The Real Policy Consequence of the AIG Bonus Backlash
In the aftermath of the AIG bonus scandal, most media outlets are focusing on Congress' resistance to any more requests for bailout money from President Obama. But the nation's newfound populism is forcing another political sea change on Washington: the push to turn the Federal Reserve into the next financial super-regulator, which I wrote about on Friday, is losing steam fast.
Here's what we know so far ... Congress plans to take up a dense and politically charged reform of financial rules later this year, and among the biggest questions is which agency should become the overall "systemic risk regulator" for Wall Street and the banks.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) has said in no uncertain terms that the Federal Reserve should have the job, but Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) has long doubted whether the Fed is up to the task given its mishandling of the government's AIG bailout.
What remains unknown is whether Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and White House economic adviser Larry Summers -- the former a Fed veteran and the latter a possible Fed-chairman-in-waiting -- also agree that the Fed should become the super-regulator. Reuters reported earlier this month that Geithner would "likely" suggest expanding the Fed's powers, but the AIG bonus scandal has severely eroded support for that move in Congress.
Even Frank is cooling to the idea he once embraced, as Bloomberg noted over the weekend:
A proposal to put the Federal Reserve in charge of market oversight is losing congressional support after its main backer, Barney Frank, said criticism over American International Group Inc. "undercuts" his proposal."There's still a need for a systemic-risk regulator," Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, said yesterday. "The argument for the Fed alone has lost a lot of political support. I think that's now got to be re-looked at."
Both Dodd and his GOP counterpart on the Banking panel, Sen. Richard Shelby (AL), have spoken favorably of making the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) the new super-regulator. Indeed, the FDIC may well have the cleanest hands in a regulatory sector that looks mighty sullied after the economic crisis began last year; a congressional investigation released last week uncovered systematic judgment failures at the Fed, the SEC, the OTS, and the OCC.
Geithner is due to reveal his views on regulatory reform during testimony before the House Financial Services Committee on Thursday. If he backs away from putting the nation's central bank in the economic driver's seat, that would bolster Dodd and Shelby's position ... and suggest that the AIG mess may have been a good thing for those who opposed consolidating power at the Fed.




















Has it occurred to anyone that it doesn't make a difference where you put the responsibility if one of our two parties is fundementally committed to sabotaging the regulatory mission of the agency and remains capable of winning the presidency?
March 23, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Unfortunately, that's an argument for giving that power to the Fed, rather than the FDIC, because the Fed Chair is appointed for long terms that shield him from immediate replacement.
March 23, 2009 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure that's an argument at all, since assuming presidential elections go 50-50 over time it will shield a bad fed chair from replacement as often as a good one... after all, the current (and, because of those long terms, for a long time to come) fed chairman was appointed under Bush...
March 23, 2009 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
It never made sense to me
Who's going to regulate the regulator?
The Fed answers to no one
March 23, 2009 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? We never seem to answer that one.
March 23, 2009 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I nominate the U.S. Department of Justice, Anti-Trust Division, for the job of super regulator.
March 23, 2009 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, let's require all Wall Street bonuses be paid in toxic assets.
March 23, 2009 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let me recommend this article: Fixing the Fed by William Greider in the 2009-03-30 issue of The Nation.
It's a good history of how the Federal Reserve has lost its grip over the last 30 years. It also talks about the politics of who's gonna be the new Sooper Dooper Regulator.
March 23, 2009 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whatever happens, there needs to be one regulator, and one set of regulations. And transparency has to be in the forefront.
March 23, 2009 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink