TPMDC
« Inhofe: This Bill Does Nothing To Address Climate Change (Which I Don't Believe In) | Home | In Blow To Coleman, Minnesota Court To Review Only 400 Ballots For Possible Opening »

Progressive Caucus Goes Where Senate GOP Won't

As TPMDC has previously noted, Senate Republicans don't see the need to offer an alternative budget of their own this week -- even as they blast the priorities President Obama has outlined.

But the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is taking that leap, presenting an alternative budget that includes cuts to outdated weapons projects and defense procurement initiatives as well as a new 0.25% tax on all stock trades that would offset the staggering cost of the financial bailout.

The details of the progressives' budget are available after the jump -- and worth cheering, given the recent news that the CPC is struggling to get a literal foot in the door at the White House.

Dear Colleague:

As our nation faces enormous challenges from the foreclosure crisis, the financial meltdown, increased unemployment, crumbling infrastructure, lack of health care, rising poverty numbers, and underfunded schools, we must have a bold budget that rises to meet these challenges. That's why the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) will once again introduce a full budget alternative to be considered on the House floor during consideration of the budget.

The CPC budget supports President Obama's priorities and addresses our national needs by increasing spending where it's needed most, rebalancing the tax code to be more equitable, and cutting wasteful spending, especially within the Department of Defense.

CPC Budget cuts and revenue raisers highlights:

· Elimination of unneeded, unwanted, and unproven Cold War Era weapons systems ($60 billion/year);

· Elimination of waste, fraud, and abuse at DOD. ($8.7 billion/year);

· Redeployment of all U.S. troops and military contractors out of Iraq ($90 billion);

· Repeal of Bush tax breaks for the top 1% of taxpayers ($222 billion);

· Instituting "Make Wall Street Pay For Wall Street's Bailout" tax of .25% on all stock transactions ($150 billion/year);

· Closing egregious corporate tax loopholes ($100 billion/year);and

· Cap on tax deductibility of excessive executive compensation ($20 billion/year).

CPC Budget investment highlights:

· Provides $991 billion for non-military discretionary spending in FY10, $469 billion above President Obama's request, primarily to help rescue the faltering U.S. economy and those Americans hardest hit;

· Provides $479 billion as sufficient defense spending level;

· Provides a strong economic stimulus package of $300 billion that includes an extension of unemployment insurance, an increase in assistance for food stamps, transportation infrastructure, school construction, water and flood control projects;

· Provides $120 billion a year for health care for all Americans; and

· Provides $1.22 trillion to cut the poverty rate in half over the next decade.

The CPC Budget ensures that the down payment made by H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), will not be a one time investment, but rather a starting point from which the American economy makes a defined turning point that will ensure a prosperous 21st Century for all Americans. ...

Sincerely,


Lynn C. Woolsey Raúl Grijalva

Co-Chair Co-Chair


14 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I like the "make wall st pay" tax!

user-pic

How, exactly, does this make Wall St. pay? The tax gets passed along, i.e. the fees charged by your 401k will go up. If you think for one minute Wall St. brokers are going to pay this tax, I have a bridge I'd like to talk to you about.

user-pic

A 0.25% tax on stock transactions would have nil effect on mutual funds expenses and fees. Funds buy and hold stocks for long periods of time. Where it will have an effect is on speculators and day traders, and if it ends up reducing their activity, that can only be to the good.

user-pic

Did I miss the link to the full budget proposal, or is still to come?

user-pic

Learn how to type:

"is that still to come?"

user-pic

It's a good start.

user-pic

Great but could go farther - why not repeal the tax cut on the top 2% or more. Seems to me an awful lot of people below that top 1% are suffering and if you are still in the top 10% in the middle of this depression, you could do your part and sacrifice a few bucks in taxes. When I see that our state employees (average income $37K to $55K depending on who you believe) are being asked to give up a full month of income, I sure do wonder why we aren't asking those who still have big incomes to chip in too.

Let's have some class warfare!

user-pic

Raising taxes in the middle of a recession is not a great idea, generally speaking. Repealing tax cuts for the very top would be sufficient for now.

user-pic

Why? It seems to me that taxing the VERY wealthy during a recession helps the government and everybody else, and doesn't hurt them any. What we need are MORE brackets. Right now the top tax bracket is $357,700. Put in one at $1m, then another at $5m, and then an even higher one at anything over $25m. Somebody who was worth $10b before the recession may only be worth $7b now, and their income may have dropped to only $150m per year. How is is going to hurt them or the recession if we tax their top $125m at a much higher rate?
For a more analytic explanation, see http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/03/missing-1000000-tax-bracket.html

user-pic

That is awesome, they should do this every year.

Actually I wouldn't mind seeing them do this on every bill. When health care reform comes up the progressives ask to have a vote on medicare-for-all, when cap and trade comes up the progressives ask to have a vote on a straight-up carbon tax...

user-pic

God, it's great to see a real progressive budget.

user-pic

The future of the 2 party system. Republicans will disappear and the Democrats will split into moderates and progressives.

user-pic

Who will represent all the kooks?

user-pic

WOW, over 469 billion more non defense discretionary spending? Cutting poverty in half, only 120 bill for health care? CBO should take a crack at this one, I wuold like to see how the deficits look compared to O's and the GOP pamplet.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address