House Dem Chairmen Outdo Senators With Solidarity Pledge on Health Reform
Three House Democratic committee chairmen -- Henry Waxman (CA) at Energy & Commerce, Charles Rangel (NY) at Ways & Means, and George Miller (CA) at Education & Labor -- have just sent a letter to President Obama vowing to work together on health care reform legislation that can become law this year.
The letter is notable for its emphasis on a uniform, coordinated timetable to ensure that turf battles over committee jurisdiction do not slow down the debate over health reform. The still-unwritten climate change bill, by contrast, is already the subject of some jockeying for position by Rangel and Waxman.
Also, the House chairmen's letter contains stronger indications of a coordinated effort than a similar missive sent to Obama by the Senate's key chairmen on health care, Max Baucus (D-MT) and Ted Kennedy (D-MA).
The senators declared their "continuing commitment to enacting comprehensive health care reform this year," while their House counterparts committed specifically to "work from a harmonized approach [in their committees] to ensure success." There was some initial concern on the Hill that Baucus and Kennedy would butt heads as both committees moved forward with health care, but the Boston Globe reported this week that the two are working well together.
You can read the House chairmen's full letter after the jump.
Dear Mr. President:We are writing to thank you for organizing the White House Forum on Health Reform last week and to let you know of our intention to work closely together to pass national health reform. Comprehensive reform is essential to controlling health care costs, reviving our economy, and expanding coverage. We are committed to working with you to pass this legislation this year.
In the House, jurisdiction over health reform is shared among three primary committees. As chairs of these committees and veterans of past health reform debates, we have agreed to coordinate our efforts. Our intention is to bring similar legislation before our committees and to work from a harmonized approach to ensure success.
We have also agreed on a timetable for our joint efforts. In order to achieve our shared goal of enacting health reform this year, we will coordinate our committee consideration so that action on the House floor can occur before the August recess.
Your health care forum gave these efforts a strong start. As we proceed, we look forward to working closely with you, senior Administration officials, and our colleagues in the Senate. We will also be broadly reaching out to members of the House to build wide support for this essential effort. Your leadership and guidance are critically important to our collective success.
Sincerely,
Henry A. Waxman Charles B. Rangel George Miller
Chairman Chairman Chairman
Committee on Energy and Committee on Ways and Committee on Education and
Commerce Means Labor


















How dare they?
Don't they know that Obama is distracted??
March 11, 2009 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
...but, but, the MSM's narrative about Dem disunity over these issues? Won't someone please think of the MSM's narrative?!?!
March 11, 2009 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm.. Although I'm willing to take their words at face value for now, the stupid stuff i hear about the Dems cutting Obama's budget numbers makes me nervous about what kind of crud we will end up with.
March 11, 2009 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously, how much worse can it get? Pre-existing conditions HAVE to go, 48 million uninsured right now, think of the costs to the states on that one.......hospitals cannot keep going in this current climate, etc. Not hard to make it any worse.
March 11, 2009 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone once told me "Cheer up. Things could be worse." So I cheered up and sure enough, things got worse.
There's a lesson in there somewhere, but I'm not sure exactly where.
March 11, 2009 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
It CAN be worse. They could undermine both employer paid insurance and Medicare and leave us with insurance for profit policies that don't cover everyone, are not truly affordable, and do not truly cover legitimate medical needs.
March 11, 2009 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
No way would that fly in this atmosphere.
March 12, 2009 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
That stuff is all coming from the Senate as far as I've seen. The Senate is... different, as we (unfortunately) know.
March 11, 2009 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
HB676 - Single payer, invest in our human capital.
March 11, 2009 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is now pretty clear that most of these
politicians do not represent citizen interests.
They are beholden to the health care
Robber Barons(Cigna,Aetna,Tenet,etc).
They are in breech of their responsibility
to the citizenry and efforts should be
undertaken to recall them from officek
March 12, 2009 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
The real question, given that in the senate we seem to be stuck with right corporatist democrats representing us (e.g., Senator Max "lobbyists just want what’s best for America" Baucus) and the issue of filibuster and needing 50+one votes vs. 60 vites, is what is the least bad (since we single payer is off the table) bill we can get?
And does the House, hopefully represented by single payer (largest number of co-sponsors including at various time Rangel, Wasman and Miller) and/or Rep. Pete Stark (whose Americare is not single payer, but is public option on steroids and meets Obama's guidelines) really have any real role to play to help pull the negotiations to the left. Since Baucus is in effect negotiating with Grassley and Enzi (and AHIP) to find the weakest thing that Obama/Kennedy/Dodd will buy into.
Seemore at: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/3/9/13320/55356/419/706390
Peace & health.
March 12, 2009 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink