart, competent and pragmatic... and that his/her party reflects those qualities as well.
So, I hope that R's like Huntsman and Crist begin to take the reigns of the Republican Party and replace the Boehners and McConnells, as well as the Palins and Jindals. Yes, that will weaken the D's power and influence, but, it will also require that the D's stay sharp and true to their calling.
February 24, 2009 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Huntsman is a smart mo-fo. Forget Jindal, this guy is the real threat in 2012.
February 24, 2009 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. He's a real threat if he can escape the right-wing loony bin known as the republican primary.
February 24, 2009 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think he definitely can. He has loads of cash and he should play well in Florida/California. He'll be the nominee of the Schwarzenegger/Crist coalition, and that's uhhhh... not good for us.
February 24, 2009 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
You really think a mormon who favors civil unions can win a Republican primary?
February 24, 2009 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, he just needs the big WTA states and those places have a lot more moderate Republicans. He'll be pursuing the McCain strategy while Romney/Jindal pander for fundies in Iowa.
February 24, 2009 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
By 2012, the Schwarzeneger/Crist wing of the republican party will be called Democrats.
February 24, 2009 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
True, arnie was already contemplating switching parties. They will be either democrats or a new party.
February 24, 2009 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
If he's smart he won't run until 2016.
February 24, 2009 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
nah, 2016
February 24, 2009 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Repugs will be split going forward.
The "conservative" faction will continue to try to demonize Obama and work hard to make him fail at everything he attempts to do to repair the ravages of the Bush years.
The "moderate" faction will focus on the people's problems and pitch in to help turn the economy around ... oh wait. Those are Democrats.
February 24, 2009 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Those that are playing nice are planning to run in 2016, those who are fighting at every turn are setting up to run in 2012.
Also by cooperating with Obama now, it will give more weight to their criticisms of him down the line. Boehner and McConnell being the "Party of No" paints them as partisan hacks who will likely be marginalized sooner than later.
February 24, 2009 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
That actually makes sense. I still see crist as very formidable in 2016 regardless of the label of the party.
It really is telling that most of the gop outside the beltway is on board with obama and his economic plans. Even the critics are really just nit picking small portions of the stimulus and are behind the bulk of the plan. There is a major divide between inside the beltway and outside the beltway in the republican party. 2010 will be very interesting to see how this shakes out.
February 24, 2009 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. My gut says the R's lose more seats in both the senate and house in '10. The result will be a power shake-up within the party, and pragmatic players like Crist and Huntsman will begin to take the reigns.
February 24, 2009 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain Asks Obama To Give Up The White House
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=6345
February 24, 2009 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink