Retired Admiral And Current House Dem Pushes Back On 'Cuts' Meme
You probably haven't seen too many mainstream media reports of politicians arguing convincingly in favor of Gates' defense overhaul, but Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) did just that on Morning Joe earlier today. Watch:
The capsule version is this: Sestak first corrected Joe Scarborough's assertion that the Gates plan amounts to spending cuts, and then went on to defend the overhaul on the merits (why we don't need to buy an extra handful of multi-billion dollar ships, but should modernize the existing fleet, etc.) and to accurately characterize the looming, sure-to-be bruising battle in Congress.
This is important coming from Sestak, for a few reasons. He's a member of the House Armed Services Committee. He's a young legislator, but very well regarded by his peers. He's a retired Admiral (the highest-ranking officer ever elected to Congress), so he knows a thing or two about what the military does and doesn't need. And though his state and his district stand to lose lucrative contracts under the Gates plan he's nonethelessrather enthusiastic about it.
Sestak serves in the Pennsylvania delegation alongside powerful Rep. Jack Murtha (D-PA), a former marine, who chairs the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, and who released a lukewarm statement about the budget proposal earlier this week--so we'll keep an eye on his role in the proceedings.




















Put Sestak on all of the Sunday talkies this week, and make him one of the pointmen on this issue.
April 9, 2009 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Co-sign.
April 9, 2009 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Third
April 9, 2009 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I saw him this morning. He did a great job! He should definitely be a regular surrogate. Very effective.
April 9, 2009 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can't Republicans focus on real points? I mean, there are are a lot of real problems that they could focus on (like, um, deficits or something?). Instead they make up imaginary problems like this 'spending cut'. Jeez, it's as if Bachman was in charge over there!
April 9, 2009 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can't Republicans focus on real points?
Sure they can. . .and your magic pony is going to arrive Saturday!
April 9, 2009 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cool! I had a long bike ride yesterday and am now suffering the consequences--a magic pony would be great!
April 9, 2009 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
The F-22 is the most technologically advanced fighter ever designed, but it is already obsolete. The air wars of the future are going to be fought with high performance drones. Their "pilots" are going to be sitting on the ground hundreds of miles away.
Anyway there really isn't a air force out there that can compete with our existing F-15s. None are on the drawing board. If there is a weapon we can safely cut, the F-22 is that weapon.
April 9, 2009 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
A high-performance drone battle? Why does that seem so boring?
April 9, 2009 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
See "Star Wars -- Attack of the Clones." ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
April 9, 2009 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I voted for Sestak back when I lived in Pennsylvania. You're welcome.
April 9, 2009 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sestak commanded a carrier battle group when he was a Navy admiral, he can go on shows like Morning Joe and wipe the floor with the vacuous Scarboroughs, Buchanans and Barnicles of the world.
Zbignew Brzezinski to Scarborough on Morning Joe;
"You Have Such a Stunningly Superficial Knowledge of What Went On That It's Almost Embarrassing to Listen to You"
April 9, 2009 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sestak is my rep; I volunteered for his two campaigns. We see here yet another difference between the GOP and Democrats: he was serious, factual, issue-based. Contrast to Cole and Inhofe and the rest of those jackasses on the other side. And there are big-time defense contractors here, yet he's willing to see the big national picture.
April 9, 2009 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Weefer,
I'm north of you in Bucks County, Patrick Murphy is my Congressman, he took the seat long held by the Repugs.
April 9, 2009 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the Obama Administration is setting a trap here. Usually when he doesn't come out quickly, he'll letting the GOP dig themselves in and go on record so that then can't run from their statements.
I don't think most folks realize how much the US spends on it's Defense budget, especially compared to the rest of the world. The GOP and the MSM outrage machine is going to do the leg work on this for him.
April 9, 2009 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Walter,
and its because we spend so much that we're constantly getting in trouble around the world.
Madaleine Albright to Colin Powell; 'what's the use of having this superb military if we aren't going to use it.'
April 9, 2009 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pleae folks..realize that the Pentagon budget is record breaking and totally unnecessary-- more under the fold.
Obama's war budget: Another 540+Billion for the Pentagon and 140 billion extra for Afghanistan and Iraq. Count all the other goodies like homeland security, veteran's benefits, CIA,etc. and you come up with a 1 trillion budget for the military. This out of a nearly 4 trillion budget.
We already spend more than the rest of the world combined on the military. We have 30,000 nuclear bombs and nearly 1,000 military bases all over the world. Who is our enemy and what is their force projection? Do we need 12 aircraft carrier squadrons to fight suicide bombers and IED’s? We have a nuclear submarine fleet armed with nukes with enough firepower to destroy the world. And they are impervious to a first strike attack! These subs alone can keep peace in the world, or, alternatively, insure that the USA rules the world. (which is more like it.)
Cut the military budget to half its size and we would still dominate the world. The 130 billion to Afghanistan and Iraq is money down the drain. Our insane mission impossible to right wrongs in the middle east and grab the oil while we’re doing it, proved impossible.
Pentagon money down the drain! Better spend the money here for stuff we can grow an economy on. And please no more bubble economies, no more globalized information age economies where our best and brightest bankers take in junk mortgages, slice, dice and collaterise them with a few clicks of the computer, then these elite schooled ,information-age, greedy, globalized bankers had the rating companies rate this junk as AAA securities , which were then leveraged 30x and sold all over the world as GOLD! (Causing Iceland and others to collapse!)This is a crime scene, not an economy! Can we go back to making things ?
Obama's “State of the Union’ speech the other week made a pitch for a new “American century.” (i.e. we must rule the world)! This does not bode well.
What? the American Century Part II? Yes, Obama said it the other day, ("The only way this century will be another American century is if we confront at last the price of our dependence on oil and the high cost of healthcare; the schools that aren't preparing our children and the mountain of debt they stand to inherit.")
Here he was following up on Henry Luce's claim that the 20th century was America’s time to be the world’s good Samaritan and spreader of democracy and hegemon. Add to that, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright's notion of America as “the indispensable nation.” Then go back in time to the Puritan idea that we are chosen people that will bring light unto the world and that we are a city upon a hill for all to see, a beacon of goodness. And don’t forget the neo-con Project for the New American Century which promoted American global leadership. Fundamental to the PNAC were the view that "American leadership is both good for America and good for the world" and support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity.
Can this be? Is numero uno in our future?
No doubt, we were a can-do country during the 20th century –climbing out of the depression, winning the war, helping our friends with the Marshall Plan and surpassing Great Britain as the major economic and military powerhouse. But we suffered during the Bush years, with the Iraq war debacle, Guantanamo, the Katrina Debacle, the Wall Street melt-down.
Are there still customers for Brand America? Probably not and God seems to be looking at us with a jaundiced eye, and so maybe now’s the time to became a caring, peaceful country like Sweden, or Norway. Mixed economies with great social services. And perhaps a new UN , minus the likes of John Bolton, can become the new city upon the hill.
April 9, 2009 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I may have missed it, but TPM needs to credit RICK SANCHEZ CNN who earlier today showed Inhofe's YouTube from Afghanistan "Obama's gutting the military" and flat out called him a liar
April 9, 2009 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I completely missed the Sanchez interview, but you're absolutely right.
watch?v=NVQSiDSiCbg
April 9, 2009 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink