Who's Psyched For That Fiscal Responsibility Summit?
President Obama recently announced that he would hold a fiscal responsibility summit at the end of this month, with a particular focus on the long-term funding shortage that faces Social Security and Medicare.
And who's bound to be high on the guest list? None other than Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH), who abruptly pulled out of contention to become Commerce Secretary today. Not to mention that when Obama releases his maiden budget proposal -- also likely to come before month's end -- the leader of the opposition will be none other than Gregg, the senior Republican on the Budget Committee.
All together now, everyone: Awkward!
"It really is going to be very interesting" when the budget debate pits Gregg against the Obama team, budget expert Robert Bixby told me. Bixby is executive director of the Concord Coalition, a nonprofit fiscal watchdog.
"I actually could never quite figure out why Gregg had accepted the Cabinet position in the first place, since it was obvious that [he and the president] had some very fundamental disagreements about fiscal policy," Bixby added.
The fact that Gregg spent less than 10 days as the Commerce Secretary-designate helps "mitigate the awkwardness," as Bixby put it, because it's unlikely that the GOP senator was sitting in on too many strategy meetings during his brief tenure as a Cabinet nominee.
But the unmistakable tension inherent in Gregg's sudden withdrawal is bound to resurface during budget season. Since almost the moment he arrived in the Senate 14 years ago, Gregg has been the go-to guy for Republican fiscal hawks. It's unlikely that he'll be able to avoid fierce confrontations over Obama's budget plan, especially if the president follows through on promises to assume the expiration of the tax cuts pushed through under Bush.
For the moment, however, the question is whether Gregg will "un-recuse" himself and return to Congress to vote on his almost-boss' stimulus bill. His spokeswoman did not return a request for comment on the issue.


















Heh. awkward, indeed.
February 12, 2009 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, he may have been the go-to guy for fiscal hawks, but this little episode has, I suspect, really damaged his credibility at this point.
Let's say he adopts a very fiscally hawkish tone, and mounts a vigorous fight against the budget. Well, he even admitted that he couldn't work with Obama, so this opposition, instead of seeming principled, as it may have in the past, will simply be chalked up as just more Republican partisanship. He's really done himself a disservice. In a lose-lose situation here.
February 12, 2009 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seems to me he should have just resigned from the Senate all together. He's more than a lame duck. He's about to be abused by Republicans and Democrats alike.
February 12, 2009 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Senator Dilettante? Senator Dilettante? You're needed to actually decide on a vote this time! McConnell wants to know if you've made a decision, if not we'll happily provide you one!"
February 12, 2009 11:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes but it will be principled republican opposition. They are going to harp about entitlement spending adnausuem. Every time the press will report on Judd as the 'good republican' who withdrew from the cabinet over principles.
Obama will be painted as a big government tax and spend liberal (when he actually has avoided this label pretty successfully so far). Gregg is trying reestablish the conservative bonafides and work to undermine the coming entitlement changes, particularly the expansion of Medicaid. Gregg's new found celebrity and Obama validation by having nominated him bolsters his bargaining position.
Yes it will be chalked up to partisanship, but that is the point. One party will be against taxes, and the responsible party will raise them. Lets hope the electorate's new found maturity holds up over the next four years.
February 12, 2009 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
That will be tough to do - he campaigned with tax CUTS as part of his platform. His suggestions for the stimulus bill included tax cuts, which he later suggested he should have let the Republicans propose so that they could take credit for it.
I'm not saying it's impossible - most of the media has demonstrated(quell surprise!) they're happy to proliferate the Republican talking points on the issue.
Personally, I think any such attempts will leave him a nice opportunity for a strong rebuttal.
All he has to do is say, "Now wait a minute, that's garbage, that's on the edge of libel. I would be happy to follow in Dwight Eisenhower's footsteps, and raise tax rates on the rich. We can eliminate any budget deficits for this year, and begin paying down the national debt, quickly, but Congressional Republicans won't let that happen, so I haven't even proposed it."
February 13, 2009 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
The thing is he will have to raise taxes. It doesn't really matter what he wants. Demographics and deficits require it.
I'm hoping he soaks the rich, but results aren't promising yet.
February 13, 2009 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is rapidly becoming apparent that while President Obama ran a brilliant campaign he has yet to learn how to govern. I am afraid that his attempts to charm Republicans to cooperation are doomed and it displays a troubling narcissism on the President's part if he fails to accept this patent fact.
February 12, 2009 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, Gregg's erratic behavior is proof that Obama does not know how to govern.
February 12, 2009 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
What are you talkin' about? You're judgement is based on less than one month. Even workers at McDonald's get more time to prove themselves.
February 12, 2009 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
With all due respect, shut the fuck up. You ill informed dolt.
February 12, 2009 10:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
omg omg omg it's like omg. Omg did you hear who he invited to the party. I can't believe it. Heidi and LC at the same party. omg omg omg.
Once again Mrs Schor finds the lowest common denominator.
February 12, 2009 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
With all due respect, I think you're mis-characterizing the issue. Personality and ideological differences ARE an issue, and recent events surrounding Sen. Gregg, while filled with drama, will have an impact on the discussion.
And it will not simply be because the media is suggesting that will be the case.
February 13, 2009 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink