TPMDC
« Centrist Dems Continue Slowly Deflating the President's Budget | Home | Treasury Defends Bailout Decision-Making Process, Admits it 'Gets Calls' From Congress »

Obama's Too-Busy Meme, Cont'd

This morning, Matt Lauer continued the meme by asking Council of Economic Advisers Chair Christina Romer whether the president had "bitten off more than he could chew." Romer responds here:

Most of the he's too-busy meme has been absurd. But the always-smart Bill Galston, over at The New Republic, raises a more nuanced proposition here.

Galston notes that, unlike FDR, Obama doesn't have the same clout in a more divided Congress and that FDR really did keep things focused on the economic emergency in his first months. Galston notes:

Roosevelt delayed most of the structural reforms that did not bear directly on the economic emergency. For example, he did not even propose a commission to consider social insurance until June of 1934. Social Security legislation was introduced six months later, in January 1935, and was not signed into law until August of that year, after the provisions relating to health care had been stripped out.

Roosevelt organized his first term around two principles that the Obama administration would do well to ponder. First, he kept his (and the country's) attention firmly fixed on a single task: ending the crisis of confidence and restarting economic activity. While he was more sensitive than previous presidents to the links among seemingly disparate issues, these interconnections in his view did not warrant trying to move on all fronts at once. The people and the Congress had to be brought along with an agenda and a narrative that they could understand.

Fair enough, but I think there's a response to that, too.

First, distraction is a two-way street. Congress is constantly deviating from the economic emergency to deal with other stuff. I watched a fulsome debate on the transportation of chimpanzees and other primates the other day on C-SPAN. The House was taking up a bill in the wake of that chimp attack. It's not reasonable to focus just on one branch of government.

Second, Obama is talking about a lot of things but he's not sending up a torrent of legislation. There was the stimulus bill but everyone agreed there needed to be some kind of stimulus. He's encouraged Congress to come up with a health care plan but he hasn't forced a bill on them to consider. And besides is health care really a distraction? The facts show that you can't get entitlement reform or any control over future red ink without it. Why wait?

Third, Congress is a much bigger institution than it was in 1933 or even 1977, the other example the Galston cites. Staffs are bigger, there's more capacity to deal with more issues. If we have more of a logjam these days, it's owing to the partisan redrawing of districts, the culture of lobbying and so on but not an innate inability of Congress to handle more than a few things at a time.

As I said originally, if Obama suddenly decides to immerse himself in an obscure border dispute or something truly far afield, he ought to be called out on it. But green energy, health care, education, and other things he's pursuing all seem germane to the economy. You can disagree with them individually but it's hard to chide their relevance to the crisis at hand.


50 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Gee, anyone who becomes president has to deal with a lot. What? They want he should not do his job?

user-pic

Perhaps they're still accustomed to having Forrest Gump as a president.

But seriously, what of the snotstorm unleashed at the beginning of 43's reign? Do they seriously want us to believe that Bush (Cheney) was casual about remaking federal policy in his image?

user-pic

You mean Fredo Corleone.

user-pic

I'm getting to the point where I just don't want to read about these microscandals in any context. The media henhouse will never stop squawking and clucking about whatever moronic, no-expertise-necessary faux-issue their producers have handed to them. Why give it oxygen and validate it as "the talk of Washington?"

user-pic

The real problem, and I think it is a scandal, is that rightwing republican politicians and political operatives can whisper in the ears of members of the MSM and have it come out as the issue of the day. I have never seen a parallel when Republicans are in power.

If the Matt Lauers, Chuck Todds, Mark Halperins, etc., etc. would admit that it's the administration's opponents that are making these claims, it might be OK. But to pretend that these baseless charges are "what everyone is Washington is thinking" is at best lazy journalism, and at worst a conscious attempt by establishment Washington to weaken a popular president and the priorities of a majority of the American people. It's anti-democratic, and these people need to be called to account.

user-pic

You are right Brewmn61, it is common knowledge they will do anything to bring Obama down, it is their mission. These people have an enormous case of jealousy, they just can't stand that he is so popular. They are just pathetic & I, for one, am enjoying their antics after eight long years.I am most of all amazed at what real governing looks like & am proud enough to bust.

user-pic

People will always look for something to complain about, and once a meme gets going in the media it is hard to stop. But if this is all they can dredge up to go after Obama, then he's doing a pretty good job.

And for issues like health care, it really is a question of "if not now, when?" The hard times are going to be with us for awhile and Obama waits for a more serene time, it would probably be a few years. And those are a few years too late to start dealing with these critical issues.

user-pic

I think this misses the fact that when Roosevelt came in people recognized the crisis and the Republican party allowed him to maneuver and supported his policies. The Republican party today has not only committed itself to obstruction but there is a real debate on whether it's okay to publicly say the President should fail! We're just starting to see tent cities and bread lines like those in IN. The crisis has manifested itself; but it hasn't devastated as the Depression did. That possibility existed in September when the run on the money market accounts began and the credit markets froze.

Obama has this year to get his big tickets items. In 2010 the electoral politics will prevent the unity he can cultivate now in the caucus. Similarly, he has to deal with the unity of the Republicans to oppose his measures. He also has to face the fact that whatever he decides on the banks will be unpopular and affect his agenda.

I don't think he is doing to much. I think he's hamstrung by the political gamesmanship that has led his nominees to not simply be VETTED but AUDITED by the committees. And the media has also not helped by feeding Republican critiques with no critical thinking: a study showed there was barely ANY mention about the fact that most economists thought the stimulus too small in the run up to the stimulus vote. Why? Because Republicans flooded the airwaves and their statements were not challenged.

The President's fighting a three front war and the only people he has on his side are the American people who know this will take time and can not understand why he's not being supported by Congress and the Republicans are just saying no.

user-pic

"study showed there was barely ANY mention about the fact that most economists thought the stimulus too small in the run up to the stimulus vote. Why? Because Republicans flooded the airways"

Very good comment. I wonder also if Obama could have done more to make the point. Come to think of it, though, this also would have given naysayers another avenue: Some say too big, some say too small, truth is nobody knows whether it would even work, best to let people keep their money like Bush tax cuts did, blah-blah-blah.

user-pic

If the Depression had ended in 1935 due to FDR's intensive focus on near term goals, Galston's argument would have had more force. It would also have had more force if Hitler had come to power in 1925 and invaded Poland in 1931 and FDR's intensive focus on domestic policy had had no adverse consequences. Oh, and it would also have more force if almost everything having to do with the economy wasn't several orders of magnitude less complex and interrelated in FDR's day.

The truth is is that the Beltway MSM crowd cannot accept, either emotionally or intellectually, the concept of a president who is immensely more intelligent and capable than they are. If they accept that, then it necessarily calls their entitlement to judge his performance into question. Being more intelligent and capable than he is, if the president has more balls in the air and reins in his hand than they can keep track of, ipso facto it means he's doing too much. No other possible explantion is possible.

It's not unrelated to the reason that they are so utterly baffled and bemused by integrity and civic-mindedness.

user-pic

Yeah, what you said. Wouldn't it be great if all the morning and/or evening news programs took 20 seconds to say 'this is what was done in congress today .... Happy Birthday wishes to 22 citizens and chimpazee transportation was debated. There were 22 senators and 100 representatives in attendence.' Did I say 20 seconds? Make that 10.

user-pic
Being more intelligent and capable than he is, if the president has more balls in the air and reins in his hand than they can keep track of, ipso facto it means he's doing too much. No other possible explantion is possible.

And that conclusion only reveals the true shallowness of their intellects.

It's been nonstop, hasn't it? Republicans and the media are trying, hard to find something that sticks. There just has to be, right? There just has to be something wrong, seriously wrong, with this Democratic president because consider the last Democratic president!!!! OMG!@#!!!

Highschool kids in a clique threatened by someone who's about to expose them to the wider society, and everyone will realize what insipid and shallow turds they actually are.

user-pic

A President who can walk and chew gum at the same time? Has W brought us so low that we think NO President is capable of focusing on multiple problems simultaneously? The real legacy of the Bush Years is a lazy, echo chamber media of multi-millionaire talking heads.

user-pic

Perhaps Mr Lauer believes that Obama needs is his own ranch in Crawford where he can spend as much time as possible playing rancher while neglecting our national security threats, drowning cities and economic crises.

user-pic

This is hysterical!

Oh no! Obama is busy doing what he said he was going to do!

Maybe, just maybe one of the reasons he has to work so hard is because the previous president didn't work at all and screwed everything up?

The one place that Obama is most vulnerable to criticism is in his lack of action in fixing the banking crisis. Of course the Republicans don't want to go there because their proposals are even worse that Obama's.

So this is the best they can come up with?

GREAT!

user-pic

Obama IS doing WAY TOO MUCH!!!!
I mean everytime you turn around, he's on television talking about this change or that change. He's signing bills into law, and signing executive orders and making speeches!

My God, the speeches!!!

I mean there are words and then there are "just words." During the campaign, his speeches could be categorized as "just words." Now, his words have real impact and consequence. In fact, they are not even "words," they are whole sentences and paragraphs! And, to make matters worse, they MAKE SENSE!!! What are we to do with that? Words, sentences and paragraphs that make sense.

Then there is his handling of the government. He's out there hiring people. He's making decisions on domestic policy, and decisions on foreign policy, and using BIG, BIG, BIG NUMBERS! So it's not just words, sentences and paragraphs, he's also using numbers!!!! NUMBERS!!!

He's doing things to create jobs. He's doing things to create change. He's changing healthcare. He's changing CAPITALISM AS WE KNOW IT!!!!

Now, I know the President is supposed to do things while he is in office. But isn't he supposed to wait during his first term because he has to be re-elected for his second term and wait until after the last set of mid-term elections in, say 2014, to even think about doing stuff???

What is Obama thinking? That's he's a real President and has to get stuff, a lot of stuff done in a hurry before the country goes swirling down the drain? Is that what he thinks?

We are doomed.

We are doomed to succeed.

user-pic

Yes. We. Can.

user-pic

The "Obama is doing too much" mem is the STUPIDEST one out there. I guess it is better than is Obama was doing too little.

The only thing that Obama really hasn't tackled is the plan for the banking crisis although they are stress testing banks right now and a detailed plan will emerge in the next couple of weeks.

While they are working on that plan there is the TALF which will help with lending.

Once that bank plan is being implemented the media will switch to well why hasn't the economy turned around yet. The answer is that it is going to take months if not years for the economy to turn around. The housing bubble has burst and when a bubble burst it will take a long time to right itself up.

user-pic

The Republicans have figured out that they have a pretty nice little racket going: They get into office, destroy the economy with reckless tax cuts and a devil-may-care approach to regulation, and then, when the voters finally catch on, they leave the Dems with the job of cleaning up the mess they made -- which in turn makes it practically impossible for a Democratic president to achieve any real progressive objectives, like universal health care coverage.

Obama is signaling that he ain't going to play that game. Good for him.

user-pic

I think the subtext of this meme is that he's doing too much for them to keep track of. That Obama has the stones to pick smart people and trust them to get things done is anathema to the MSM sensibilities.

The upside for Obama is that it forces the media to play catch-up continuously.

user-pic

Here's how I see and read the MSM lately:

Obama is doing too much (but we'd be the first to yell if we decided" he isn't doing enough" would sell more newspapers)

Obama is feuding/the Obama Administration is feuding/Rahm Emmanuel is feuding with (your choice):

The Clintons
Harry Reid
Nancy Pelosi
Howard Dean

Our press is as clueless as ever. We're in a terrible crisis and if it hasn't hit your town and your family yet, peeps, fasten your seatbelts.

200 architects lost their jobs in Dallas last month. There are rumors running around that major law firms are going under. Lawyers I know are being let go - not young lawyers who can get another job.

People are right next to panic here and the MSM just blithely goes on making up little sitcoms for us.

user-pic

The Republicans aren't capable of responding to more than one issue at a time. And even they must dimly realize that they would look ridiculous if they said it was unfair of the President to do so much they couldn't keep up with him. Hence, for the good of the country the President has to stop doing so much. Of course, the truly appalling aspect is the behaviour of the MSM. Somebody should get a collection of pictures from icanhascheezurger of cats begging for tummy rubs and re-label them with media names, starting with David Cregory.

user-pic

Gregory. Sorry.

user-pic

of cats begging for tummy rubs and re-label them with media names, starting with David Cregory.

The LOL catz are too damn cute to relabel with names from the MSM.

Lets photo shop the entire GOP as the clowns they are - big red noses, big white faces with big cigars stuck in the middle of them...

user-pic
I watched a fulsome debate on the transportation of chimpanzees and other primates the other day on C-SPAN.

I saw that too. Who on earth in the "leadership" ever allowed that crap to make it to the floor?

user-pic

If not now, when?

The next four years will fly by like the terms of all other administrations. Every day of "tomorrow" just facilitates the status quo and validates previous activity, which has ultimately been ... nothing.

TheraP is correct.
Yes. We. Can.

user-pic

We've just become used to morons in high places ... you know, like Bush and ALL THE FUCKING BANKERS.

user-pic

There's also a reason for this meme. The Repukes and the Corporate Media are banking (hehehe) on a collapsing economy to recover their fascist perch. If Obama and the Dems chew too much, it will all be for naught. Therefore Obama and the Dems must scale back so that the Repukes won't have to spend another 30 years destroying the nation so they can undo ALL THAT WAS GOOD for ordinary folk.

user-pic

"The Repukes and the Corporate Media are banking (hehehe) on a collapsing economy to recover their fascist perch."

There's a REAL meme worthy of re-meme-bering at every opportunity.

Back in 2000 and 2004, CRL would have been called a paranoid conspiracy theorist for linking the media to the GOP; Nowadays, because it became so transparent since then, it's just taken for granted it was always the case.

user-pic

Good critique of the Galston essay. To which I would add, that precisely because Congress is more divided than it was during Roosevelt's day (not to mention as Matt did, that it deals with a broader range of issues), it is a tactical plus to address in some fashion and in a public way, the host of problems we face

Cross-cutting cleavage (a post FDR concept). Obama creates more opportunities for coalitions of varying composition and thus improves his position with Congresss

Secondly, as I have also pointed out before, Obama, by conciously pursuing a "broad outline" approach to legislation, fosters Congressional ownership of solutions which both enhances their approval ratings with the American people and avoids the very mistake that proved a disaster to the Carter presidency (I was there...Working for a Dem Senator)

user-pic

Add.:

I still agree with Galston that if Obama cannot deal with the financial mess, in Galston's words because Either they do not know what to do, or they do not believe they can muster the political support to do what they know needs to be done, the political future is very much in doubt indeed

But not for the reasons Galston advances

user-pic


"We have been told we cannot do this by a chorus of cynics who will only grow louder and more dissonant. We’ve been asked to pause for a reality check. We’ve been warned against offering the people of this nation false hope. But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope."

-Barack Obama

That pretty much sums it up. Why would we expect that the chorus of cynics would shut the f**k up once he took office?

user-pic

I think the problem is not with Obama, it's with commentators and Republicans who do not have his intellectual bandwidth, and who are used to dealing with a president who didn't challenge intellectually in any way. Republicans are used to just repeating a few simple ideas to defend Bush; now they have to think.

user-pic

"intellectual bandwidth"

Bandwidth?

These guys are still in the Morse Code category...

user-pic

The only way to make any successful overachiever look bad is to focus on how much they tend to take on.

Obama's ALWAYS multi-tasks gracefully, and tends to dot his I's and cross his T's to a T, so "they" have no other recourse but to make that his fault.

Do I smell a Rove?

Turn their strengths into their weaknesses, at least in the public mind? Now Obama's TOO efficient?

It may not fool most of us reading this blog, but the Palinites and The Lump's Lemmings are so desperate to find fault with Obama and his leftist minions, they will take any lead they are given, even if it drives them right over the cliff.

user-pic

Is all this really just a preemptive strike against any attempts to really truly examine the criminality of the Bush administration? Because that's the thing the far right justifiably fears. So they start this meme now as a way to prep for jumping up and down and shouting, "no no you don't have time!" when any real questions of culpability come up.

user-pic

hadn't pondered that one, but it sounds spot-on.

Pre-emptive cow manure...

user-pic

Anyone else here got a suspicion that there are politically conservative super-rich "elements" (Mellon-Scaiffe?) who are willing to take a big hit on their billions just to promote their political prejudices?

Would they game the system, especially via Wall Street, just to make Obama and the Democrats look bad?

S'cuse me for paranoia, but every time the Dow dips, I get a funny feeling some of those who just lost all those big bucks are elated, because they believe it reflects on Obama, and even if it doesn't, they own enough dead-tree media to inject the idea into the ignorant public's psycho psyche.

The Merchant of Venice; what mattered more, his precious ducats or his personal pound-of-flesh revenge?

My tinfoil deerstalker is all atingle.

user-pic

It's been said above, but not enough: the meme that this is all too much to handle only makes sense when compared to the recent decider-in-chief who found it challenging to do any one thing, never mind several of them at once.

Remember the mantra "no one could have foreseen that scenario" in response to any emergency or challenge? He was speaking for himself. Now we have someone who cannot only see things coming but is doing things to address them as well as dealing with the crises he and we inherited. We have an adult as president, not a whiny 13-year-old.

Not only do must we do these things, but we actually are able to work on them! Wow, can you believe it, Republican apologists?

user-pic

Previous President: Pea Brain

Current President: Big Brain

Matt Lauer: Go Fuck Thyself.

user-pic

Amazing what one has time to do when clearing brush in Crawford isn't allowed first priority.

user-pic

It seems, unlike the American people, the MSM thinks we elected a one ball juggler

user-pic

Pardon the off-topic, but if that is a ridgeback, it is gorgeous.

user-pic

To bad we can't get an entirely new crew of TV pundits every four years along with a new Administration. The tired old gasbags are only concerned with camera time and finding fault rather than knowledge based on research and solutions. One of elements that makes Rachael Maddow effective is that she has thoroughly researched her material and she presents new points of view from new voices. Ed Schultz hosted 1600 Penn Ave yesterday and covered more completely than anyone on TV the Free Choice Bill, as well as other issues.

user-pic

What is very clear is that our media lacks the intellectual capacity to follow, herd like, more than one meme at a time.

American media: TSTBB (Too stupid to be biased)

user-pic

Republicans would love for him to focus only on the biggest and hardest issue THE ECOMONY, in hopes that he won't suceed!

user-pic

Hmmm. So, President Obama is being tracked by much of the media on his first hundred days in office (the implication being that he has only one hundred days to prove himself successful) and then we have much of this same media now asking over and over and over and over again if Obama is trying to do too much.

As they say in court, objection your honor, asked and answered. I mean really, you have these so called balanced panels on news shows and then ask the question about Obama doing too much and Obama supporters say no and Obama detractors say yes. Gee, that's not predictable or anything. It's like my teenage son asking me if I would be OK if he stayed out with his friends until 4:00 AM. Can anyone predict my answer to the question (please leave out the blue words ;)).

user-pic

Perhaps Obama is trying to stimulate the economy by forcing the MSM to hire more staff to keep up with him. I think Obama's pace appears focused and driven; he obviously knows exactly what he wants to accomplish in the first 100 days, first year, first term. He is also controlling the media very well because the MSM can't donate days/weeks to one subject. Obama looks like he is in charge and making everybody work to keep up with his agenda. Maybe it's time for some people to retire if they can't keep up (McCain).

user-pic

The fact that this is even a meme is disturbing. Like the President isn't supposed to do everything to fix this economy for the short and long term. Doing one thing at a time is not only WRONG it's not the only way to go to truly change this country for the better.

user-pic

The Bush administration used a torrent of lies to distract media and voters for at least 7 years before the majority caught on. They threw out so many lies at once (No, it's not raining outside.) that there was no way to focus on any one mendacity.

The Obama administration is doing something similar without the dishonesty. I call it "throw them another hissing cat". If they keep pushing big agenda items out at the GOP, no one issue will have any traction.

Might get some good stuff done too.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Elana
Schor

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address