TPMDC
« Feinstein Wants Pentagon Investigation of Alleged Gitmo Burrowers | Home | You Won't Believe Who's Helping Push the Anti-Solis Campaign »

The Stimulus Debate Goes Goldilocks

Despite a rousing, psych-you-up speech from President Obama last night, the Senate is still facing the same core dilemma on the economic recovery bill.

Call it the Goldilocks problem. The 15 centrist senators still in talks on slicing about $100 billion from the bill have yet to hit on a package of spending cuts that's not too hot, not too cold, but just right to get the stimulus to 60 votes.

If they don't figure it out by day's end, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) will do what I suspected he'd ultimately have to -- move to cut off debate on the bill entirely, setting up a Sunday vote that will test all this talk of resistance from centrists on both sides.

One thing that bears repeating throughout today's Senate drama: This debate over trimming the stimulus is spending little time on what it means to cut as much as $13 billion in state education aid and $5.5 billion in surface transportation funding. The process is just moving too fast.

"It's very hard to get your case made in a fully substantive way," Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), one of the dozen-plus negotiators, admitted last night. (He had just finished asserting that "substance matters here, what's in the package matters a lot.")

So by all means, call your senator and holler if you saw something on the list of potential cuts that concerns you.


47 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Anybody know who the 15 senators are?

user-pic

The list seems to be: Evan Bayh, Michael Bennet, Kent Conrad, Mary Landrieu, Joe Lieberman, Claire McCaskill, Ben Nelson, Jeanne Shaheen, Mark Warner, Jim Webb and Mark Udall (Democrats) and Susan Collins, Mel Martinez, Olympia Snowe, Arlen Specter, George Voinovich (Republicans)

user-pic

Thank you. I was interested in the republicans in the group incidentally. That's not many. It looks like it's going to be a squeaker unfortunately.

user-pic

Claire McCaskill is such an idiot.

user-pic

I'm interested to know why you would single out claire from this list? But more than that, I think you probably mistake the political realities of Missouri for idiocy; her electoral coalition is extremely fractured, MO is one of the only states getting redder, and on bills like this she's pretty well damned either way. So from that perspective it makes a lot of sense for her to make a big show of trying to broker a third way. Which is what all fifteen of these people are really doing...it's not at all that they want certain cuts...it's just the optics.

user-pic

Keep in mind, too, that the Senate added on a bunch of stuff to the tune of about another $100B. If this group gets the cuts they want it will just bring the whole thing back to the size of the bill that passed the House. All the wailing and gnashing of teeth over how they're killing the bill is pretty overwrought.

user-pic

The only thing I can say to a comment like that, it takes one to know one.

user-pic

Thanks. Got letters out to our two on that list (Webb and Warner).

I'm appalled they are in that group of 15 rather than working to oppose the amendment, and I told them so.

user-pic

I believe this is a variation on Parkinson's law. Debate expands to fill whatever time is allotted for it. Enough already. Vote. If today's jobs report isn't enough to convince any wavering Senators, nothing will.

user-pic

Co-sign.

user-pic

Co-sign as well. It's nice to see you getting fed up, mbf. If they've pissed you off, it's time to move on this bill.

user-pic

I'm not really pissed off. There's a time and a place for debate. That's healthy. But there's also a time to get on with it. That time has come. Anyone who's not on board by now will never be on board.

user-pic

I'm not happy about the fact that the media is still so dominated by Republican talking points. I'm sitting here watching Andrea Greenspan and Margaret Carlson talk about the failure of Obama's bill. And you can bet the Sunday talkers will all ab out Obama's failure.

Meanwhile, in the real world, he's going to get a bill passed in the amount he requested and along the time frame he demanded. Where's the failure here? And, by that, I mean what the fuck is wrong with these talking heads in the MSM?

user-pic

Six months from now, what do you think people will remember, that some blabbermouth talking head spewed some sort of nonsense, or that Obama got the bill passed? I'm pretty sure it will be the latter.

user-pic

Cosign.

user-pic

It wouldn't be the first time Obama has made the pundits look like fools.

user-pic

If the Congressional Dems would just go on all the cable TeeVee shows and hammer the points President Obama made last night (Stimulus *is* spending, that's the point; there are too tax cuts in the bill, targeted to people who might credibly go out and spend it; changing the federal fleet to more green ones and weatherizing homes is an awesome three-fer: create jobs, decrease energy consumption and wean us off foreign oil; 36 Rethugs voted for a bill that is tax-cuts only: same old, failed policy) then people might actually learn about the other view point.

As it is, Rethugs and their media enablers are the only ones talking -- ceding the debate and then crying about the consequences is just way too stupid.

President Obama cannot show up on all these shows going up against every Rethug cong critter -- the numbers of them can be matched only by the dems in congress. Especially, house members who are now free, need to get their mugs on TeeVee and drill in the sane viewpoint.

user-pic

Adding, President Obama did make one big mistake, Chris Matthews is right about this: he should have explained the highlights of the proposed bill and clearly enunciated their benefits. It still may not be too late for him to do that. He needs to take one half hour of network time and explain the big picture of the bill and the tangible benefits.

user-pic

The problem with trying to be "Bipartisan" is that when the other side spews a bunch of lies, you can't call them on it.

He tried this strategy, it didn't work. Now it's time to try something else. We've got 58 senate seats or whatever. No big deal.

user-pic

Let the Rethuglicans filibuster. I'd love to hear grumpy Grampy McCain read the Yellow Pages. He'd like it too. He didn't have a phone book for five and a half years. He and his ilk will shoot craps with working people's lives and livelihoods.

user-pic

I agree! I'm so sick of seeing Harry Reid roll over and play dead every time they threaten a filibuster. I would love to see Mitch McConnell reading the phone book on C-SPAN. I know nobody watches S-SPAN, but can't you see the montage on all the networks? Little clock down in the corner to show the passage of time, maybe a split screen with the other side showing lines at unemployment offices.

user-pic

Gloves off. These are modern-day Herbert Hoovers, all to happy to send the economy over a precipice if they don't get what they want. It's long past time to call them out on it.

Have a cloture vote. Then let anyone who votes against cloture have it with a barrage of ads and grassroots protest. If any of them are Dems, run a candidate against them in the primary.

This is about saving America from a second Great Depression. Why don't these people realize it's not business as usual? And why haven't they yet been held to account?

user-pic

So by all means, call your senator and holler if you saw something on the list of potential cuts that concerns you.

All of the cuts concern me. I don't think these centerist jackasses get the concept that the States are falling apart and badly need Cash simply to stay in business. The money in the bill isn't even enough to get that done.

What's going to happen is that Obama is going to push even more money through in budget appropiations. But at least 600K people lost their jobs in January, and we're not close to the bottom.

If Obama wants to play the Bipartasan game, he should dump House and Senate GOP and instead go to the State GOP - governors like Arnold, Jindal and Crist. Not just them, but key Dem Govs like Rendell, Strickland, Kaine, Perdue, Schweitzer, Nixon, etc. Call them into the White House for a big photo shoot, and then send them back out to their Home States and also on the airwaves to pimp that it's needed.

The Obama Team seems to have lost sight of the Ground Game, and that there are valuable people out there.

John

user-pic

insightful point.


user-pic

Remember the good old days when the strum and drang was over a $16 billion stimulus package? That's one-six billion.

Lawdy lawdy, we sure have come far from 1993.

user-pic

When did we get to the point that 60 was the magical number? Here I always thought it took a majority. We're moving the goal posts.

http://www.pufferfishblog.com/

user-pic

I guess then the "procedural vote" the news outlets are referring to is a cloture motion not a paygo waiver which raises the question, if the Monday headline reads "Senate Republicans Block Final Passage of Stimulus Bill" will read have the guts to keep the bill on the Floor so we see the same headline on Tuesday, Wedenesday.....as long as necessary?

user-pic

I second Elana's emotion on calling Senators but I'd add tax cuts to your bitch lists.

If the question is waste and size, let's cut the re-inflate the housing bubble tax cut which ballooned from 18 billion at passage to 36 billion the day after

user-pic

I think the problem is lots of congressmen really don't get why quick and massive government spending is necessary. They're so myopic about the budget (except for military spending of course) that they can't connect it in their minds with the economic effects. At least I think that's what's going on with the centrists. The conservatives have a short term goal of defeating Obama at whatever he tries and damn the consequences, and a long term goal to prevent New Deal-like economics from working and conservative philosophy being debunked for a generation again.

user-pic
except for military spending of course
Which is what REALLY PISSES ME OFF. The enormous expense of the Iraq War has always been treated by these "fiscally prudent" numbskulls as though it were funded by free money magically appearing from outer space, or something. (Of course they care even less about the enormous waste of lives...)
user-pic

Jon Stewart did a great job last night highlighting the gross hypocrisy on display by the Republicans fighting domestic spending initiatives while lavishing spending on Iraq with zero accountability.

user-pic

I particularly liked seeing Vitter ranting about STD. Stewart was definitely on his game.

user-pic

Glad you left out, governing. Republicans have stated at their retreat they have no interest in governing, only in vilifying and undermining their way back into power.

user-pic

The Congressional Progressives bark remains less fearsome than the Blue Dog's bite

If this thing is heading for the Senate side toilets, might as well join in

user-pic

One of the biggest problems here is that Harry Reid as Majority Leader is a joke. He leads nothing, he leads nobody and he leads nowhere.

Somebody ought to make him read Robert Caro's book on how to "lead" the Senate, Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson. Maybe Harry would absorb a nugget or two and figure out how to get something done.

user-pic

No kidding.

How many times has Reid made a threat only to back peddle on it later? Last night it only took about 2 hours.

Here's some advice for Harry Reid: Don't make threats you are not prepared to back up. Your poker face is not that good.

user-pic

That's why they call him Harry the Flaccid. 100% useless, a box of paperclips is more effective.

user-pic

Didn't the Three Bears chase Goldilocks out of the house at the end of the story?

user-pic

I really wish Al Franken was in the Senate right now. He'd make short work of the Repubs.

user-pic

Have you heard the guy give a speech or a presser or debate? Just curious.

user-pic

Not sure about Harry Reid being the biggest problem.

Unfortunately, we're looking for synergy, democratic synergy between all governing bodies, executive, legislative and judicial all at once and it's going to take time.

user-pic

In a broad institutional sense, I couldn't agree more. The Congress has after over a decade of partisan warfare become barely viable but you have to start somewhere and if the Leadership cannot respond in the face of dire crisis, what good is it?

Now is the time

user-pic

I don't disagree. I just don't know enough about the inside Washington process to confidently identify Harry Reid as the definitive problem.

Moreover, I don't know who would be better. Speaking of which, while it may seem obvious, what constitutes better? (Just saying someone who doesn't cave isn't going to cut it.)

user-pic

I think the leadership should have a good cop and a bad cop. The R's have figured this out. The leader should be the good cop and Reid is fine in that role. He needs a bad cop to work with him and the Dems don't have one.

user-pic
Dear Sen Feinstein:

I applaud your efforts on behalf of the President's Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Package. Recent developments or lack thereof in the Senate Floor debate concern me greatly however.

First, the so-called compromise discussions led by Sens Nelson and Collins would cut 40 billion in aid to the States, money which as you know, is desperately needed in California

Looking forward in the event Sunday's planned cloture vote is not successful, I worry that the Democratic Leadership will pull the Legislation from the Floor. In this event, I ask that you urge Sen Reid to schedule cloture votes seriatem until the Senate musters the will to do what it was elected to do and address this economic catastrophe that Republican fiscal policies have caused

The purpose of extended debate in the Senate is to delay swift action so that important issues of the day may receive the public attention they deserve, not as has become the Senate practice of recent years to avoid debate altogther.

If the Republican Senators wish to fiddle while our economy burns, the whole nation should see their handiwork

Thank you.

user-pic

Have to love Senator Prostitute railing against the Devil Acorn with his latest Amendment. Nothing but a bunch of lies.


John

user-pic

If they don't figure it out by day's end, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) will do what I suspected he'd ultimately have to -- move to cut off debate on the bill entirely, setting up a Sunday vote that will test all this talk of resistance from centrists on both sides.

At this point, I wonder how Democrats can support this stupid anymore? Harry Reid and Joe blow turned into crap that nobody should vote for.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Elana
Schor

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Capital Wire

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address