TPMDC
« Murphy Leads By 168 Votes, As Absentees Come In Strong | Home | TPM Exclusive Interview With Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) »

Rep. Joe Sestak, Retired Rear Admiral, Seeks To Take Lead On DADT Repeal

Last night, I interviewed Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA), who's positioning himself to be a leader on military issues in the House of Representatives. Sestak is a retired Navy rear admiral, and the highest ranking officer ever to serve in Congress. We spoke broadly about military issues--particularly about the Obama administration's proposed Pentagon overhaul--but we also touched on the coming Don't Ask, Don't Tell fight.

I asked Sestak for his position on the issue, and his take on how the administration--which seems very much to have put a repeal on the back burner--has handled it. Here's what he said:

I think he's right to wait until maybe this Fall or in the first year....

I went to war with people that, you know, statistics showed from outside groups, that we had a certain percentage that were gay. And you know how can you come home and say "you went to war for my country with me, but you don't deserve equal rights."

And so I've asked to cosponsor the bill--to be one of the original sponsors of the bill, along with Eric Massa [D-NY] and Patrick Murphy [D-PA]. I don't know what Ellen Tauscher [D-CA] is going to decide whether just one of the three gets it. I'd like it to be three warriors to show the import of putting this behind us and making it past and open. However, I do understand that there's only so much on the plate that President Obama can address at one time. I'm supportive, and I think the community will supportive. Let's address it maybe later this year. But I'm ready to vote for it the moment it comes up. To me this is a non-issue.

Last week, Roll Call reported that Murphy would take the lead on a DADT repeal when Tauscher moves over to the State Department. We wrote at the time that there'd be significant symbolic significance to such a move--Murphy, after all, is a Bronze Star winner, the first Iraq war veteran to serve in Congress, and a member, along with Sestak of the House Armed Services Committee.

Massa, meanwhile, retired as a naval officer when he was diagnosed with Non-Hodgkins lymphoma, but during his career served as an aide to NATO Supreme Allied Commander, General Wesley Clark.

It's still unclear whose name will top the bill, or if all three will front the effort, but the fact that three high-profile, former military Democrats will be pushing for a repeal will no doubt carry great weight.

We'll bring you much more from our wide-ranging interview later today.


18 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Has Joe expressed any interest in running for the PA Senate seat in 2010? He is at the right age (57) and has won in the heavily Republican Philly suburbs - in 2008 he won by about a 20% margin.

He also raised about $3.6 million in the last election cycle, but only spent $880,000 so he probably has a nice war chest to get started with.

Chris Cilliza reported today that "Word in the Keystone State is that Rep. Joe Sestak (D) has put on a major fundraising push in the quarter as he re-thinks the possibility of a Senate run. (Sestak started the year in a strong cash position with nearly $3 million in the bank.)'

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/cheat-sheet/white-house-cheat-sheet-16.html

Can TPM get his office to comment on this one?

user-pic

That's why I'm thinking he's pushing this. He's going to run for Senate. He's trying to appeal to progressives.

user-pic

He's in favor of gay people serving in the military and he's a rear admiral. Heh.

user-pic

I was all pissed off that DADT is still policy and then your joke made me laugh. Thanks.

user-pic

I second that emotion.

user-pic

The most significant romantic relationship of my life ended when my ex joined the Navy because she had to move across the country and then to Hawaii. Now she's a translator for the armed forces. She's bisexual and lives in fear that a bigot will find out and try to get her fired. She tells me that she knows plenty of other gay and bisexual men and women that work as military translators. The fact that these people, who are arguably the most educated enlisted members of the armed forces (which is to say that they get the most education from the military, they have the highest pay grade before danger pay of any enlisted job), can be fired for sexual orientation is an absurd tragedy. We're trying to win two wars and fight global terrorism, folks; play time this isn't.

user-pic

I have heard that female career members of the military are under enormous pressure from some men..."give in, or I'll tell everyone you're a lesbian". Is this true? Is there any recourse from this kind of blackmail?

user-pic

She hasn't mentioned anything like that and I'm sure she would have if it were going on. We haven't been talking as much as we used to, however, for the past, uhmm, 9 months? Last we spoke she wasn't "out" to more than a few people she worked with so the danger of someone trying to blackmail her over it is low. She graduated 2nd in her class (for her particular language, Korean) behind only a native speaker at the Defense Language Institute. That might give her a better chance at having her word favored against someone else's since she's one of their best. I'm not sure. I would imagine that a woman in a weaker position or "out" to more people would be more vulnerable to those claims.

Maybe I should call her...

user-pic

Thanks for this -- I've read about the military drumming out Arabic language translators because they were gay. Talking about shooting yourself in the foot!

user-pic

That's why I'm thinking he's pushing this. He's going to run for Senate. He's trying to appeal to progressives.

Maybe so, but it's still a pretty gutsy thing to do. I live in Sestak's district and it's culturally conservative -- at least by Philly suburban standards. Much more blue collar Catholic than Main Line WASP liberal.

And even though he's a two-term incumbant, Sestak is far from entrenched. The local Republican machine is still strong. He's taking a real risk.

user-pic

So lets make this is an occasion to donate to his campaign. A person willing to take the risk to do the right thing deserves support. I'm going to check out his website now.

user-pic

concerning the comments here about risk.

did it ever cross your minds that the man has INTEGRITY?

so,to me he takes no risk.

and i predict he will run and win the senate seat.

he seems to me to be able to appeal to all decent people.

user-pic

he seems to me to be able to appeal to all decent people.

Yeah, but he needs to win a majority (hat tip to Adelie Stephenson).

user-pic

I notice the military men wait until they are retired to speak out. I'm sorry this is the way it is....but if they do speak out, their career is effectively over. I'd like to see this change.

user-pic

Actually, they some do speak out while still active service -- but only if they're right wingers or religious nuts.

user-pic

Whether or not he will run for the Senate, Joe has some courage above and beyond. The tighty whitey wingnuts will be all over him like flies on excrement.

I hope he runs against Arlen or Mr. Supercon and whips their ass.

user-pic

Thanks, Joe. And thanks to Wes Clark for his strong fundraising support of Sestak in '06.

user-pic

Slightly off thread but re tolerance in the military, isn't it about time the Obama Admin goes after the religious discrimination at the Air Force Academy?

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio


Latest Videos




Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address