Obama Predicts 'Strong Support' From Congress For Giving Geithner New Powers
Under questioning from the AP's Jennifer Loven tonight, President Obama predicted "strong support from the American people and from Congress" for giving the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve sweeping new powers to take over and wind down insolvent financial institutions.
Obama pitched the change as necessary to avoid a regulatory vacuum in case another major financial firm implodes in the manner that AIG did.
"Understand that AIG is not a bank," Obama said. "If it were a bank and effectively collapsed, the FDIC could step in as it does with a whole host of banks ... and in a structured way, renegotiate contracts" with counter-parties and employees.
But the FDIC, which steps in to dispose of insolvent banks such as IndyMac, is a different political animal than the Treasury and Fed, both of which have fallen out of favor with Congress thanks to the bailout's rocky path.
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) suggested today that future financial regulatory powers should be shared by the Fed, the FDIC, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, marking a sea change in the Fed's influence less than a month after Dodd's House counterpart was openly pushing for the central bank to wield new power.
So it's an open question whether Congress is ready to give that "strong support" for handing Treasury chief Tim Geithner and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke the power to decide which non-bank financial institutions live or die. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD), in fact, was open about his skepticism today.




















Is Chip Reid the biggest douche in the press or what?
March 24, 2009 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chip's follow up was the same lead question, which tells me he is the worst kind of lawyer in a deposition: the ones who attend to a checklist of questions rather than listen to the answers.
March 24, 2009 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Congress doesn't give the government that power and we get another AIG, that will be VERY BAD.
I think the public would be very infavor of this actually.
Also, AIG next bonuses will be released in the Fall. There better be something in place so they can be blocked.
March 24, 2009 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know it'll need more explaining, but once the public understands it I expect strong support.
Traditional thinking would then be a rush to characterize it to the public, with Dems trying to sell it before Reps sabotage it.
However, at least while Obama has such persuasive power, I almost hope Reps get out ahead of this and sabotage it the way Hillary and McCain got out ahead and so totally sabotaged Obama's credibility during the primary and GE.
;)
I loves me some rope-a-dope.
March 25, 2009 4:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
On point: Kudos to Elana Schor for this post, and hope TPM will be covering that much further.
"Obama pitched the change as necessary to avoid a regulatory vacuum in case another major financial firm implodes in the manner that AIG did.
"Understand that AIG is not a bank," Obama said. "If it were a bank and effectively collapsed, the FDIC could step in as it does with a whole host of banks ... and in a structured way, renegotiate contracts" with counter-parties and employees."
That was the single most news worthy issue tonight, by far. That's the central premise goig forward, in mending this financial crisis and preventing future crisis.
March 25, 2009 4:51 AM | Reply | Permalink