TPMDC
« Senate Intel Committee Announces Broad Investigation of CIA Interrogations | Home | "Not a Harry and Louise Moment, a Thelma and Louise Moment" »

Coleman Camp On Defense As Team Franken Brings Up Ballot-Vetoes

You get the feeling that Norm Coleman's legal team really doesn't like the appearance of having spent five weeks in court to get more of their own ballots counted, in the name of enfranchising all voters, and now having to watch the Franken attorneys take a turn at bat.

In court just before, Franken lawyer Kevin Hamilton was going over some rejected absentee ballots with Jeffrey Cox, the elections director for the Democratic stronghold of Duluth. On one envelope, Hamilton asked if the ballot had been rejected by the Coleman campaign, under the state Supreme Court's controversial decision to give each campaign a veto power over individual ballot envelopes during the review this past December.

At this point, Team Coleman objected to Hamilton's attempt to establish this, based on the forms in front of him.

"I'll take that back," Hamilton said. "All we know here is that someone named Frederick Knaak signed the rejection form, correct?"

Frederick "Fritz" Knaak is one of Norm Coleman's lawyers, and actually headed up his effort during the recount proper. Apparently, Team Coleman doesn't want it to be aired out that they'd personally stopped individual ballots from being counted.

Hamilton later asked Cox if a ballot should be counted. At that point, lead Coleman lawyer Joe Friedberg objected. Hamilton then pointed out that Friedberg had spent five weeks asking local election officials if ballots he'd picked out should be counted. Hamilton then continued asking the question, with just a slight modification in his phrasing to make it clear that he was asking for Cox's individual, professional judgment.

Also, Coleman spokesman Ben Ginsberg really upped the rhetoric at his afternoon press conference, giving his rebuttals to Team Franken an expressly partisan tone today.

Ginsberg insisted that the Franken camp's math -- which alleges that Coleman has only offered complete and valid evidence on perhaps 20 rejected absentee ballots -- is all wrong, and the number of viable cases is really in the low thousands.

"Well, having heard Mr. Elias' version of the math in this case, I think I really do have a greater insight into how the Democrats in Washington have passed a $798 billion bailout bill, a $3 trillion budget, and now plan on telling us they're shrinking the deficit at the same time," Ginsberg said. "And so the fuzzy math of Washington seems to have winded its way here to Minnesota."

In other words, you can't trust the Franken lawyers' arguments because they're a bunch of dishonest, shifty Democrats.


11 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I'd like to say that Norm Coleman is a putz, but he might object, so I'll just say that someone from Minnesota named Norm Coleman, who lost a recent Senate election, is a putz.

user-pic

I'd like to say LOL.

user-pic

I'd like to say that Quimby is an empty suit, unfortunately, that means I'm insulting clothing everywhere.

user-pic

And don't forget Ginsberg's allegations yesterday that Franken's attys have altered and otherwise falsified the data from the Secretary of State's database. He contends that the only way to be sure of correct data is to enter into evidence the original 2 databases of approx. 5 million names each and refer to each of them in turn for each ballot in question. And even then, he contends, the database is so "corrupt" (a computer term, you know) that it would also be unreliable. In other words nothing is reliable except his knowledge that Democrats don't know how to do math based on the current federal deficit.

Meanwhile atty Hamilton is still going through a slew of absentee ballots from Duluth which were rejected by the Coleman campaign for having different dates signed by the voter and the witness, which the SC has said is not a valid reason for rejecting a ballot.

user-pic

"the Franken camp's math -- which alleges that Coleman has only offered complete and valid evidence on perhaps 20 rejected absentee ballots -- is all wrong, and the number of viable cases is really in the low thousands."

"viable cases" is not evidence. The burden on Coleman is to provide evidence, not handwaving.

But if the Court has authorized a look at those ballots, the Court should be looking at them, not leaving them to sit around as a big uncertainty. That said, I'll be very interested to see how Franken's motion to dismiss plays out.

user-pic

Franken's PR team should be attacking Ginsberg's "outsider-ness" as a DC power player is parachuted in to trash Minnesota and will leave the day the case is over. They should also highlight his arguments during the Bush/Gore mess in 2000.

user-pic

Franken's team has been playing a very clean game. Where Ginsberg impugns everyone, Franken's people stick to the facts, only going so far as to challenge the reporters to ask Ginsberg about his numbers. They did and that's what really set him off to all new levels of insult and innuendo.

user-pic

"I'd like to say that Norm Coleman is a putz"

...besides, Coleman would give putzes a bad name.

user-pic

Takisha Jones you are aware that Norm Coleman is also Jewish aren't you? I say seems time to fold his tent and prepare for his next trial in Texas. That is if he isn't going to dump that on his wife.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Elana
Schor

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address