Gates: We've Only Spoken to Obama About Don't Ask, Don't Tell One Time
Last week, Defense Secretary Robert Gates raised some eyebrows (however briefly) by saying on Fox News Sunday that the administration had no immediate plans to move forward on President Obama's promise to repeal the Don't Ask, Don't Tell. "I think the president and I feel like we've got a lot on our plates right now," Gates said. "Let's push that one down the road a little bit." Watch:
In a statement to TPMDC, Human Rights Campaign spokesman Brad Luna said, "We found the comments disappointing. We'd rather from hear him about a plan for repeal than a comment on the president's workload."
DADT is a law, signed by President Bill Clinton in 1993, and for it to be repealed permanently, Congress would have to pass legislation explicitly doing so, but its diktats could in theory be overturned (at least temporarily) by an Obama executive order. He has, of course, not signed such an order.
The question is, then, what sort of technical complications, if any, would a repeal entail? Is there any sense in which no longer discriminating against gays and lesbians would put more on the administration's table, as Gates suggested, or is the reluctance to act more a matter of political expediency.
I put that question to the Pentagon and Defense Department spokeswoman Cynthia Smith wrote back:
Don't ask, don't tell is law. It is a political decision. And if the law changes, we will comply with the law. Secretary Gates has had one brief conversation with the president about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." He and Admiral Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are discussing how to move forward on this issue and discussions are still ongoing.
That doesn't directly answer to my question, but it raises a different one: How much time and thought is the administration really putting into this. Gates says he's only discussed DADT with the president once, but on March 2 the New York Times published a story about Rep. Ellen Tauscher's attempts to overturn DADT, which contained this update from White House spokesman Tommy Vietor: "The president supports changing 'Don't Ask Don't Tell.' As part of a longstanding pledge, he has also begun consulting closely with Secretary Gates and Chairman Mullen so that this change is done in a sensible way that strengthens our armed forces and our national security."
The statement implies a greater level of coordination with Gates on DADT than Gates himself suggests. And it indicates, perhaps, that the White House no longer plans to "end" the DADT policy, but instead hopes to change it. So where does the administration actually find itself on this issue? We'll try to figure that out and get back to you.


















Young people today apparently just do not remember the magnitude of the shitstorm which led to DADT, a policy which was a far cry short of Clinton's initial goal of legalizing gays in the military. It was a political defeat which crippled the young Clinton administration profoundly. Once again, the Veruca Salt "I want it now!" characters on the left do not understand the importance of planning and strategy by the administration before advancing with initiatives in their "must have" wish list.
The administration and the military are dealing with the Bush administration multi-layered disasters, and they need to get things right, in spite of the ceaseless tantrums.
April 2, 2009 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point. I'm not happy about it, but the approach is completely in line with Obama's style. He wants to have a roll-out plan for this issue like he does everything else.
I know it's not at the top of his list, but where it IS on the list? That is not yet clear. Yes, I want health care. I want the economy fixed. I want us out of Iraq -- and, yes, Afghanistan. But I also want this appalling DADT situation fixed, be it by Congress or executive order. It's a human rights issue and it hurts our military to exclude qualified people from service. Everyone expects it to be overturned anyway, including those in the military, so just get on with it. Please.
April 2, 2009 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's what I call leadership. Kicking the sh!t down the road. Gates certainly got some practice in the under Bush.
April 2, 2009 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
AdAbsurdrum,
You raise a really great point, however, I think the political capital groups such as the Religious Right have now is greatly diminished. On a more broader sense, over 85% of the American people believe that Gay's should serve openly, and multiple Generals (to include the CJCS who had to implement the policy) are calling for it's reversal -- so what gives?
As a service-member who is also gay, I find this policy to be unusually cruel and unnecessary in this age. I'm all about waiting due to other pressing issues happening in your country, but some sort of acknowledgement from the President that he's committed to overturning this policy would go a long way towards assuaging my worries that he won't tackle this issue until he is reelected.
April 2, 2009 9:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
First, thank you for your service malicious. I grew up on Air Force bases, and you deserve the respect of a grateful nation, not discrimination.
My bet on this? Gates told Obama he's not going to help with DADT months ago (thus the brief convorsation). Obama doesn't really care, given that he can worry about the issue after he replaces Gates and a few other top generals. But deciding there's "too much on the plate" undoubtedly pissed off Rep. Ellen Tauscher and others in the House who want to see DADT repealed (not least among them House Speaker Pelosi). What could Obama possibly given them in return for their patience?
http://washingtonindependent.com/34879/tauscher-signals-leftward-shift-on-arms-control
"The appointment of Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.) to an important State Department post is being greeted by progressive experts as indicating a shift to the left on arms control, heralding a return to negotiated disarmament accords and strengthened international norms on nuclear proliferation."
--and--
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a28b9a38-1a3c-11de-9f91-0000779fd2ac,dwp_uuid=579372f8-2285-11dd-93a9-000077b07658.html
"Ellen Tauscher, the smart US congresswoman from California who is tipped to serve as Mr Obama’s arms-control chief, has spoken of a “significant commitment” to safeguard future generations from nuclear conflict. The president, Ms Tauscher said recently, “wants to work towards the elimination of nuclear weapons”."
Not a bad compromise...if it works.
April 3, 2009 5:48 AM | Reply | Permalink