Obama Appointee Given Second Hearing After Republicans Boycott First
Judge David Hamilton will testify once again before the Senate Judiciary Committee at the behest of the committee's Republicans, most of whom refused to attend his first hearing.
Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) isn't happy. "It has been four weeks since Judge Hamilton first appeared before the Committee, and I am disappointed that Committee Republicans have yet to ask a single question of this nominee," Leahy said.
Nonetheless, at the request of the Ranking Member, I have invited Judge Hamilton to testify on April 29. Judge Hamilton has the strong support of his home state senators, Senator Lugar and Senator Bayh. After Judge Hamilton appears again before the Committee, I hope Republican members will not further delay our consideration of this qualified judicial nominee.
President Obama tapped Hamilton on March 17 to fill a vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, and two weeks later, most members of the committee minority refused to attend the first hearing to consider his nomination.
Among Republican objections to the Indiana jurist is his liberal position on women's reproductive rights. His supporters note that he's eminently qualified for the position, and advocates, including at NARAL Pro-Choice America, are pushing hard for his quick confirmation.
Late update: Yesterday Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) threatened to filibuster Hamilton once his nomination clears the Judiciary Committee. This is the same Inhofe who once said filibustering judicial nominees is unconstitutional. Presumably he's planning to place a hold on Hamilton, but if the GOP files cloture on his confirmation Democrats will need more than just Lugar on thie side.




















More games.
April 21, 2009 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Inhofe promises to filibuster Hamilton - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-millhiser/inhofe-obamas-judicial-no_b_189534.html
April 21, 2009 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hecklers.
The Republicans are nothing but hecklers. They have nothing constructive to offer.
April 21, 2009 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if you read the quote:
It becomes very clear that Imhofe does not think filibustering judges is unconstitutional. He thinks that democrats filibustering judges is unconstitutional.
See, it's all clear once you know what he said. And given some of Imhofe's previous idiocies, it's not that much of a stretch.
April 21, 2009 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nothing new there. IOKIYAR, for all values of "I".
April 21, 2009 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I propose that we rename the U.S. Senate the George W. Bush Junior High School.
Or is that giving them too much credit?
April 21, 2009 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps the George W. Bush Junior High School for Special Needs Children?
April 21, 2009 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where did your blog post go?
"I Am A Monster" seems AWOL.
April 21, 2009 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting that my comment on your missing post is also absent from my own Comments list.
April 21, 2009 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, sorry. The system only allows for all or nothing.
April 23, 2009 8:20 AM | Reply | Permalink