TPMDC
« Why Republicans Should Back Franken | Home | Gillibrand's Ballot In NY-20 Has Been Counted -- For Now »

Inhofe, Environmental Groups, Respond To EPA Finding

In huge news for environmentalists (and, more generally, anybody who worries about the fate of human life), the EPA, with the support of the White House, has determined that greenhouse gases are dangerous to public health. This has been coming down the pipe for some time, but now that it's official, it opens the door for the EPA to begin regulating Carbon Dioxide. But before they do, the House and Senate will probably take a stab at climate change legislation, and this ruling will no doubt affect the speed and thoroughness with which they act.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) responded with typical couth. "Today's action by the EPA is the beginning of a regulatory barrage that will destroy jobs, raise energy prices for consumers, and undermine America's global competitiveness," Inhofe said. "It's worth noting that the solution to this 'glorious mess' is not for Congress to pass cap-and-trade legislation, which replaces one very bad approach with another. Congress should pass a simple, narrowly-targeted bill that stops EPA in its tracks."

We await the introduction of that legislation.

Green groups have, unsurprisingly, taken a different position. League of Conservation Voters President Gene Karpinski said, "With this endangerment finding, the EPA has taken a step towards a cleaner, safer, more prosperous future for our country. The next critical step is for Congress to pass a comprehensive clean energy bill that will create millions of jobs, improve our security and protect our planet."

And David Doniger, policy director of the Climate Center at the Natural Resources Defense Council said, "With this step, Administrator Lisa Jackson and the Obama administration have gone a long way to restore respect for both science and law. The era of defying science and the Supreme Court has ended.

Acknowledging that global warming pollution is dangerous to our health and our environment requires the EPA to follow up with standards under the Clean Air Act -- the nation's most effective environmental law -- to curb carbon pollution from our cars, power plants, and other industrial sources.

We'll let you know if and when conservatives trot the "$3,128 energy tax" or "green-jobs-kill-other-jobs" trope.


12 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic
Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) responded...

Does that mean Oklahomans aren't woried about coastal flooding?

user-pic

Beachfront property is worth its weight in gold.

user-pic

True. Could he have watched that Superman movie where Lex was trying to create inland beach front property? While others watched for entertainment, maybe he was taking detailed notes. Just substitute rising sea level with nukes and you've got a plan....

user-pic

He prefers that his state's economic stimulus money be distributed by FEMA.

user-pic

You know what will destroy America's global competitiveness? Underfunding education! And Oklahoma should know, they are the 49th poorest state as judged by median income.

user-pic

It's just like Inhofe to make claims about jobs and competitiveness without a shred of evidence.

user-pic

"undermine America's global competitiveness"? Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but our failure not to act is undermining our competitiveness.

user-pic

But the difference is, Republicans and their sponsors can't get rich undermining our competitiveness this way. They'd much prefer shutting plants down and moving them to China.

user-pic

Apparently, America cannot compete without poisoning its citizens. Looking at Inhofe and his lobster-y complexion, I'd say he grew up downwind of a refinery, which also stunted his brain.

user-pic

Inhofe represents the thinking of a Cro-Magmun of a political person. his approach as a caretaker of our world will take us to the caveman days!

user-pic

Inhofe is not stupid, or crazy. He is evil. He is a deliberate, calculating, vicious liar. Inhofe is paid by the fossil fuel corporations to lie to the American people. Inhofe lies -- for money. It's as simple as that.

user-pic

"the EPA, with the support of the White House, has determined that greenhouse gases are dangerous to public health"

Inhofe is a wacko but that's just crazy. It stretches the meaning of "public health" beyond belief. However... if this move is designed to pressure Republicans, it's a nice piece of political maneuvering towards passage of upcoming "climate change legislation".


From the EPA:

On April 2, 2007, in Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007), the Supreme Court found that greenhouse gases are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act. The Court held that the Administrator must determine whether or not emissions of greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, or whether the science is too uncertain to make a reasoned decision. In making these decisions, the Administrator is required to follow the language of section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. The Supreme Court decision resulted from a petition for rulemaking under section 202(a) filed by more than a dozen environmental, renewable energy, and other organizations.
http://epa.gov/climatechange/endangerment.html

I'd like to see the argument used re "public health" of CO2, H2O, and methane. And does the Clean Air Act (what was at issue in that decision) really have authority re climate change effects?

From that same EPA "Action" section, it seems that only motor vehicles are fingered as "cause or contribute" factors. But cars are only about 20% of CO2 emissions. This seems odd.


Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio


Latest Videos




Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address