TPMDC
« Science Adviser Holds Update: Not Martinez, Not Vitter | Home | Leahy Likens Palestinians to His Irish Ancestors, Urges Rejection of Kyl Amendment »

Coleman Camp Insists On More Ballots Being In Play

The Coleman camp is reacting to the discovery of only 89 "3-A" rejected ballots -- absentee ballots that contained registration forms inside the inner secrecy envelope, rather than immediately within the outer envelope a -- and insisting that the real number is much bigger.

The short version: In order to win, Coleman needs to expand the universe of countable ballots. But this expansion was much smaller than some expected, out of the 1,500 ballots that were searched. At his post-court press conference, Coleman legal spokesman Ginsberg boasted that the search "found between 100 and 150 that were wrongly rejected and should be put in. so that gives you an increasing idea that the universe of ballots with which we're dealing continues to fluctuate."

What Ginsberg is relying on is the addition of 72 more envelopes that had incomplete registration cards, and are unlikely to be included under the court's strict standards for letting in new ballots -- a point that the Coleman camp seems sure to appeal.

Two-thirds of the 89 came from pro-Coleman counties, but the sample of votes is by itself too small to provide much of a swing for him -- and that's assuming they do break for Coleman. It's also likely that some of these envelopes will have other flaws with them, thus shrinking the pool even further.

So obviously, Ginsberg wants to be able to expand the universe of votes as much as possible, declaring: "89 plus 72 with -- apparently have some deficiencies in them, whatever that may mean."

(Ginsberg presser c/o The Uptake.)


6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Bell v. Gannaway says absentee voting is a privilege and that the state is allowed to set stringent standards and that voters who seek to vote under these provisions must be held to a strict compliance therewith.

Furthermore it was found that if absentee ballots are erroneously allowed they cannot be un-counted. The correct time to challenge it is before it is counted by a representative poll watcher.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/3/9/164830/7632/360/706465

user-pic

Poor Normy!

*sniff*

IT'S NO FAIR!1!

*wahhh*
~

user-pic

An excellent explanation of Bell v. Gannaway can be found at

http://www.minnpost.com/ericblackblog/2009/03/09/7226/back_to_the_future_how_mabel’s_messed-up_vote_in_1975_could_decide_the_coleman-franken_contest

I think we need a new category for awards at the end of the year. Maybe "Most Creative Counting" or "Don't Bother Me with the Math.." The runaway winner would be Ginsberg-in-the-hallway.

user-pic

Yes, thanks for this explanation!

user-pic

ginsberg is a jerkoff lawyer that is an apt face of the republic party. Any time they need a clown to subvert justice and mess up the process they send him in. Hey ginsberg, you are going down in history as an example of douchbag lawyers. You know, as in "He's just a ginsberg" to describe an abulance chaser. Fuck you, ginsberg.

user-pic

GOP - Party of Hypocrisy. You can take it to the bank.

Since you don't have any money and wouldn't put it in the bank if you did have it, thanks to them.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Elana
Schor

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address