« GOP Strategist Roger Stone: Steele's GQ Interview "One More Nail In The Coffin" | Home | The Mystery of the Science Holds: Why'd Vitter Go Mum? »
Huckabee: Steele's Abortion Comments "A Violation Of The Most Basic Of Human Rights"
Mike Huckabee is also slamming Michael Steele's comments about abortion in the GQ interview, with this post on his leadership PAC's blog:
Comments attributed to Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele are very troubling and despite his clarification today the party stands to lose many of its members and a great deal of its support in the trenches of grassroots politics. Since 1980, our party has been steadfast and principled in believing in the dignity and worth of every human life. We have supported a Constitutional amendment to protect life and the party has taken the position that no one individual has the supreme right to own another person in totality including the right to take that life. For Chairman Steele to even infer that taking a life is totally left up to the individual is not only a reversal of Republican policy and principle, but it's a violation of the most basic of human rights--the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. His statement today helps, but doesn't explain why he would ever say what he did in the first place.
In a very worrying sign for Steele, Huckabee is clearly aware of Steele's clarification this morning that he is pro-life and supports a Human Life Amendment. But it doesn't appear to be good enough.
(Via Taegan Goddard.)
Advertisement




















What's that I hear? A cattle call for seats on the bandwagon?
March 12, 2009 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
So... Huckster... does that mean you don't support the death penalty? Or sending our young men and women to war? Hmmm?
March 12, 2009 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
And, that you support programs to protect life, such as government sponsored universal healthcare, ability to unionize to make a living wage, universal access to institutions of higher learning based on merit, not who you know, expanding food stamps and help to the poor and needy, expanding protecting the environment, etc., etc., etc.
March 12, 2009 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
The bad news is that Steele wont be replaced by Katon Dawson, but rather Saul Anuzis (according to a Kos poster).
Anuzis will unfortunately be competent and behind the scenes.
March 12, 2009 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
How do we know that? He didn't do such a bang up job in michigan as far as I know. If he does stay behind the scenes that would be an improvement for the gop. Until you have a message and game plan, you should keep your mouth shut. Just retreading the same old bull is not helpful for the gop.
March 12, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
The MI people I know say Anuzis has lost nearly every election he could and led the MI GOP pretty much straight down the tubes. He attracted attention because he was an early Republican adopter of Facebook and Twitter, so to technically backward senior Republicans, he's seen as a kind of tech wizard. Considering how well Twitter has been working out for them, I'm not worried about his being a tremendously competent leader. He may be better than Steele, but it's hard to imagine a lower bar than that.
March 12, 2009 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
This "Republican policy and principal" of abortion is why moderates are leaving the party in droves and/or voted for Obama. The Republicans I know (my in-laws) are calling bullshit on the anti-abortion broad brush stroke of Republicans.
March 12, 2009 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Huckster for RNC chair! Huck-mentum returns!
March 12, 2009 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
He could make Chuck Norris his press secretary!
March 12, 2009 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
In related news, Huckabee once released a psychotic convicted rapist out of jail to get back at Bill Clinton, whose cousin had the nerve to get raped by the guy. Then the fella Huckabee turned loose killed a girl.
March 12, 2009 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
ARRGGGHH! I don't much care what one Republican thinks about another Republican, but it drives me nuts that people who might seriously have a shot at high political office don't know the difference between "infer" and "imply." If there were an English-only requirement for President, Huckabee would have just disqualified himself.
March 12, 2009 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink