Sebelius' Filibustered Nomination To Move Forward--Why Not Johnsens?
We haven't been following Kathleen's Sebelius' confirmation fight as closely as we have those of some other Obama nominees because, initially, she seemed like a shoe-in. The Senate Finance Committee advanced her nomination to head the Department of Health and Human Services by a wide margin just last week. But in the wake of some complaints from anti-abortion groups--including about her April 23 decision to veto the latest in a series of efforts by the Kansas legislature to limit late term abortions--she'll now be subjected to a cloture vote (or, if you don't speak Congress-ese, a filibuster).
Her initially-non-controversial nomination will likely come to a vote tomorrow, though, and she'll likely clear the 60 vote hurdle with the help of Maine Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, and possibly others.
But, of course, there's another female Obama nominee who's running into some trouble.
In fact, Dawn Johnsen's nomination to head the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel seems to be, if anything, in more trouble than does Sebelius'. There have been rumors of a Johnsen filibuster for weeks now, and outside groups, both pro-confirmation and anti, have been lobbying Congress as the process has all-but-ground to a halt. (Just today, the groups People For the American Way, Alliance for Justice, National Women's Law Center, and NARAL Pro-Choice America hosted a conference call for reporters during which former OLC-chiefs Walter Dellinger (who served under Clinton) and Douglas Kmiec (who served under Reagan and George H.W. Bush), along with Johnsen's Indiana University colleague Aviva Orenstein, made the case for a quick confirmation.)
Now, keep in mind that Sebelius will be a cabinet-level official while Johnsen will not, and in that sense it's plausible that Democrats have prioritized a vote on Sebelius' nomination in order to make Obama's cabinet whole. But it's also plausible that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (R-NV) isn't as sure he can clear the cloture hurdle if the question on the floor is on the confirmation of Dawn Johnsen. More on the apparent disparity as I learn it.




















Because of the Swine Flu. The GOP doesn't want it publicized that a senator is filibustering the HHS.
I mean it's bad enough that the GOP Senators stripped Pandemic Flu outbreak money from the Stimulus.
April 27, 2009 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Word on the repub street is that the flu scare has been drummed up just to get Sebelius confirmed.
April 27, 2009 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, no, it's much worse than that. The Democrat Socialists actually created the swine flu virus (excuse me, the Obama swine flu virus) just to get Sebelius confirmed.
Those Demoncrats will stop at nothing. Trust me.
April 28, 2009 2:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for getting to the bottom of this one, for us, gharlane.
April 28, 2009 6:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Someone's gotta do it ;)
April 28, 2009 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
:)
May 1, 2009 8:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
The outbreak did occur in Mexico City right around the time Obama was visiting. Coincidence? I think not!
April 28, 2009 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hah! See? QED. Democrat Socialist Hussein Obama probably hatched this one with all those brown people while he was palling around with Chavez and Castro.
Has anyone tipped Michelle Bachmann off yet?
April 28, 2009 10:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't know how I missed this one. As reported on The Daily Show, the actual reason for the Obama Swine Flu Epidemic is so that he could impose martial law and eliminate private health insurance.
Will those Democrat Socialists stop at nothing?
April 29, 2009 1:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
It certainly will be illuminating if Republicans block Johnsen. They can holler all they want about her work with abortion groups, but if Sebelius is confirmed, that suggests that the real worry about Johnsen isn't abortion at all, but her outspoken position on torture.
Republicans. All for the sanctity of life, unless they have to protect their own from some legal hot water.
April 27, 2009 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or ...
Republicans. All for the sanctity of life, unless it's someone in a prison on Death Row.
Or ...
Republicans. All for the sanctity of life, unless it's an Iraqi.
I am still buzzing with amazement at Lawrence O'Donnell's takedown of Pat Buchanan on these two issues on MSNBC recently (thanks to fellow TPM'er Joshua for this collection):
http://thejoshuablogs.blogspot.com/2009/04/msnbc-give-lawrence-odonnell-10pm-slot.html
April 27, 2009 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
The way I always heard this one described was "Human rights begin at conception and end at childbirth"
April 27, 2009 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brian, I realize that Senator Reid is not held in high regard by a lot of us, but bitch slapping him by calling him a republican is taking it too far.
April 27, 2009 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hah! Good catch. I didn't even notice.
April 27, 2009 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
How come Republican nominees can have histories with all sorts of right wing groups, but NARAL is fatal? Wait...I know...say it with me...
IOKIYAR
April 27, 2009 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think a filibuster of Sebelius was ever a risk at all. Roberts and Brownback (especially Brownback) would have had a lot to lose at home if they got in the way of the nomination of the very popular governor of their home state. So in addition to the few pro-choice GOP senators, i think those two were not a filibuster risk (an opinion compounded by Brownback's open support of Sebelius's nomination and his state-house goals)
April 27, 2009 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
One possibility is that they're prioritizing Sebelius over Johnsen for the same reason they prioritized Chu over Sebelius-- maybe they're just doing things one thing at a time and after the Sebelius nomination is passed they will be free to focus on Johnsen. They (both the Democrats and outside liberal groups) have been working on these nominations at a pretty steady clip all year.
But it's also clear Johnsen (and I assume Koh is in the same boat?) is going to be harder to get through than the other nominees-- Ben Nelson is likely to vote against her, for example-- and this is going to require a pretty tough fight by all involved. Hopefully this will be a high priority once Sebelius is out of the way and the top-level cabinet posts are finally filled out.
April 27, 2009 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
This all boils down to repuglicans deciding Obama's push for bipartisanship is a sign of weakness and should be exploited at every opportunity. The blue-dog Democrats pose a serious problem for the Democrats. Technically, they're Democrats in name only, and repuglicans to the core. That weakens the Democrat hold on the majority and allows the repuglicans to engage in political gurellia warfare in the Chambers and not worry about the repercussions of their actions. Sad fact is we Democrats really didn't gain as much leverage in the Senate as we did in the House. Reid is really in that spot between a rock and a hard place - no room to maneuver. And if the blue-dogs decide to cacaus with the repuglicans the balance changes dramatically. Perhaps Pelosi will have to take up the reins of governing and push the House to get the Senate to respond to the needs they should be addressing.
April 28, 2009 6:24 AM | Reply | Permalink