TPMDC
« Pentagon Officially Lifts Ban on Media Access to War Dead | Home | Franken Camp Asks Court To Have Coleman Pay Costs -- What Next? »

GOP Senator Seeks IG Review of Treasury's Role in AIG Bonuses

Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley (IA) has asked the Treasury Department inspector general (IG) to open an inquiry into senior officials' knowledge of AIG's plans to pay out $450 million in bonuses to employees of its disgraced Financial Products unit.

In a letter to the Treasury IG today, Grassley singles out the department's general counsel as the office "largely involved" in the decision to let AIG proceed with its bonuses. Treasury chief Tim Geithner has said he became aware of the bonuses last Tuesday and notified the White House two days later, but Grassley also has asked the IG to examine that timeline.

Grassley's full letter to the IG, Eric Thorson, can be read after the jump.

Dear Inspector General Thorson: I am writing to ask you to initiate an inquiry, in whatever form you believe most appropriate, into the role, if any and actions of the Department of the Treasury (Department) in the decision by American International Group (AIG) to pay bonuses of over $160,000,000 to AIG employees. AIG is largely funded and controlled by the U.S. Government, after having incurred massive losses from ill-conceived and executed investments and transactions. Indeed, AIG received more than $170 billion in government rescue funds and I am concerned to see taxpayer money being used to pay bonuses to employees associated with these massive problems. I request that you, among other things: • determine the terms by which the Department provided funding to AIG, and particularly whether or not Treasury officials made any effort to forestall payments of bonuses or demanded waivers of bonuses prior to releasing any taxpayer funds; • determine when the legal obligations were incurred; and • whether these bonuses are compelled by contracts between AIG and its employees. In so doing, I request that you obtain and analyze such contracts and determine how the obligation to pay bonuses is established, for example by individual performance or overall corporate performance. In addition, it has been reported that the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve took every legal step possible, but unfortunately were unable to stop AIG's decision to pay out the bonuses. As it appears that the Department's Office of General Counsel and others, were largely involved in these matters, I believe it is appropriate that you obtain the information I am seeking. I appreciate your cooperation and assistance in getting the facts regarding this troubling matter. Sincerely, Charles E. Grassley of Iowa United States Senator Ranking Member of the Committee on Finance

8 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Will Grassley now have to apologize to Limbaugh now that Limbaugh today defended the bonuses.

Limbaugh is heaven sent today -- I was starting to worry that the GOP might have the advantage on the populist message, leaving the Dems portrayed as the corporatist party.

user-pic

Trying to blame Geithner is only going to come back on themselves. Congress is ultimately responsible for oversight.

user-pic

The Repubs are hyping and exploiting the AIG "outrage" because they sense an opening, and the under-reporting of this is another aspect of the permanent Repub bias in the press, a situation well remarked-on within this site. And they wonder why they're losing market share, yadda-yadda. That's by no means the whole of the AIG reaction, but a part of it.

user-pic

Considering these payment plans have been on the record for quite some time, I don't see how congress can pretend THEY didn't know.

This is pure theater.

user-pic

Anyone else notice that Washington's in an uproar over $165 million that it probably can never recover while AIG has made off with $145 billion, the banks - 700 Billion, the Auto Companies (fill in the blank)

user-pic

Why is it that senators who I used to consider mildly annoying like Grassley and Ben Nelson, are now constantly in my face seriously annoying the crap out of me? It's like Joe Biden's elevation to the vice presidency freed up so much camara time that the vacuum has sucked in people who used to keep a much lower profile.

user-pic

Grassley is at least partly motivated by the fact that he's up for re-election in 2010 and represents a state that broke Democratic in a big way in 2008. You'll be seeing a lot more of him.

user-pic

Give Grassley the mike if he's going to keep saying stupid things, he will hang himself with it.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Elana
Schor

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Capital Wire

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address