TPMDC
« Jindal Calls Limbaugh A "Great Leader" For Conservatives, Is Glad Steele Apologized | Home | Dems Keep Up Attacks On Party Of Limbaugh »

Dem Senator Holds Up Science Nominees to Force Continuation of Cuba Embargo

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), a strong supporter of the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba, is launching a full-on battle this week to remove several provisions from the 2009 government spending bill that would open a small crack in the slammed door of relations with Havana.

Menendez fired a broadside at the Obama administration yesterday for backing a provision buried in the $410 billion spending bill, which must become law by next week in order to keep the government running. The New Jersey senator, a Cuban-American, objects to language in the bill that would allow Cuban-Americans to visit relatives on the island once a year and end limits on the sale of American food and medicines in Cuba.

Menendez even suggested yesterday that he might oppose the spending bill if the Cuba provisions were not removed, saying in a floor speech that they "[put] the omnibus appropriations package in jeopardy, in spite of all the other tremendously important funding that this bill would provide.''

Polls suggest that the majority of Cuban-Americans side with the administration, rather than Menendez -- an influential poll of the community, conducted in Florida every year since 1991, found in December that 55% of Cuban-Americans supported lifting the embargo against Havana.

But regardless of where public opinion stands, Menendez's effort is no longer confined to the spending bill. The WaPo reports today that the senator has held up two Obama science nominees in an attempt to twist the arms of his fellow Dems:

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) has placed a "hold" that blocks votes on confirming Harvard University physicist John Holdren, who is in line to lead the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Oregon State University marine biologist Jane Lubchenco, Obama's nominee to head the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. According to sources who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to discuss the matter, Menendez is using the holds as leverage to get Senate leaders' attention for a matter related to Cuba rather than questioning the nominees' credentials.

That Menendez has resorted to holds on nominees isn't surprising. Anonymously delaying nominees is an unfortunate yet time-honored tactic in the Senate, where the 2007 ethics bill imposed a six-day limit on the "holding" power but did not eliminate it outright.

But the nominees Menendez has chosen to hold are pivotal presidential allies in the push to regulate carbon emissions -- and Menendez has been admirably outspoken about the need to act on climate change. Was holding up Holdren, a longtime critic of Bush-era science policy, the best way to start a reasoned dialogue on Cuba policy?

ed. note. This post was revised to include recent quotes from Menendez relating to the coming vote on the spending bill.


46 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Brilliant tactic. NOT!! And this is the clown who's replacing Schumer as head of the DSCC? Looks like we might not get to 60 in 2010 after all.

user-pic

I hope they blow it all right past him. This is a failed set of policies, anachrnostic with with respect to every other country.

Q: Why is the "Cuba issue special?

A: No substantive reason.

user-pic

I could not agree more. If there ever was an example of a failed US policy, our Cuba stance is it.

user-pic

Here's a novel thought: Try winning your arguments on their merits, Sen. Menendez.

I swear, I hate many of the Senate Dems almost as much as I hate the Senate Republicans.

user-pic

Absolutely! I think it may be time for a primary challenge to dear Menendez, who seems to feel that climate science is the appropriate way to to address Cuba. This guy can't get over his family being dispossessed for supporting the United States fifty years ago.
Tha being said, Harry Reid is the best Republican in the Democratic caucus, he'll just let this one slide by too without applying any kind of....what's the word.....LEADERSHIP. Reid is the worst majority "leader" in the recent history of the Senate.

user-pic

Menendez is making it hard to love the democrats...there are as many shite dems as good ones.

user-pic

This is another one of those policies that I completely do not understand. Why on earth are we embargoing cuba? It only hurts the people. Engagement and stopping the embargo will help to change the regime. Isolation never has worked and never will work. It gives corrupt regimes legitimacy and an enemy to unite the people, the USA. The people perceive the USA as the problem, not their corrupt dictators. Why on earth do we keep on doing it??? I don't understand.

user-pic

It's in Twain's Huckleberry Finn. Our adventurers come upon two endlessly feuding clans, the whole being of each of them revolving around the destruction of the other. Huck's got questions:

Q1: How did the feud start, and over what issue? A: No one remembers.

Q2 Why pursue it at all in the absence of a reason?
A: It's just always been that way, and there's no point in digging around for rationales now, especially given all the hostility.

user-pic

Because idiots (no offense to IDIOTIC whom I miss dearly) like Menendez want to go back to the days of the corrupt military dictatorship of Batista as opposed to the corrupt military dictatorship of Castro. As I was told by several people last time I was in Veradero, not much changed from Batista to Castro. Nobody owned the land they worked then either. At least under Castro if you get taken away in the middle of the night there is a chance you will be let out of jail after a while whereas under Batista you ended up dead. That and the health care and education.

Menendez represents all that is bad about banana republics.

user-pic

Actually, Ludd, with the exception of King Ranch, the United Fruit Company and such, pretty much everybody who owned land before the Revolution owned the same land afterwards and the family farm remains in the family today.

Cuba never nationalized land and agriculture. The revolution appropriated only forests, plantations and ranches.

Two very bad sources of information you might want to make a note of:

1. Wait staff at Cuban tourist traps; and

2. Everything you've ever read anywhere about any Communist country. It probably doesn't apply to Cuba.

user-pic

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!!!! FOR RAUL CASTRO!!!!

user-pic

What's so crazy about this is that after 8 years of eschewing science, we need the Office of Science and Technology Policy working. Their task in the first year or so it pretty huge and holding it back just holds back our country's progression back to rational policy (and the economic benefits rational policy creates). This is really a stupid move if it drags on.

user-pic

Hey Elana! Good to have you back. I missed your thorough reporting...

user-pic


Menendez doesn't realize its 2009, not 1962.

user-pic

He's in this for the long haul, John! Only begun to feud!

user-pic
A poll last month by Florida International University found that 55% of Cuban Americans favor lifting the embargo.

Menendez couldn't be more out of touch.

user-pic

and this fool is my senator.

these people are so self-important it makes you sick to your stomach.

user-pic

Why does he behave as though he's a Representative from some Cuban enclave in FL, not the entire state of NJ?

And when is this fool up again for re-election?

Further proof of why thinking people don't contribute to the DSCC or DCCC: they funnel funds to idiots like this.

user-pic

Menendez is still living in the 20th Century.

I, for one, have pondered printing up T-Shirts that say "CUBA-51!"

What is that supposed to mean?

Cuba should become the 51st state!

I say, lets all get over the cold war, didn't Ronnie win that one? (Or was it Chernobyl?

Menendez should convert completely, do a 180, revise his whole plan, change course, and join the Cuba 51 committee.

It is time for some REAL change, maybe now that the word has been put out there for all of us to salute, lets talk about the kind of change that changes the future in bigger ways than anyone even considers.

Why not let Cuba join the Union? Open the borders, start trading with them, let Cuban Americans visit their loved-ones in Cuba and vice-versa.

Bob, think BIG, not small.

user-pic

PS Anyone who thinks I'm snarkin' about "CUBA-51!" is mistaken. I'm absolutely serious, why not let Puerto Rico, Guam and other "territories" legitimately become states?

Call it US Imperialism if you want, I think our sphere of influence can be broadened considerably without threatening some new imperial world power.

How about "associate states?" Let small countries who want to join our "Union" do so, if, say, 2/3 of their people want it?

Just food for thought, and I know lots of Cubanos, American and Cuban, consider this pure folly. But at least ponder the potential, like I said, food for thought.

user-pic

A perfect confluence, Menendez wants attention, and he needs attention. He just fails to realize that the attention he gets likely will not be what he wants.

user-pic

How much of this sort of thing do people need to see before everyone realizes that the Senate needs to get rid of its archaic, anti-democratic customs and start operating the way a legislative body in a democracy should?

user-pic

I'm sick and tired of right-wing Cubans and their stupid grudge against Castro. It's time for them to start acting like Americans or go home and fight to overturn Castro's rule. The foreign policy of the U.S. shouldn't be dictated by that crowd of violent fanatics.

user-pic

Amen!!

user-pic

Amen!!

user-pic

Is Menendez old enough to remember Batista, or did his daddy tell him the stories? Golly, remember that night all the rich old Cubans fled, the rum warehouses were emptied, and they tried to keep the music playing? Menendez is just a romantic - somebody forgot to tell Jersey!

user-pic

I can't see how this ends well for Menendez. I can only conclude that he:
1) Is a very foolish politician that can't tell which way the wind blows, both on the Cuba issue and what it means to oppose Obama while a member of the Democratic party;
2) Is a pure ideologue who is arguing for something based on True Faith, regardless of facts;
3) Gets his major fundraising from anti-Castro Cuban-Americans and is playing to his economic, rather than voting base.
Obviously, these are not mutually exclusive.

user-pic

Just curious, why Wyden's pic? I was going to get mad at my Sen for no reason.

user-pic

Ok Barack, it's time to release Rahm.
Menendez, say hello to my little friend!

user-pic

While I disagree with Sen. Menendez, you're all lacking some important context.

After the 1959 revolution, the second-largest Cuban emigre community in the U.S. formed in Union City, N.J., second in size only to Miami. I have read that Union City, because of its small size, in the 1960s actually had more Cubans per square mile than Havana. In the following decades the Cuban population dispersed throughout northern New Jersey, but the Cuban flag is still a familiar sight in Union City, and one could fairly say Castro is persona non grata in the city. While I can't say N.J. Cubans are more anti-Castro than Florida Cubans, polling data from Florida doesn't really shed much light on what motivates the Senator from N.J.

Sen. Menendez, whose parents were born in Cuba, started his political career in Union City and served as mayor there before becoming a Congressman. Menendez's base is the huge Latino population in Hudson, Bergen, Union and Passaic counties. Therefore, it is at least somewhat likely Menendez is actually responding to legitimate constituent concerns, rather than simply grandstanding on an easy issue.

Again, I think the Cuba embargo is rather a stupid policy, but Sen. Menendez comes to the issue with experience and interested consituents.

As for Menendez running the DSCC: if you can raise enough money to run for Senate in NJ, you can raise enough money to run for Senate anywhere. Also, this guy is old-school. If you're concerned about clean elections, you'd be right to oppose Bob Menendez; if you're concerned about beating the other guy, Bob's your man.

user-pic

Let him grandstand on his own time when the embargo subject comes up. What kind of fool is going to delay his own president's staffing process, especially at a time like this? I really really hate politicians.

user-pic

Yeah. The last 50 years of embargo have worked so BRILLIANTLY. Please will these neanderthals just go away.

user-pic

America wants Israel and Palestine to find peace, Sunni and Shia to find peace, North Korea to come in out of the Cold and yet they're still fighting a battle with little Cuba that doesn't trace back centuries.

user-pic

Who needs enemies with friends like these.

user-pic

I have been a contributor to the DSCC for years but disagree so strongly with Menendez on the issue of Cuba that I will not contribute as long as he heads it. I know many who feel the same way. I hope the Dems are paying attention...

user-pic

Who cares what the pampered, spoiled, catered to lunatic Cuban-Americans think or want?
They just had one of their insane tantrums and protested the King of Spain. Why? Because he criticized Hugo Chavez and failed to critcize Castro while he was at it. Therefore he must be pro-Castro. These people are crazy!
Menendez is a disgrace. He should be denied any leadership post and challenged by a quality opponent in his primary.

user-pic

Viva Fidel

Send this nitwit home = to Gitmo

user-pic


The contact for Senator Menendez.
http://www.menendez.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm

This was my message to the Senator:

Dear Senator Menendez.

I voted for you. I voted for you because I expected you to behave like a Democrat and support our new President, Obama.

I DID NOT vote for you to obstruct the work he must do for our country, chief among which is to address climate change.

I am simply ENRAGED to read that you are standing in the way of confirmation of two of his appointees who would undertake this enormously urgent task. Particularly to read that you are doing so for the ridiculous purpose of blocking a relaxation on the relations with Cuba.

Senator Menendez, get your priorities straight or I can assure you, next round of voting and your career in the Senate will be OVER.

Sincerely,

Gail Zawacki
Oldwick, NJ


user-pic

Add a "P.S.": Dear Senator Idiota: do us all un favor grandisimo: become a republicano, sa!

user-pic

Remember how we "opened up" relations with the Soviet Union, in order to start building bridges that might eventually lead to the fall of their regime?

Remember how we "opened up" relations with China, in order to start building bridges that might lead to the end of the repressive conditions that existed under Maoism?

How did that work out? Not perfectly - neither Russia nor China are model democracies - but certainly better than the alternative. We now have cordial political relations and thriving economic relations with both countries. Their people are much better off as a result, and the threat of war in the world is greatly reduced.

With Cuba, on the other hand, we maintain a bizarre fantasy that the only way to "win" is to give the island the silent treatment until the regime is forced to kowtow to our superior ways. Meanwhile, the Cuban government has had 50 years to adjust to life without the US, and they know they can feed and care for themselves as long as they wish. If we want economic and political freedom in Cuba, the logical way forward would be to pursue the same openness that worked with China and the USSR. Let our people go to Cuba, spend money there, bring newspapers and consumer goods and cultural exchanges! Do that, and the regime will start to crumble in months. Follow the Menendez path, and we'll still be having this ridiculous debate on the 100th anniversary of the revolution.

user-pic

This stuff really pisses me off. I don't live in New Jersey, so I don't know what pressure can be brought to bear on Menendez. There's got to be a soft spot that people can poke. Anybody have any ideas?

user-pic

Menandez is during this to get the word out to his Cuban constituents that he oppose the release on the Cuban embargo. He will go along in the end. It is the way the game is played. His vote may not be needed to get the bill passed.

user-pic

By the way, maybe he hasn't heard, most Cuban Americans would like the embargo lifted completely.

user-pic

You see they preferred Batista's dictatorship to Castro's because Batista "played ball" and gave American gangster's, (and the elite class), a place to party.

user-pic

For Michael A and my other fellow americans:

The embargo was enacted by President Eisenhower in response to the nationalization of American Companies ( Exxon, Shell, ATT, ITT, Sears,Ford,United Fruit Company,Chase Manhattan, National City Bank,Reader Digest,etc.)operating in Cuba, by Castro, without any compensation.

If you feel that it is OK for the goverment to take your property ( ask the Dupont Family, their estate in Varadero Beach is a restaurant today ) without due compensation, then you may dis-agree with the embargo.

However, the use of the Omnibus Bill to conduct Foreing Affairs is not good. It is deceptive.

If the president wants to chart a new policy toward Cuba, he should do it up front, without deception. He should take the bull by the horns, discuss the matter and explain the reasons. Cuba is not a subject matter for the U.S. budget. It is not for the Cubans or the Cuban exiles, and neither it is for the American people.

No wonder our country is in dis-array!

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Elana
Schor

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address