Barney Frank Faces Down Bachmann On ACORN Funding
In the battle of wits, the winner was...Barney Frank:
Frank pointed out that far from being a bunch of Democratic cronies, ACORN's housing work received a lot of funding from the Bush Administration, as part of the general Republican idea of contracting out community activities instead of growing the federal workforce. As for the substance of Bachmann's amendment, he argued that the low bar of criminal accusation against individual members would give too much power to a prosecutor to go after a group -- and could affect folks such as AIPAC, whose indicted members later saw all the charges against them dropped, or even the House Republicans when Tom DeLay was indicted.
"I'm sorry, Michele, why do you keep interrupting?" an exasperated Frank said at one point. "I'm sorry you don't like what I'm saying."
And by the way, this was posted on Bachmann's own YouTube account, much like another awkward TV appearance from two-and-a-half weeks ago.


















This clearly wasn't a fair battle of wits: Frank's opponent entered the fray unarmed.
May 19, 2009 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I differ with almost all of you on this. B.F.'s points were that Bush hired Acorn to do various housing work because Republicans like to contract out -- that's their philosophy to keep government small, and you can't have a single indictment against any employee as a standard to debar a contractor -- that's an invitation to prosecutorial abuse. Fine. Her concluding point was that if it is only a nice-to-have then government shouldn't be funding it at all, and certainly that voter registration (also contracted to Acorn) should be for the political parties, definitely not for taxpayers to fund, especially given the deficits we face.
I believe she's as mad as a bloody march hare, sure, but I think she made her point well.
May 20, 2009 3:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well yes and no. Her bill, the subject of the entire debate, was to outlaw federal funding for organizations whose employees are indicted. That is not the same thing as saying the Fed should not fund ACORN at all. If she has a problem with ACORN receiving federal funds then she should have worked to strip their funding altogether. That does not seem to be her point. She retreated to the R talking about about reducing the deficit, which is fine but not the initial topic of debate.
May 20, 2009 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, where do you get the idea that ACORN has used any public funding for voter registration? Like a lot of non-profits, ACORN has separate 501c3 (tax-deductible) and 501c4 political activity (non-tax-deductible) arms - they do the stuff like credit counseling, etc under the 501c3 umbrella, and their political organizing under the 501c4 arm. Any federal funding that went to ACORN for housing assistance would have gone to the 501c3 organization, since 501c4s cannot get federal money for any purpose, thanks to their political activity.
Voter registration is for any organization that wants to register voters to conduct. Such as, unions, the League of Women Voters, Sierra Club, whoever feels their political agenda will be better advanced if they get their supporters out to vote. Nothing wrong with that at all - though ANY organization that is paying registrars is subject to the same problems that ACORN had, which, let's be sure, were not the result of criminal intent or activity on the part of ACORN. Anyone who has ever worked a petition or voter registration drive in which people are paid to collect signatures or voter registrations knows how this happens - there's bound to be a few lazy-assed individuals who instead of actually signing people up, just sit on their couch and make up names so they can collect more money, despite the fact that they've been told it's illegal to do so. ACORN and other groups doing this type of work do their best to verify that all signatures/registrations are legitimate, but ultimately, it's up to county clerks and secretaries of state to determine which ones are fradulent and need to be thrown out. ACORN even went so far as to flag the ones they couldn't verify for the authorities, but turned them in since they are required by law to turn in all completed registrations. Otherwise you'd have your college Republicans out there registering voters and throwing away completed registrations of everyone they suspect is a Democrat, with those folks showing up on election day believing they've registered only to find that they can't vote.
Are these the actions of an organization intent on committing fraud? Pointing out the registrations that they believe to be fraudulent to the authorities?
To the best of my knowledge, ACORN didn't even get any party funding to do registrations. I'd frankly be surprised if they did, since the Democrats want the working serfs to sit down and STFU almost as much as the Republicans do.
In short, Bachmann was only a little more confused about how this works than you are, given that you're both operating under the assumption that ACORN was given taxpayer money to do voter registration. They weren't. It's another Bachmann lie. You should know better than to believe anything that comes out of her mouth.
May 20, 2009 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Michelle is half armed. She is a halfwit. Just a loud airhead.
May 20, 2009 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Beating Michele Bachmann in a battle of wits is like beating my dog in Jeopardy.
May 19, 2009 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, watch it. We do pretty well on Jeopardy!
May 19, 2009 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Botch Woman - strikes again!
May 19, 2009 7:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
She didn't even say anything that Lou hadn't already said! She also rolled over when Barney called her out on that eight billion dollar nonsense.
Can we please put her on television more often?
May 19, 2009 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only if she's running opposite someone like Barney. Otherwise she'll be allowed to continuously work herself into a paranoia induced frenzy unchecked by little annoyances like reality.
May 19, 2009 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
dont you wish people would turn orange when they lied?
May 19, 2009 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like John Boehner?
May 19, 2009 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
John Boehner is always orange, regardless of his veracity. The man is a walking warning label about the dangers of tanning beds.
May 19, 2009 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
How would you know? Have you ever seen him when he wasn't lying?
May 19, 2009 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good one! :)
May 20, 2009 2:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
File under "pwnership society."
May 19, 2009 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
F-16 wins dogfight against Piper Cub.
I'm shocked. Who'd of thunk it?
May 19, 2009 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
When you stop to think, wouldn't this be more like Navy Destroyer wins battle against Rubber Duckie.
May 19, 2009 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
How is it that the Harvard educated Lou Dobbs is able to maintain a populist guise, especially after having begun his career as a Wall Street shill?
I'm surprised that someone at MSNBC hasn't put together a highlight video of his hypocrisy to expose him once and for all.
May 19, 2009 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
He is one of their token right wingers. I think it's calculated by MSNBC. He's so incoherent and irrelevant that they can take credit from both sides.
May 19, 2009 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not sure what you mean by "calculated by MSNBC," as Dobbs works for CNN. I sure hope MSNBC has calculated to never hire Dobbs!
May 19, 2009 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oops. yes, you are right. I mistyped!
May 19, 2009 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Kate, it's the pompous factor, the fake gravitas, the I-am-oh-so-serious-that-morons-take-me-seriously Lou Dobbs.
May 19, 2009 9:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Loud Obbs really is letting his white hood show more and more these days, isn't he? The leap from 'scary dirty Mexicans' to 'scary dirty black people' was inevitable, I suppose.
May 19, 2009 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sadly oh so true.
I've known several people who've had a really, really hard time trying to get green cards and/or citizenship, so I'm not all touchy-feely about illegal immigrants, but ACORN? It's trying to register citizens to vote. What the hell is wrong with THAT? Unless there are "certain" citizens you think should not vote. Like those Rehnquist tried to keep from voting when he was a young Republican volunteer in Arizona.
Dobbs jumped the shark on this one.
May 20, 2009 3:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's time to officially declare Republicanism as a mental disorder.
May 19, 2009 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is a bit of a connection. Considering how many Republicans seem to be past/present/future executives of companies, THIS article from the Harvard Business Review seems fitting.
May 19, 2009 8:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Acorn is "under investigation in states all across the country"?
Is it really?
May 19, 2009 6:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
In states with conservative AGs, any organized attempt to mobilize poor people to vote leads to legal trouble.
May 19, 2009 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes 14 States
May 20, 2009 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love Bachmann. She and Steele and Rush and Boner and Dick and Neuter may well help establish a sustained Democratic political dominance. On the outside chance that the Dems actually do something worthwhile, this would be good.
May 19, 2009 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately the dem majority seems to be shaping up as less the greater good and more the lesser evil. Hopefully the republicans can be marginalized enough for a third party to scare the dems populist.
Like the handle.
May 19, 2009 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Unfortunately the dem majority seems to be shaping up as less the greater good and more the lesser evil. Hopefully the republicans can be marginalized enough for a third party to scare the dems populist."
Unfortunately, I can't disagree with you. The Dems in Congress seem to be acting like they don't have a big majority and couldn't figure out what to do with it (hint: follow the president!) even if they did realize what a big majority they have.
May 20, 2009 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nothing makes pessimism worse than being right.
May 20, 2009 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
egads. this was not an interesting enough confrontation to justify losing 10 minutes of my life.
yes, backmann is stoopid. and I can't stand dobbs. but I don't think Frank was so superb here either the way he kept repeating himself
I'll think twice before I trust the editorial judgement here and subject myself to another such 10-minute waste of time again
I avoid shows like that for a reason
May 19, 2009 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
this was posted on Bachmann's own YouTube account, much like another awkward TV appearance from two-and-a-half weeks ago.
Bachmann is really starting to remind me of Nicole Kidman's character in "To Die For" -- a potboiler from the mid-90's about a no-talent amateur weatherwoman who's willing to do ANYTHING, including arranging for the murder of her loser husband, in order to get on TV.
There's a wonderful scene where the local news guys show up at her door, and Kidman is drawn, mesmorized, towards the cameras and bright lights outside -- like the proverbial moth to the proverbial flame.
Is that not Bachmann?
May 19, 2009 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus, Dobbs is such a tool. Acorn was indicted for REGISTRATION fraud, not VOTER fraud. I wonder why Franks didn't bring that up - probably because he was bored listening to the tool and the maniac.
The minimum wage shmucks who were getting paid by the number of voters they signed up were sending in the forms for all kind of false claims. Hey, in Bush's economy can you blame them ?
That doesn't mean that Mickey Mouse or the hotel parking lot would actually show up to vote.
This is what bugs me about Dobbs and Bachmann. Either their research staff are completely incompetent or they're pathological liars, or both. How does this bloated f*ck get his own time slot on CNN ? Oh wait - what am I saying
May 19, 2009 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would be interested to know how psychologists would label the sort of thing that goes on with morons like Bachmann, Palin and other wingnuts who so proudly display their ignorance. This phenomenon of being so stupid you don't know when you've been not only bested in a debate but crushed and then proudly displaying it on youtube as though you "showed em" must have a name or a designation that would help us to explain it.
And what's even more incredible about the indignant ignorance of such people is that they are always right wing Republicans who are ill-informed at best and typically so far offbase and stupid it is almost embarassing to watch them humiliate themselves and make idiots of themselves in such a public manner. I often wince as I laught at them.
Does anyone know if the psychological profession has ever looked into this phenomenon? I would be very interested in learning more of any such research because of the frequency I have seen this kind of behavior over the years.
It's just amazing.
May 19, 2009 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
The technical term is Dunning-Kruger effect, better known as the rule that incompetent people do not know they are incompetent.
May 19, 2009 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I KNEW it! Thank you for this information! It is very helpful for me to know this because I can now apply the proper name when it occurs.
I have to admit, however, that I can't stop giggling as I think about it. I hope that isn't too cruel, but I just can't help it! LOL!
May 19, 2009 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I always thought this had something to do with it too.
May 20, 2009 7:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Could not agree more.
Could this be the first sign of divergent evolutionary trends maybe?
Are these people self aware in any real sense?
May 19, 2009 9:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, if one is as uninformed as Rep. Bachmann and most of her followers are, one is inclined to simply parrot what one hears as accepted fact instead of recognizing it as misguided opinion. One stays in one's bubble happily repeating the talking points and continues to become more ignorant.
May 20, 2009 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes indeed!
And that is yet another reason why the Republican echo chamber works so well on their "base".
May 20, 2009 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Jesus, Dobbs is such a tool. Acorn was indicted for REGISTRATION fraud, not VOTER fraud. I wonder why Franks didn't bring that up - probably because he was bored listening to the tool and the maniac"
THANK YOU polaris1. The only thing "voter fraud"
and "Voter Registration Fraud" have in common is that both contain the words: Voter and Fraud!
Other than that, you are comparing apples to oranges in their detriment to society, with the 2 word saying being MUCH Worse than the 3 word saying!
Do you think the problem might be that there are too many words in voter registration fraud, and that Michelle has a problem of remembering Correctly any term or sentence of more than 2 words?
May 19, 2009 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's hoping Lou does his typical ape-shit-throwing routing over The Center for Faith-Based & Community Initiatives. That's financed via our government and is a reduplicating of efforts.
May 19, 2009 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
"routine" not "routing"
May 19, 2009 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I get so angry when I watch ACORN arguments. They've won the framing debate. The correct frame is:
1) ACORN is trying to register people
2) they pay people to get the signatures on a per signature basis
3) each signature has to be verified - if not, it's thrown out
4) stupid employees try to cheat by getting bogus signatures - they do this for money, not for political reasons, and it always gets caught
Thus, the "fraud" is committed by the jerk standing outside of the market trying to get you to sign and it GET CAUGHT - no Mickey Mice actually get registered. You have stupid employees FAILING to commit fraud (for money) and they get caught and the fraud never gets consummated.
THE KEY POINT: The law says that ACORN has to submit every signature, even if it says Mickey Mouse. They HAVE to. The employee who submitted it can then be prosecuted, but ACORN is blameless. They can't guarantee than no employee tries to commit fraud and if the employee does try, they have to submit the fraudulent registration attempt and let it get thrown out when it can't be verified.
So freaking Lou Dobbs is trying and succeeding to frame it as if Obama is giving money to ACORN to aid them is successfully registering guys named Mickey Mouse. They never get registered and if they did, they'd get caught when they try to vote, but they'd never try to vote because they only signed the damned list to get paid more money!!!
AAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!! THE STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
May 19, 2009 8:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Compare the wrong members of Acorn have done vs. the wrong done by members of Blackwater/Xe. I'd think shooting friendly civilians in a warzone would draw more concern then doing a sloppy job during voter registration.
Also,if the Republicans are so concerned about dubious election activities perpetrated by unqualified staff, Steele is a funny person to choose to lead your party.
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/001973.php
May 19, 2009 8:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, rather than being an issue of competence, I had assumed that Bachmann YouTubed it because she perceived herself as winning the argument against Frank in the same way that conservatives believe that Stephen Colbert really hates liberals and that Archie Bunker always won all of his arguments with "Meathead."
May 19, 2009 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's more profound. She may painting herself as a martyr to the repuglican cause - look how they pick on little ole innocent me, those big bad liberal bullies! Perhaps she's positioning herself for a VP nomination, especially if Palin runs in 2012 - a two women repuglican team. Keep in mind, Palin was a virtual unknown with no political background or aspirations until she let McCain pick her as his running mate.
May 20, 2009 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, Palin was angling for the VP selection many months in advance of her actual selection.
Here's the full story about Palin's VP ambitions, which date back to 2007, from The New Yorker:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/10/27/081027fa_fact_mayer?printable=true
May 20, 2009 5:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely. Bachmann's angling for national office in 2012, along with her aw-shucks governor Timmeh P.
Michele! You go girl!
May 20, 2009 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Aside from the sound interference from the wind whistling between Bachman's ears, Dobbs sounds strange. Is he a tippler?
May 19, 2009 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just want to remind everybody that ACORN started in Little Rock, Arkansas more than two decades ago. As an Arkansan, it was just funny to see the wingnuts jump on ACORN, something I'd never seen done in my home state, which is full of wingnuts. I don't remember reading about either an R or a D AG investigating ACORN here. That is all.
May 19, 2009 9:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dobbs is a weird guy. He's doing something important, namely being Andy Rooney with things that matter. But this is the choreographed op. It's done in 3/4 time, an in septamic pentameter or something. A hack with no experience needs some face time, and some producers have a list of hot buttons. They have a focus group, or a casting session, and they pick one of the haircuts to come be the braying fool.
And the fool brays. They express perfectly reasonable indignation about monies being squandered...
I'm sorry, I'm going to finish this in my own blog. In my own time.
But in closing here, I think you're just the teeny-tiniest generous with Barney. He won, but as the pro his role was easiest. Like Hulk Hogan against one of the bad guys. Wow- somebody should tell Mr. Frank he's been described as a Hulk Hogan type.
He did the obligatory exasperation riff, the one we were all waiting for during the Biden-Palin debacle. I'm glad he spelled out that RNC doctrine of contracting things out instead of doing it ourselves, and I'm glad he pointed out to the inexperienced and somewhat dim Mrs. Somebody from somewhere (I'm scrolling up to check details, but it's not about her.) that her cult snuck millions of dollars to the same organization she's complaining about. They do work.
The work they do at ACORN (ACRON is just an example, but in this minuet I'm describing she must somehow test the last election's hot button issues to see if she can get picked up as a soundbite. This one's looking at the Senate.) improves the way our Housing and Urban Development office works. The indictments I (think I ) have never been indicted, but I've seen the way that cluster F works and can't give something as flimsy as an indictment the weight it would need to change my mind about doing something I planned to do and then started.
I would argue, if it wouldn't get me off the point, that the voter registration work they do improves democracy by putting more humans into it. I don't think it makes any sense to worry about registrations anyway, since they are not votes in any real sense. And there I went. I'm gone.
My son is trying hard to figure out batting. His arm is pretty good when he relaxes, and he did get a base hit in each of his first two games. I think baseball will help us find a way to connect through the years. Have you ever played catch? Birds chirping. Nobody talking. Just whoosh, slap. Whoosh, slap.
Good night,
May 19, 2009 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dude, pass that thing over here. You've had enough.
May 19, 2009 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I sick of seeing Bachman's face on the liberal blogs along with Steele. Everyday we are met with their toothy smarmy faces. Stop it already.
May 20, 2009 1:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Look on the bright side. As long as Steele and Backman are the only persona's the repuglican can put on the front row to represent their political views, we'll have an easy ride in the 2010 mid-term elections. So give them all the face time on prime time as possible.
May 20, 2009 1:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Poor Barney can't get over the fact that George Bush left town 4 months ago. Evidently he hasn't caught up with the fact that Barack Obama has managed to triple the deficit in only 4 months.
He did admit here that he did not always have time to read legislation before forming an opinion and taking a position.
Man up Barney and develop a thicker skin so you don't have to complain about a girl interrupting you when you can't handle the truth!
BTW, in case you forgot how it works, passing legislation is intended to deal with FUTURE events, not history. Oh thats right, I forgot you like to approve the payment of bonuses to AIG employees and then tax them after making the payment.
Do something decent and honorable for a change and RESIGN! IMMEDIATELY!
May 20, 2009 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Really, to put forth arguments based on Limbaugh's point of view is only evidence that you are operating on Backman's level, so all the comments preceding yours apply to you as well.
May 20, 2009 5:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
You are aware that the deficit increase is minimal, and the number you're quoting is in large part due to counting Iraq/Afghanistan expenditures as part of the deficit, right?
If you're not aware of this, you're a sheep, and if you are, you're a misleading Republican thug trying to spread your lies through the blogosphere. Either way your party's time is up.
May 20, 2009 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
If we want your opinion, we'll ask Rushbo for it.
May 20, 2009 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
I tried to watch this, I really did. I made it through Dobbs' biased and idiotic opening remarks and Rep. Frank's first answer OK.
Then Bachmann started up and I had to turn it off during her first sentence. I'm willing to read transcripts of what she says, but I just cannot stomach watching her actually speak, not to mention the waste of time involved. I feel the same way about Coulter, Ingraham, Blackburn, Foxx - all of the "crazy ladies" the republicans have specialized in lately.
May 20, 2009 5:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let's not let partisanship blind us: if Frank had been using the same arguments against a savvier opponent, he would have had real egg on his face. I certainly hope the next time he comes out, he's got better points to make than he did here.
Frank: If Acorn is so bad, why did Bush fund it?
GOP: First, Acorn's record of fraud wasn't so apparent then. Second, since when has the Democratic Party even justified anything by saying it was supported by Bush?
Frank: We're funding Acorn because the GOP doesn't want to expand government - we could be doing this in-house.
GOP: But that doesn't answer the question of why we're doing this at all. We're running a huge budget deficit and we're already bailing out homeowners, so why do we need to throw more money out the window? We don't want this in or out of house.
Frank: Why didn't you do anything about this when you came into office in 2007?
GOP: Because I was a freshman congressperson with bigger fish to fry. Now that I've looked at the data, it's clear that this is something we should take care of now. Just because I didn't do something in 2007 doesn't mean I should not do something in 2009.
Thank God the GOP has tossed out its smartest people. I like Frank, but logically his arguments don't hold water.
May 20, 2009 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Highlights:
2:28 Bachmann's face is a mixture of being completely stumped and thinking "Oh Jesus, he actually brought notes... I'm boned"
6:25 Has Lou Dobbs ever made the point that "the government can handle that better than a private agency" to a republican???? I don't think so.
I used to work as a canvasser for a community group (not ACORN, but similar) and briefly did some verification work. It doesn't surprise me in the least that some of their employees cheat, and the fact that offenders are prosecuted proves, if anything, that ACORN has integrity.
May 20, 2009 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Enough already, TPM. Tell us about the health care hearings, what's going on at Interior, with its conflicted new Secretary, whether or not the "green shoots" of sanity are really sprouting in Dept of Ag, stuff like that, and limit yourselves to, say, one "Idiot Republican" story a day. Is that too much to ask? Some substance, for a change?
May 20, 2009 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank God for Acorn, You go Frank Everyone should be voting regardless.
May 20, 2009 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Bachmann TurnHer OverDry
is really making the point that Federal funds should not go to indicted folks.....wouldn't that disqualify almost all federal contractors....and especially the Bailout Kings? And just about every pig sucking at Federal Troughs?
Wouldn't every Corporate Carnivore have a bunch of indictments that would turn off the Federal Tap? Screwing up all of her Corporate Party friends?
Is it really true, that after scanning down all these comments....Nobody else has made this argument here on this post, or during the Bachmann Frank exchange?
May 20, 2009 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did we watch the same segment? I made the mistake of somehow having cable news on. I was "lucky" to catch this clip...
The first thing that came to my mind is "really? Is this the person that's supposed to represent/defend my values and beliefs?" when I saw Frank trying to debate Bachmann. To be clear, I don't think Frank lost the debate-but its not because he was particularly good- but only because he was up against someone who's C...r....a....z.....y!
I mean his lack of analysis or ability to articulate what he or his party stand for was pathetic. How could he not defend giving an organization like ACORN money to do home counseling or minority/low-income voter registration? Do you see the housing crisis we're in, how could anyone get away with arguing that we shouldn't be doing more of that?! I was particularly sad to see him throw ACORN under the bus and frame it as a "republicans did it too" bs argument, with defenders and "friends" like that, who needs enemies?
someone please give the guy a clue, or at least better talking points.
May 20, 2009 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, the last few times I have watched Frank...here, RealTime with Maher, and I think on Matthews or some CorpMedia He-said She-said shouting match....
he has been long on Wind and argumentativeness....but short on real hard hitting points that get our argument across and shoves a stick in the republican spokes.
He even argues with the Liberals, because Barney is so intelligent that he doesn't think anyone else grasps the finer points. Anyone can be guilty of this, I suppose, but it his job to make the case; not showboat.
I also think he doesn't showboat that well. His mental virtuosity just isn't very effective, and misses the jugular most of the time.
May 20, 2009 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because that would hardly be an effective argument for the audience that Lou Dobbs draws. They're the ones who think you shouldn't encourage low income people to vote in the first place, because they'll only vote to award themselves government largesse, and that people are losing their homes through their own financial mismanagement, and they should just be allowed to fail rather than be rewarded for their imprudence.
Argue that it was the Bush government and the Republican Congress that was giving out the money Bachmann is objecting to, and maybe you drive the wedge a little deeper between true fiscal conservatives and the GOP.
Also, if Frank had had a better opponent, he probably would have made a better argument. You tailor your argument to the opponent and audience that you have, not the ones you might wish you had.
May 20, 2009 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't you mean battle between the wit and the nitwit. Michele Bachmann couldn't be more amusing if she was playing at the comedy club. Barney Frank should be on the supreme court. There is no comparison which doesn't mean I don't have the highest regard for some comedians. But Michele Bachmann could be a character someone developed for the stupid people.
May 21, 2009 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will anyone miss Dobbs? Bachmann is a joke, and she has few if any conclusive points.
August 23, 2010 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink