TPMDC
« Menendez: Coleman's Pitch At Throwing Out Election "A New Low" | Home | Bankruptcy Compromise Draws Clear Line Between New Dems & Blue Dogs »

EFCA, GIllibrand's Seat and the Fight over Labor

Some EFCA updates:

Looks like the Employee Free Choice Act could get introduced as early as next week. It'll easily pass the House when it comes up for a vote, just as it did last year, but passage in the Senate will be hard and it doesn't help that the Minnesota seat remains unresolved.

Tomorrow, Vice President Joe Biden is supposed to give a full-throated defense of the act when he speaks to top AFL officials at their meeting in Miami.

Meanwhile, in the hotly contested House race to replace New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, the Republican, Jim Tedisco was endorsed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce today in no small part because his opponent is supporting EFCA.


6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

A couple of weeks ago, Greg Sargent at TPL reported that MN Senator Amy Klobuchar had confirmed that the Senate has decided not to move on Employee Free Choice until Franken is seated.

Makes sense to me.

user-pic

If the Dems had any faith that Franken would be sat anytime soon, I think it's safe to say they'd wait for him with this bill.

I think it's going to have a tough time passing. I wonder if the Dems have more than a handful of GOP they can rely on.

user-pic

I'm not sure they will have ANY. The Blue Dogs will also vote against this. It will pass the House, but I give it long odds in the Senate. Business interests will pull out every stop to kill this.

user-pic

The Blue Dogs won't necessarily vote against this. As a group, fiscal conservatism is their rallying cry, and Employee Free Choice doesn't have much to do with that. The only Dem Senator I'm aware of that we need to worry about is the Colorado appointee (who never had to ask for labor money to get into the Senate …). And Specter can kiss his labor support goodbye if he doesn't give in. Plus, IIRC, Collins and Snowe both voted for cloture last time. So there really isn't that much to worry about. Meaningful health care reform is rather more worrisome right now.

user-pic

I thought they were going to make it go through the Senate first this time? You know, make Lucy kick the damn football for once?

user-pic

How about we call it the Employee Free Choice Act? Or EFCA if that's too long?

"Card Check Bill" is what the Chamber of Commerce calls it, because they don't want people to think they're against employees having freedom to choose, even though they are.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Elana
Schor

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Capital Wire

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address