TPMDC Morning Roundup
Obama And Brown Point To Unity In Economic Crisis
During their joint press conference earlier today, President Obama and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown assured the public that the world would not fall into the trap of protectionism that exacerbated the Great Depression: "That is a mistake that we cannot afford to repeat." Brown also pointed to the G-20 summit itself as a sign of consensus among world leaders: "As President Obama has said, never before has the world come together in this way to deal with an economic crisis."
Obama In London For G-20
President Obama is in London for the G-20 summit. At 3:05 a.m. ET he met with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, and the two held a press conference at 5:15 a.m. ET. At 6:45 a.m. ET he met with Russian leaders. At 8 a.m. ET he met with British Conservative Party Leader David Cameron. At 9 a.m. ET he is meeting with Chinese leaders, and at 12:35 p.m. ET he will meet with the Queen of England. At 1 p.m. ET he will attend a reception for G-20 leaders, and at 3:30 p.m. ET they will hold a working dinner.
Biden Promoting Stimulus In North Carolina
Vice President Biden is in North Carolina today with Agriculture Sec. Tom Vilsack, to highlight how the stimulus program is helping rural America. First up is an 11:40 a.m. ET event at the Goshen Medical Center in Faison, and then a 1:30 p.m. ET event at a Rural Fire Department station in Pikeville.
Broad U.S.-Russia Agreement In The Works
President Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev are expected to announce talks aimed towards an agreement to reduce the number of nuclear weapons. "There is no guarantee on the outcome," Hillary Clinton told reporters, "but everything is on the table that we think is important to our relationship. They agree."
Holbrooke Briefly Meets Up With Iranian Diplomat
The New York Times reports that special envoy Richard Holbrooke had an unscheduled run-in at the Hague with the deputy foreign minister of Iran -- the first face-to-face encounter between the Iranian government and the Obama Administration. "It was cordial, unplanned and they agreed to stay in touch," Hillary Clinton told reporters. "I myself did not have any direct contact with the Iranian delegation."
Senate GOP Could Filibuster Obama Legal Nominees
Senate Republican are reportedly considering whether to filibuster two legal nominees by President Obama, one for a seat on a federal appeals court and the other for the Office of Legal Counsel. Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) complains that OLC nominee Dawn Johnsen, who has written scathing critiques of the legal opinions issued by the Bush Administration, lacks the "requisite seriousness" for the role.
Palin Replaced With Gingrich For NRSC/NRCC Dinner
CNN reports that the NRCC and NRSC have lined up Newt Gingrich to headline their fundraising dinner in June, replacing Sarah Palin. For her part, Palin's office continues to deny that she had ever agreed to do the dinner in the first place, while the committees still say that Palin's PAC had confirmed her attendance.




















Its hard to believe but Palin keeps looking worse. Please please please Palin/Bachman in 2012, better yet in 2016 as that would assure a Democratic successor to President Obama.
April 1, 2009 9:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's a scary thought...
Cheney/Palin 2012
April 1, 2009 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
haha. bring it on
April 1, 2009 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin/Bachman? I thought y'all were rooting for Jindal...what happened?
April 1, 2009 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
You've got so many unelectable numbskulls that we've got lots of good choices!
April 1, 2009 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Republican party just has too many bright and rising young stars for us to choose from. I personally was in favor of Steele/Bachman for 2016.
April 1, 2009 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd like to see Palin vs. Jindal in the primaries, with the eventual ticket either Palin-Bachmann or Jindal-Tancredo.
April 1, 2009 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I vote for palin/bachmann. You get a twofer. That's a republican ticket for the ages. Palin/bachmann in 2012! You betcha!
April 1, 2009 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
YOU happened, SFC! My vote:
SFCWallace / Palin 2012
April 1, 2009 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once upon a time some Dems wished that Ronald Reagan were the nominee since he was obviously so extreme and incompetent.
Be careful what you ask for.
April 1, 2009 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
We won't underestimate them, we will campaign hard, that being said what a hilarious ticket that would be.
April 1, 2009 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin/Joe "The Idiot" the Plumber '13
PS: I [heart] Michael Steele!
April 1, 2009 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, the Repubs know Dawn strikes fear into their hearts
April 1, 2009 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dawn Johnsen lacks seriousness for the role? Dawn Johnsen who graduated summa cum laude from Yale and served as an editor for the Yale Law Journal? Dawn Johnsen who worked from 1993 to 1998 in the Office of Legal Counsel, spending those last two years as Acting Assistant Attorney General heading the OLC? She lacks the requisite seriousness to be the full Assistant Attorney General heading the OLC?
Who else exactly does Cornyn have in mind? Alberto Gonzalez?
April 1, 2009 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know. It beggars the imagination. Johnsen has thought, spoken and written more, and more trenchantly, about the role of OLC than perhaps any living person. She is one of the best-qualified subcabinet nominations not only of this Administration, but of any in my memory (which extends back to the 1970s).
That an empty suit like Cornyn would threaten her nomination, especially on this basis, is just through-the-looking-glass weird.
April 1, 2009 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Onfilibustering an OLC nominee for being outspoken against the Yoo era, the GOP has no clue. The OLC was out of control and just about every sensible person knows it. John Yoo is basically a pariah among the elites of legal scholarship these days - he lost his gig at Berkeley as his links to torture came out and he's know at an obscure conservative school in Orange County. No one but diehard true believers in "unitary executive" theory support his views, which is basically him, Dick Cheney and a handful of others. The "unitary executive" theory, by the way, should terrify any member of Congress regardless of party affiliation. It essentially views the President as a dictator, especially during times of national crisis.
There's no way in hades, by the way, that Hamilton gets filibustered. Dick Lugar supports him, which makes it 59 for, plus out of respect for Lugar at least a few other GOP senators won't want to filibuster. Much more likely that some coward puts it on anonymous hold for no good reason.
April 1, 2009 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sen. Cornyn doesn’t have the "requisite seriousness" to be a human. Boy I seem to remember the republicans threatening the senate with the nuclear option if the Dems didn’t go along blindly with Alito and Roberts. Can anyone say hypocritical cretin piece of shit
April 1, 2009 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can anyone say hypocritical cretin piece of shit?
Yes, I can: Joe Lieberman.
April 1, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
The President's nominees deserve an up-or-down vote! Oh, sorry, that talking point is no longer operative...
April 1, 2009 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Firstly, it is gratifying to see the fishwrap of record actually use the F word with relation to Republican obstruction.
Secondly, Senator Cornpone back in 2003 wrote:
Naturally, IOKIYAR
April 1, 2009 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hypocrisy, thy name is Cornyn.
April 1, 2009 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's time for the Democrats to use a nuclear option of their own. Abolish the filibuster. Or make the it so difficult that the filibuster will only be used in exceptional circumstances. As has been pointed out on TPM, the rules governing the filibuster have been changed several times over the years.
Possibly change the rules so that 60% of the senators present -- rather than 60% of the Senators serving -- can impose cloture. The Republicans would have to spend hours and hours in and around the chamber, which would force them to stop using quite so habitually.
April 1, 2009 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
My suspicion is that the Rethuglican oppo guys found something big in Palin's background. First McCain backs away and now the NRCC dumps her as a speaker. I think they learned something they think we don't (already) know.
April 1, 2009 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Palin's background"
I would guess it's more likely something in the foreground, like her reputed affair with her husband's business partner. There's never been a lack of evidence of hypocrisy in Palin's daily ministrations, maybe someone in the Wingnut wing of the republican party actually clear-lighted and said "this dame's trouble."
The only thing worse than a militant religious evangelist in office is a phony one.
Ponder THAT!
April 1, 2009 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
"this dame's trouble."
You mean they finally softened enough to realize that "this dame's hot" isn't sufficient reason to promote her as a candidate?
You may be ascribing too much non-erectile thinking to them...
April 1, 2009 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Question: Are there any militant evangelists in office that aren't phoney?
I'm racking my brain and I can't come up with one. They are all flaming hypocrits using outrageous rhetoric to rally the uninformed and racist elements to support them. I don't believe that they belive half of what they say. Any ideas for a militant evangelist that isn't phoney?
April 1, 2009 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I personally am hoping for that Fred Thompson, Sarah Palin ticket. I always loved the Ghost and Mrs. Muir!
April 1, 2009 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
RE: Cornyn being a hypocrite.
If he supports a filibuster, throw this article at him.
27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 181
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy
Fall, 2003
Article
*181 OUR BROKEN JUDICIAL CONFIRMATION PROCESS AND THE NEED FOR FILIBUSTER REFORM
John Cornyn[FNa1]
A sample.
"*188 That is why the filibusters of judicial nominations have never been a part of Senate tradition before, and why its current usage is such an abomination: Simply put, filibusters are the most virulent form of unnecessary delay one can imagine in the Senate's exercise of the judicial confirmation power."
April 1, 2009 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink