CBS' Chip Reid Asks Gibbs: Is This The Official Tone Toward Cheney?
Here's yet another sign that Washington media is still wired to a great extent for a playing field of GOP dominance. During today's White House press conference, CBS correspondent Chip Reid asked Robert Gibbs if it was appropriate for him to attack Dick Cheney:
Reid: Can I ask you, when you referred to the former Vice President, that was a really hard-hitting, kind of sarcastic response you had. This is a former Vice President of the United States. Is that the attitude -- is that the sanctioned tone toward the former Vice President of the United States from this White House now?
Gibbs: Sometimes I ask forgiveness rather than for permission, Chip. But no, I hope my sarcasm didn't mask the seriousness of the answer with which I addressed Ed -- that for seven-plus years, the very perpetrators that the Vice President says he's concerned about weren't brought to justice.
Now let's consider the full context here. Dick Cheney did an interview with CNN in which he went out of his way to repeatedly attack the new White House, saying they were putting the country at risk of a new terror attack. But the question here is whether it's appropriate for the Obama Administration to fire back in response -- that it's Obama's people who are accused of showing insufficient respect to the office?


















Is Chip on the RNC payroll? What a positively stupid question to ask. Whatever happened to the tradition of not criticizing the current Administration from the previous occupants?
Yeah...thought not. So Chipster should STFU with stupid questions and stop being so dense: Gibbs didn't attack that Cheney--he responded in kind.
March 16, 2009 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously. It's not so important what Cheney says, 'cause you know that whatever Cheney actually says, his thought balloon is just going "Go F#$% yerself". But it'd be nice if the creep were less creepy to the Leader of the Free World, who happens to be a war sitting president.
March 16, 2009 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Al Gore on Cheney-
.."There was then, there is now and there would have been regardless of what Bush did, a threat of terrorism that we would have to deal with. But instead of making it better, he has made it infinitely worse. We are less safe because of his policies. He has created more anger and righteous indignation against us as Americans than any leader of our country in the 228 years of our existence as a nation -- because of his attitude of contempt for any person, institution or nation who disagrees with him. "...
Al Gore on Cheney again-
In his second major policy speech in three months, former vice president Al Gore took aim yesterday at what he said was the Bush administration's exploitation of the terrorist attacks of 2001 to justify an undemocratic suspension of domestic freedoms and to create a government built on "secrecy and deception."
"Rather than defending our freedoms, this administration has sought to abandon them. Rather than accepting our traditions of openness and accountability, this administration has opted to rule by secrecy and unquestioned authority. Its assaults on our core democratic principles have only left us less free and less secure," he said.
... In both cases, Gore said, the administration has "recklessly put our country in grave and unnecessary danger."
March 16, 2009 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Big difference between Gore and Cheney: Gore was telling the truth.
March 16, 2009 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another difference: Gore was nearly universally derided for these remarks (and any others he made) by the Press Corpse. The White House didn't have to reply-- their lackeys did it for them.
March 16, 2009 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Point taken, but Gore didn't start this in the first or second year of the administration's reign of terror.
Nevertheless, it wasn't Eric's point that Cheney was out of line, merely that there still seems to be a knee-jerk and odd attitude of deference to Cheney, as though he hadn't bashed the administration repeatedly over the weekend, or ruled recklessly and absolutely during his time in a secure and undisclosed location.
Gibbs, Cheney, Obama, and the rest are all big boys and girls. Right now, Cheney is defining his job as the partisan attack dog we expect from vice presidential candidates, and less so from senior statesmen. If we imagine that Cheney is motivated by patriotism rather than by partisanship, we can assume the same of Gibbs and Gore as well.
March 17, 2009 1:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
What a f*cking asshole. When will they break up the media conglomerates and start getting some balance in the press? What an asshole.
Hey chippie, F*ck You.
March 16, 2009 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Remember: anything goes, as long as it's a Republican we're talking about.
The fact that Cheney's attack is unprecedented is irrelevant. The fact that Cheney repeatedly contradicted himself in that interview is irrelevant.
THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS THAT ROBERT GIBBS SAID SOMETHING REPUBLICANS PERCEIVED AS SNOTTY.
March 16, 2009 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Word!
March 16, 2009 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's a good kitty! Excellent point.
There will be some extra cat nip for you tonight.
March 17, 2009 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
What? A guy called "Chip" taking up for Republicans? This is surely an unprecedented occurance in the history of white Anglo-Saxon protestantism.
March 16, 2009 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chip. Or, Sparky.
One of the administrator's at a school I worked at, in the "Deep South" (as opposed to the "Mid-South") was named Sparky.
March 16, 2009 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, hey -- watch how you dis the name "Sparky"! It just so happens that Sparky the Wonder Penguin is a great favorite of mine.
"Sparky the Penguin is among the best of a new generation," according to the San Francisco Examiner. So there!
March 16, 2009 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
We had another administrator named "Buster". Buster, Sparky and Chip!
Not a penguin between them, either.
That I know of, at least.
March 16, 2009 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Still waiting for Cheney to earn that respect.
March 16, 2009 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Kick 'em in the balls some MORE!
Maybe that was a little bit of over exuberence on my part. Sorry.
March 16, 2009 5:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is something that these so called journalists can miss the lies leading to the Iraq War and the greatest financial mess since the Depression but they are able to hear every nuance of "tone".
March 16, 2009 5:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe Cheney should have shown respect for the f*cking office when he used his position to sanction torture.
March 16, 2009 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does this mean that we are henceforth not permitted to speak disparagingly of the convicted and incarcerated... oops, I meant controversial and closely-watched vice-president Spiro Agnew, of Nixon "Silent Majority" fame?
Oh, and one more thing, Chip... the "office of the Vice-President" is currently occupied by one Vice-President Joseph Biden. Gibbs was not referring to the occupant of that office, Vice-President Biden. Dick Cheney vacated that office by law, some months back.
By whose authority do you determine the "tone", by which one must speak of Mr. Cheney? Les Moonves?
Fuck, man.
March 16, 2009 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. And as others have noted, he could have shown respect for the Presidency by getting the fuck off his demagogic soap box when his 8 long, ruinous years finally came to such a catastrophic end.
March 17, 2009 6:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
That is so freaking true. Shouldn't he be relaxing in his fortified castle in some Haliburton stronghold or something?
March 17, 2009 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, and you might have kindly added,
"crazed, super-arrogant, self-indulgent snake that he is."
March 18, 2009 1:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I guess CBS hiring the top GOP & pro-rightwing settler extremist as Senior VP is now showing its affects.
March 16, 2009 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Time for Stewart to pick on another network. Let's hear him do a rant on the appropriately deferential tone to be used with Cheney.
March 16, 2009 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Geez. Chip Reid is about as much of a tool as Chip Diller.
March 16, 2009 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, Gibbs' answer was pretty much pitch-perfect.
And was Cheney respecting the office when he told Sen. Leahy to go f*** himself?
March 16, 2009 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
that too
March 16, 2009 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chip Reid's a hypocrite. So it was okay for him LAST WEEK to refer to Democrats "raising their ugly heads?"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/12/chip-reid-moans-asks-gibb_n_174392.html
Up yours, Chip!
March 16, 2009 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Words cannot express how much I hate the Village media.
March 16, 2009 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Infuriating. Self-righteous indignation fits best on hypocrites.
March 16, 2009 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
CBS haz News?
March 16, 2009 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Penis Cheney is clearly a dick. However, what I would prefer that the spokesperson for Obama use the language of someone who is ACTUALLY changing the tone in Washington. I think that Gibbs could have responded as follows:
*****
The Bush administration did not begin on 9/12. It began 9 months earlier. It is important that we not forget this fact. Concerning the Vice President's comments on the economy, he and President Bush were at the helm of the economic ship of state for eight years. Here is where we are today. We are following a different course.
*****
There is no direct "blame game" which is code for "don't hold people to account". However, it is clear who is in fact TO BLAME for where we are. The American people can figure this stuff out all by themselves. You don't have to hit them over the head with the obvious. But you do have to allude to the obvious.
March 16, 2009 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does someone really need to remind Chip about Dick "Dick" Cheney and the rest of the Bush cabal's "sanctioned attitude" towards Former Vice President (and Nobel Prize winner) Al Gore?
Oh yeah, he's fat, I forgot.
March 16, 2009 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Big Dick Cheney is no longer VP and he should know his role, get on his knees, defer to and shine the shoes of new President.
March 16, 2009 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did Jeff Ballabon write his talking points?
March 16, 2009 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Umm....Is this the same Chip Reid who told John Oliver of the Daily Show that "people have the attention span of gnats these days", apparently his "official tone" towards his listeners?
March 16, 2009 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who the frack is Dick Cheney? The former King of the United States? No one had an ounce of respect for him when he was in office and no once owes him anything now.
March 16, 2009 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nobody in the media, and least of all Chip Reid, would think twice about running a story critical of what VP Biden did or said. But suddenly, we have to treat ex-VP Cheney as if he were some kind of exalted figure? Sorry Chip Reid, Cheney may look like the undead to us all but we don't have to quiver before him as you are doing.
And this is the same Chip Reid who complained last week about Democrats raising their "ugly heads". What is he doing, auditioning for a new gig at Fox?
March 16, 2009 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seems to me that people are missing the essential hypocrisy here. At this point in the Bush administration, Cheney and Bush still had five and a half months in which to identify and protect us from the attack on September 11. They failed utterly. whether or not their actions since kept further attacks from occurring is immaterial. THEY FAILED TO PROTECT US. A day late, a dollar short, slamming the barn door after the horse ran off. Gibbs does make the secondary point that they failed to catch the perpetrators, but their initial failure should be front and center in any discussion of Cheney's comments.
March 16, 2009 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not only does this inane argument about keeping us safe since 9/11 ignore the first 8 months of Bush's presidency, it also dishonestly ignores the anthrax attacks that killed 5 and sickened many more.
Unfortunately, you can't expect much more from Dick - he's obviously a sociopath who belongs in a room with soft walls being studied for the rest of his twisted life. But when someone from the MSM parrots this BS, we should tear them a new one every time.
March 20, 2009 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Chip Reid? Talk about giving the people of America "substance". Ask him what he thought of Bush doing shtick about WMD at some big D.C. dinner a few years back while American servicemen were dying in battle. Oh, and Chip, "shtick" is not that thing you have up your ass.
blueintheblueridge.blogspot.com
March 16, 2009 6:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is the impact of the new right slant on news at CBS. However, the news editors did not have to work too hard to bend Chip Reid...
At NBC he always tried to belittle Dems while spinning Republican interviews and airtime.
He's the perfect foil for CBS, they are so desperate for ratings, if they didn't have CSI and all of its franchises, they would not have programming...Survivor 24!!
Now they are slicing up low information consumers with the bias slant from Reid...the sad thing is he has company in the WH Press Corp...Call them out!!!
March 16, 2009 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am more upset about the John King interview and Chip Reids stupidity than I am about what the former Vice President said. I mean I expect the former VP to be a piece of shit, but the behavior by the press in their fawning all over this douchebag is just unacceptable. Why do these people have jobs?? Do these guys in their stupid little minds think they are the next Edward R Murrow? God-I hate these hacks.
March 16, 2009 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
That interview you mention is a disgusting, disgraceful insult to the public that supposedly is being served.
The guy that interviewed Cheney should be stripped and forced to stand naked, ice water poured on him ...
March 16, 2009 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hasn't anyone informed Chip Reid et al that no one -- including former president George W Bush -- sees Dick Cheney as anything other than a nasty, nutty old crank?
March 16, 2009 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chip Reid : Why don't you ask Cheney about his torture program and his death squads ?
Chip Reid : are you scared of the ex-VP ? Will he do something to you, get you fired, get you sent to a remote local affiliate, if you ask him about his death squads and torture ?
Chip Reid : Why don't you ask Cheney how come 'Bin Laden' is STILL running around uncaught and undead ?
Chip Reid : it is 2009, not 2002 any more. It's OK to not cheerlead for Cheney and his incompetent bumbling.
JHC these guys are pathetic.
March 16, 2009 9:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Contra Kleefeld, Cheney didn't "go out of his way" to attack the Obama administration. He answered the questions presented to him directly. E.g., When asked by CNN's correspondent if Obama's policies would make us less safe, he said, "I do." Then when asked to elaborate, he elaborated.
Obama's mouthpiece did not answer substantively, but engaged in a juvenile personal attack. That is what Obama is, and that is what his people are. They don't know how to govern. They don't know how to even argue intelligently (note Obama's clinical dependence on the Teleprompter, and the series on non-sequiturs, arbitrary assertions, and straw men deployed in Obama's press conference.) All they can do is campaign. But the supply of idiots getting excited by Hope & Change is running low.
Little character, and little active intelligence. Worthless individuals.
March 16, 2009 10:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Questions for Cheney :
1.) Why do you not keep quiet and out of sight ?
2.) Why did you fail to catch Bin Laden in seven years ?
3.) Why, after 19 out of twenty airplane highjackers were found to be Saudis, did we see our president in the news holding hands with, and kissing, the King of Saudi Arabia ?
4.) Did you run the torture program and the death squads from the white house ? What are the details ?
5.) Why, after running the country exactly the way you liked for eight years, the economy went into a nose dive ?
6.) Why does our country owe China $1,000,000,000,000 ?
Anyone who says Gibbs is out of line needs a few reminders of how we got where we are.
March 16, 2009 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought it was only in Latin America that war criminals received respect and deference. Chip Reid and Jake Tapper are first-class nasty pieces of work. Robert Gibbs earns my respect for keeping his cool with them.
March 16, 2009 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fuck You Joe.
Fuck You Dick.
Fuck You Dubya.
Fuck You Bum's Rush Rumsfeld.
Fuck You (Former Bush Admin Member).
Fuck You Chip, and all you other MSM tools who perpetuate the puke fest that you call journalism.
Jon Stewart needs to launch a "Bitch Slap Tour" of all the MSM hubs. There's only a few left because the fuckers all own one another. Kind of like the old monarchies. I suppose if we do nothing they'll all just inbreed themselves out of existence. God knows (so does Darwin, ha!) the genetic defects are just get worse every year.
March 16, 2009 11:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some one needs take a sledgehammer to this unreliable machine that has become the voice of the right and breakup the conglomerates that rule the news. When politicians kowtow to the likes of Blimpbaugh, Hearsay News, Rupedirt Murdererdoc and the other propagandists they are denying their oath of office.
GW, Dick and the rest have committed crimes against this Nation and the World they must be brought to justice for us to really be able raise our heads inn the World community. The Media is the vehicle that historically exposed wrong doing by our leaders but if they are still in the pocket of the Fascists that just left power we won't get far.
Remake the Fourth Estate and free thinking investigators will ferret the crimes and prepatraitors(sic) out!
March 17, 2009 12:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
user-pic
Questions for Cheney :
1.) Why do you not keep quiet and out of sight ?
Like the loser carter or fat bill
2.) Why did you fail to catch Bin Laden in seven years ? why will obama fail to catch him also?
We cant find law breakers in our own country.
3.) Why, after 19 out of twenty airplane highjackers were found to be Saudis, did we see our president in the news holding hands with, and kissing, the King of Saudi Arabia ? Duh Oil Ask jimmy "the geek" carter
4.) Did you run the torture program and the death squads from the white house ? What are the details ? I hope and I am happy Obama is continuing it
5.) Why, after running the country exactly the way you liked for eight years, the economy went into a nose dive ? Wrong after 6 years things were great till the lefty loons took over and destroyed the economy on purpose to get the Manchurian candidate in.
6.) Why does our country owe China $1,000,000,000,000 ? Ask both parties losers
Anyone who says Gibbs is out of line needs a few reminders of how we got where we are.
March 17, 2009 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd watch using that "loser" term too much if I were you.
Now run along and go back to your podstation.
March 17, 2009 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey losers Bush and Cheney are gone cant you focus on anything else or are you part of the lefty loon attack squads that go after any one that does not agree with ya. Number one liar obumma has destroyed this country in two years along with your bosses the dnc and nancy p. What a disgrace you all are. I feel real bad for you. Let it go Bush is gone. its ok man really get off the ledge lefties.
March 17, 2009 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Strikes me that Chippy asked a completely fair question, albeit precisely the type of leading, idiotic nonsense that gives journalism its degraded status in America.
Strikes me that Gibbs' answer nailed it, both the sarcasm and untangling it into language the Chipster might understand.
March 17, 2009 1:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Villagers Still Love Them Some Bush!
Since they never, don't, won't, can't intellectually think anything negative about W, they don't understand anyone else criticizing their Beautiful Leader or his puppet master.
March 17, 2009 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I noted that on Politico the other day the readers were praising Penis Cheney's dick right to the stars. They can't get enough.
March 17, 2009 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
First, why do grown men use names like Chip? He should get a wedgee just for that, unless his real first name is Leslie or Percy or Isuck, then I understand.
Second, Chip, or Isuck or whatever his name is has shown that he is an empty suit all his career. He's a notch above the Sham-wow guy and just even with Michael Steele.
Third, Cheney. Who cares.
March 17, 2009 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, I'm 52, and I still like using "Skip" better than my given name "Walter" ;*)
But I didn't come here to talk about that, I came here to post this info from Chip's bio:
>>His career in broadcast journalism began at ABC News as a field producer in Washington (1988-89).
Previously, Reid practiced law, first as Counsel to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee (1982-86) and then as a litigation and lobbying specialist at a major Washington, D.C. law firm (1986-88).
which I think doesn't say much for his journalistic credentials.
March 17, 2009 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
These people are such wastes of DNA and brain matter. The republicans call the MSM "liberal"... then use the "liberal media" to defend Cheney..... hold on I just puked in my mouth..
March 21, 2009 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink