TPMDC
« Steele: I Wear My GOP Hat Backwards, "That's How We Roll In The Northeast" | Home | Americans United Ad In Minnesota Targets Pawlenty, On Certifying Franken »

The GOP: Not A National Party?

At the Senate GOP leadership's press conference on Tuesday, after Sen. Arlen Specter switched from the Republicans to the Democrats, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) made a very interesting statement in his capacity as chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee:

"I will tell you that in 2010 we are working very hard to make sure that we have the kind of candidates across the country on a national scale," said Cornyn, "that will allow the Republican Party to regain our status as a national party, and run competitive races in blue states, and purple states, and in red states."

So was Cornyn saying that the GOP is not right now a national party? I asked NRSC press secretary Amber Wilkerson for comment, and she pointed me in the direction of something Cornyn said at CPAC earlier this year, about the need to be a big tent that can appeal to voters across the country.

Here's the relevant portion of Cornyn's remarks:

Now, not all of these candidates are going to be as conservative as I am on each and every issue, it's critical that we get candidates that will fit their states and who can get elected.

But I don't think there's any contradiction between being principled and pragmatic. As I said, I'm one of -- I'm proud to be the fourth most conservative Republican in the United States Senate. Back in Texas, we call that mainstream.

But I have to tell you, I would rather have a Republican who votes with me 80 percent of the time than a liberal Democrat who will vote with me zero percent of the time. You can sign me up on each and every occasion to support that Republican for election and to oppose that Democrat.

Now I understand that, occasionally, we get frustrated by the way some of my colleagues vote -- I do to. But a circular firing squad is no solution to the problems our party finds itself to in right now.

...

So to be a national party we have to put blue and purple states into play. We must be a national party and we must run candidates that can win in every region of the country.

Cornyn's message on what it means to be a national party here seems pretty clear. He was telling this crowd of right-wing activists that the party can't be too ideologically exclusive, and part of politics is to build a broad enough coalition to win.

I spoke to Prof. Larry Sabato about Cornyn's remarks on Tuesday. "Look, this is the guy that tried to get Toomey to recognize reality and jump out of the primary in Pennsylvania," said Sabato. "And Cornyn is as conservative as you can find. So Cornyn gets it, and his leadership gets it. But they're afraid of their own base. They're afraid of losing nominations and primaries and conventions, and that's what it's all about."

Sabato said that technically the GOP is still a national party -- but this is simply because the legal structures in this country have institutionalized the two-party system. "The legal system, or the legal structure, can't make a party competitive," said Sabato. "Only a party can make itself competitive. And right now the Republicans don't have the will to do it. You know, some part of the Republican Party doesn't get it at all. Another part gets it, but is afraid to do anything. And a small portion gets it and wants to do something, but doesn't have the support to enact the changes needed."

So can it be said that the GOP is no longer a true national party? "I would put it this way: They're doing a very poor imitation of a national party," said Sabato. "That's how I would put it. In two elections, they have proven to be essentially a regional party with isolated geographic support in three places: The south, rural Midwestern states, and part of the Rocky Mountain states."


44 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic
"You know, some part of the Republican Party doesn't get it at all. Another part gets it, but is afraid to do anything. And a small portion gets it and wants to do something, but doesn't have the support to enact the changes needed."

That sums it up about as well as I've ever seen it.

user-pic

Yes, indeed.

When one wants to do something but has no means to take any real action in the current framework, the only way out is literally "get out." And so Specter did it. It may not be long before the last group of people (remaining ones) decide to follow.

Purification unstoppable. I don't see immediate substantive effects of Specter's defection, but we should say it is symbolically big.

user-pic

Reminds me of the Dems not too very long ago.

user-pic

In what way? I know that they were not the winning party but I don't remember people talking about the end of the Democrat party. If you can find references for your statement I would like to see them. Thank you. I don't mean to sound like I am jumping on you, I have seen this repeated elsewhere on the net and I don't remember anyone except Karl-the-math-Rove talking about the end of the democrat party and he only said the Republicans would be the permanent majority party.

user-pic

So where were you in 1968?

user-pic

Your question makes no sense. There wasn't talk of the demise of the party that controlled both houses of Congress in the 91st session: The Democrats. There might have been some wishful thinking caterwauling from a side well known for it, but nobody seriously thought the Dems were on the verge of extinction in 1968.

user-pic

Why on Earth do you feel the need to call the Democratic Party the DEMOCRAT party? Do you think that is some subliminal belittling insult or dog whistle to ignorant rubes? WTF?

Honestly every fucking time I hear that stupid fascist attempt at language manipulation I want to call the republicans the "rich white corporate stupid redneck christian party" ...... but somehow I was raised to be polite and civilized enough not to insult people with petty name calling. Ha!

user-pic

Not really. The Democrats were disorganized, demoralized, and lacking a plan. All of those problems are treatable - get a good leader and call me in the morning.

The Republicans are inextricably bound to a narrow and shrinking demographic that demands absolute ideological purity and believes that the way to reverse recent defeats is to become even more extreme and to drive out any who don't speak the proper shibboleths. This might be treatable, but it risks losing the only support they still have. Much trickier case.

user-pic

Fools and cowards.

But, at least some of them understand whats happening to the GOP, but they're just to craven to do anything about it

user-pic

They have to get permission from Rush first.

user-pic

Damn, you beat me to it.

Once you get the mob all fired up, light the torches, and hand out the pitchforks, you'd damn well better keep having monsters to feed them - or you're next. I think that the GOP leadership is learning that the hard way.

All Rushbo needs to say is "no" and Cornyn will toe the line.

user-pic
"So Cornyn gets it, and his leadership gets it. But they're afraid of their own base. They're afraid of losing nominations and primaries and conventions, and that's what it's all about."

For years, the Republicans have been dancing on the edge, feeding red meat to their base: painting dems as unpatriotic and unAmerican and depicting anyone who is not a white, Christian evangelical living in the south or the midwest as dangerous to the American way of life. The Clintons were murderers, Al Gore was a serial liar, John Kerry was a phony, and Obama was a secret muslim terrorist.

They've been whipping their base into a frenzy for their own electoral advantage and it sounds to me like Dr. Frankenstein has finally lost control of his creation. Screw 'em.

user-pic

Damn that Palin!

user-pic

And you wonder why there have been so many mass murders lately? They are "disturbed"

user-pic

Damn you Freud.

user-pic

The fact that the headline to this post is also the ill-conceived and premature and fundamentally stupid title to Zell Miller's 2004 book, about the Democratic Party, is a nice touch.

user-pic

WIth Cornyn in charge, Democrats can rest easy. He's tied with James Inhofe for Dumbest Senator Evah.

user-pic

How quickly they forget George Allen.

user-pic

And Rick Santorum

user-pic

I think this statement is only an attempt to stem the current bleeding, to forestall Snowe in particular from following suit. If GOP leadership takes no real action to re-position the party in the next month or so, the moderates will continue their exodus. Especially with Rush ready to play the role of pursuing Pharaoh!

user-pic

Well, you know, I was a Republican for a long time. In fact, my first job out of college was working for the RNC.

I realized back in '01 that the party was only going to get worse. You could see it coming for years. Hell, the last couple of county meetings I attended were like f-ing prayer meetings. I was like, what the hell's up with this?????

I concluded that there was no hope for changing the nature of the party in the short or medium term. Only a fairly lengthly series of electoral defeats will do that.

Most sane people aren't up for it. Why should they be? They didn't create the mess.

user-pic

Conservatives used to stand athwart history and shout, "Stop!" Now they stand athwart history and say, "Duh?"

The party position is to support torture? Seriously?
The party position is to deny observable, falsifiable, repeatable science? Are you sure?
The party position is to deny rights to loving couples just because of your personal "ick" factor? Is this how you want to be remembered?

Until the ideas of conservativism and Republicanism disentangle, they will both remain anachronistic.

user-pic

Rome went the same way.
Augusts instituted similar religious requirements and for the same reasons.

It's all about empire.

user-pic

What's the worry? Michael Steele is on the job. Why with his talent, they will soon be surpassing the Lyndon LaRouche movement!

user-pic

I am almost what you call a senior citizen and I don't want to sound like some old geezer, but I am in the age in range of many members of Congress and much of the established punduntry in D.C. I remember as far back as junior high school my teachers were teaching critical thinking, analysis of arguements and what is fact and what is perposterous. The GOP is spinning perposterous swill and the media is treating it as legitimate discourse. What happened to quality educated dialogue?

user-pic

They don't teach critical thinking in schools any more. I think it started in the early 80's. It's called "dumbing down"...

user-pic

Here's a bipartisan dream that we can all support. Surprisingly, it comes from Jim DeMint, (R-SC):

โ€œI would rather have 30 Republicans in the Senate who really believe in principles of limited government, free markets, free people, than to have 60 that donโ€™t have a set of beliefs.โ€

Hear! Hear! Let's all agree to make that happen by 2010. That would be change we can believe in.

user-pic

Most look to the early 60s and/or late 70s as the last time a party (the Republicans again) were as down as far as the Republicans are today. And say "See? We can come back".

But its BS. Those were different times.

The problem with the Republican Party today is not so much that Americans do not believe (at least on some level) with their core principles (limited government, low taxes, strong military).

Its because they have become so stinking exclusive. You must be Christian, pro-gun, pro-life, pro-torture, anti-gay marriage, anti-union, pro-war. Or you can't even get your foot in the door. Worse, they'll push you OUT the stinking door.

I agree with one of the other posters. I started out a Republican in the early 1980s. But, have since switched to the Democrats. I just cannot stand the "lock step", must think like I do, walk like I do, dress like I do, be like me, OR ELSE, nature of the current Republican Party. Its disgusting.

And unless there is a schism (break up) of the current Republican Party in two, I don't see that changing. In the near, mid, or long term.

We actually may be witnessing the literal end of the GOP. Because, the way things are and the kind of people that are currently in it, I just don't see HOW they CAN change. They are the epitome of ANTI-CHANGE. Ideological Purity is everything to them. Something the Democrats have never really had to deal with (so when they really NEEDED to change, they could).

Its sad. But well deserved and not unexpected.

user-pic

"Reminds me of the Dems not too very long ago."

I don't agree with this. The Democrats have had their problems, no doubt about it. I have been closely following politics for more than 35 years, including working as a political consultant, running campaigns and working as a political journalist and I have never seen anything like this.

George Bush did not win his first election and, according to some research, possibly did not win the second time. That is a far cry from Obama's historic victory. The Democrats were never marginalized in the way the Republicans are now. In fact, the Bush Administration had to work to cut the Democrats out of things --the situation today has President Obama trying to include Republicans. It is a very different situation.

Democrats had problems, Republicans have nothing.

user-pic

And I've been following politics for 60 or so years. But it is foreign politics where I see a place for comparison. No matter what people argue (to be "nice," to give 'em a "break," etc) the Bush/Cheney years will go down as the closest this country came to fascism since its founding. Military running foreign policy, privileged large corporations handpicked without competition for work, significant deletion of personal rights - the whole schmear! Notice that the fascist parties around the world first demanded absolute loyalty, then reduced their guidelines for loyalty. Rather than broadening the base, it was circle the wagons! Then disaster, collapse... and hope for the phoenix effect. Same now! You cannot liberalize, or make popular an authoritarian party in a democracy. Thank God the danger has passed to the democracy! Too bad about the Republicans.

user-pic

You are exactly correct. The full flowering of American Fascism came with the Cheney/Bush administration. I do not know why in this country we cannot just call a spade a spade and admit that there have always been and will always be a huge American Fascist movement. World War II was basically a war against fascism and you would have thought we learned the lesson. If you look up a textbook definition of fascism and objectively compare it to the policies of Cheney/Bush you can reach no other conclusion.

user-pic

I'm loving this - to quote something completely irrelevant.... The problem with our friends from the other side (of the aisle) is the same problem the Whigs must have experienced in 1856: "Why do I still exist?" and, like the former party tied to the initial W, they appear to be having a response somewhere between Alvin the Chipmunk and Bozo the - well, you know who he is.

That response goes something like this: "My nose is red. My voice is high. I'm drunk and hysterical, oh why, oh why?"

Seriously, tho, the Republican Party may be dealing itself out of existence. Every day, I read true fruitcakes, from Palin to Limbaugh, from Bachman to Coleman, from Steele ... Do you even believe this guy? ... to Santa Claus, I guess, saying fantastic idiocy worthy of Mussolini in his bombastic phase ... (Actually, I don't think he had another phase.)

If the Republican party is on it's way to a Regional Homeland, perhaps Guantanamo would be good. After all, it is 4 Star, as one of them said.

user-pic

National Party? Does that mean they are going to recruit black people, red people, brown and yellow people? Pro- choice people? Biracial people? Gay people? Intelligent people? Non-NRA supporters? Pro ACLU supporters? Muslims? Jewish people?Agnostics? Atheists?

Who am I leaving out?

Oooh, non paranoid, crazy people!
Anybody else

user-pic

This is all wishful thinking. The GOP has two things going for it-- a vise-like grip on the willingness to use patriotism/nationalism as a real weapon AND the allegiance of a very hard core group of activists willing to wait, patiently, for an opening.

Sure, right now, things look bleak for the GOP. But give us a terrorist strike, or some other concocted, fabricated threat to the "Homeland" and fear and loathing will again be on the march.

See virtually every other nationalist nation on the face of the globe and throughout history for other examples. At the risk of offending Mr. Godwin, see Germany in the twenties, Japan in the early twenties, France in the 1790s . . . the right wing, the bastion of patriotic hatred just lies in wait and pounces and regains power on the tattered bones of the fearful . . .

The vast majority of Americans are worried about their future, about their economy and are mistrustful of foreigners, be they Islam or otherwise as being related to the problem. Simply point out a convenient scapegoat and many of the reasonable masses will become willing audiences for and then activists for the anger to be unleashed. I wish we could kill this ideology--but patriotism (and religion) are the last refuge of the real scoundrel and the real scoundrels are the meanest, angriest, most vicious, power-hungry, amoral killers in the world. Given our economic turmoil and we really are only one serious crisis away from the precipice. mbb

user-pic

My wife interrupted--sorry. Add in the fact that the business interests and the fiscal interests of the wealthy, along with the willing abettance of the media, are tightly allied with this group of right wingers and it becomes even more inevitable that the far right will rise again. They haven't even gone very far away-- watch a certain news channel and you will see the loudmouth agitators eagerly, desperately, pleading for the chance to pounce . . . the real problem, for those of us reasonable people, is that most of us are unable to imagine the right wing as evil. We just think we have policy differences with them. FOr many of them, that is true. But for many of the right wing totalitarians to be, its all about power and the means to the end become irrelevent. If its Beck or Limbaugh or Hannity or Coulter or Malkin (and isn't it nice I can write these out, but cannot name more than a few incendiary lefties) their consistency to positions is irrelevent--rather, its their alliance with business and their commitment to 'patriotism' that will permit these loonies to weather any storm the left can throw at them. Those of us on the left are simply too nice. mbb

user-pic

Right you are! Thanks for completing your thoughts. That is exactly what I have understood the situation to be for quite some time now. The MSM is the sad corporate enabler that lets this power game get out of control. If only they would stick to science and facts and not be played with the "two opposing opinions" bullshit we might have a chance to survive as a democracy.

user-pic

Once the country progresses I don't believe it will ever return to the strict ideology of the Republican party. Example: it wasn't that long ago that mixed race marriages were against the law in many states (such as Obama's parents). That thinking seems centuries old now. The same will happen with same sex marriage. The country has moved on into a new century and the Republicans are cemented in the last century.

Japan and Germany were not democracies. I believe Democracy moves forward.

user-pic

Oh God I hope you're right! It's time for Progressives to take over.

user-pic

The GOP: Down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub.

user-pic

So much for the Grand Old Party....more like Ghastly Obscure Party.

user-pic

Back in the day, we used to call them Greedy Old Perverts.

YMMV

user-pic

For decades the GOP has been an unnatural alliance between the ultra-capitalist right that rejects good government and democracy, the christian conservative right that rejects science and historical truth, and the poorly educated and resentful whites on the far right who don't understand anything that's happening around them. None of the three have anything in common beyond their contempt for the country - despite their pretense of patriotism. It couldn't last. The GOP cannot recreate itself in any way that would hold such a coalition together. They're toast and the two party system may be, too - and that may not be a bad thing.

user-pic

Unless I'm mistaken, at this point the Democratic Party has at least one member of Congress in 49 out of the 50 states-- Wyoming (which has a Democratic governor) being the exception. Is this the first time this has ever happened? (Democrats hold all the seats in Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Mexico, North Dakota, Rhode Island, and Vermont).

user-pic

To me, the most alarming thing if you're a Republican is their polling numbers among Latinos and the prevalence in their base of the hard core anti-immigrant folks. If Latinos continue to vote the way did in this past election I don't see how Republicans can win national elections. If you add in African-americans, they start out ceding almost 30% of the electorate and major swaths of the country. Something's gonna have to give. Either they offend their base who are intensely dug-in and extreme on immigration or they become a rural, regional party. Apart from smacking of racism and xenophobia, their current stance seems like political suicide.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address