TPMDC Morning Roundup
Boxer, Snowe Ask For Female SCOTUS Appointee
Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) have sent a bipartisan letter to President Obama, asking him to appoint a woman to David Souter's seat on the Supreme Court. "Women make up more than half of our population, but right now hold only one seat out of nine on the United States Supreme Court," they wrote. "This is out of balance. In order for the court to be relevant, it needs to be diverse and better reflect America."
Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama will be hosting a roundtable with business leaders at 11:30 a.m. ET in the Roosevelt Room, to discuss cutting employer health care costs. At 2:25 p.m. ET, he and Vice President Biden will deliver remarks at a Rose Garden ceremony honoring Top Cops award winners. At 3:30 p.m. ET, Obama and Biden will meet with Gen. Ray Odierno and Christopher Hill, the new Ambassador to Iraq, in the Situation Room. At 4:30 p.m. ET, Obama and Biden will meet with Sec. of Defense Robert Gates. At 7:45 p.m. ET, Obama and the First Lady will attend an evening of poetry, music and spoken word in the East Room.
Biden's Day Ahead
At 11:15 a.m. ET, Vice President Biden will address the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees at their 2009 Legislative Conference in Washington. Afterwards, he will attend the events with President Obama that are listed above.
Chicago Markets Obama Tourism
The Washington Post reports that Chicago is cashing in on Obama-based tourism, with bus tours going to places where he lived and worked. "It's PR and advertising that you can't buy," said Jan Kostner, the deputy director of the Illinois Bureau of Tourism. "We're marketing it."
GOP Whip Kyl Targets Moderate Dems For Votes
CQ reports that Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-AZ) has developed a strategy of courting moderate Democrats to cross over and vote with Republicans on an issue-by-issue basis, making up for the lack of numbers in his own caucus. "It's a team effort," Kyl explained. "Part of it is working with outside groups and with members ... You just have to bird-dog it. Stay on it. And sometimes you can win."
Blue Dogs Complain Of Exclusion In Health Care Bill
The New York Times reports that the Blue Dog Democrats in the House are complaining that they've been left out of the decision-making process for President Obama's health care plan. "We don't need a select group of members of Congress or staff members writing this legislation," said Rep. Mike Ross (D-AR). "We don't want a briefing on the bill after it's written. We want to help write it."
Report: Rep. Israel To Challenge Gillibrand In 2010 Senate Primary
Rep. Steve Israel (D-NY) is reportedly set to challenge appointed Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand in the 2010 Democratic primary. CQ points out that Israel, like Gillibrand is a member of the fiscally-conservative Blue Dog caucus, and he also voted for President George W. Bush's tax cuts in 2001. But he does have a Long Island geographic base that can help him win where the Upstater Gillibrand might have problems.




















Blue Dogs complaining of being left out! The pun of being "left" out is a classic!
May 12, 2009 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I GURANTEE the House comes out with a bill we will be proud of and be able to back fully. The Blue Dogs aren't involved because they would water down the bill. That's the Senates job to do.
May 12, 2009 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gillibrand is vulnerable to her left. Since Israel is a Blue Dog who voted for Bush's tax cuts, I don't see how he gets any traction.
May 12, 2009 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
But two Blue Dogs splitting the conservadem vote does offer intriguing possibilities for a liberal candidate to come out on top. It would be nice if there could be just ONE such candidate in order to make this possible.
May 12, 2009 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gillibrand is the liberal candidate. FIND ME ANY VOTES where she went against Obama's agenda.
May 12, 2009 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
So can we count Snowe's vote to confirm Obama's female nominee? And Murkowski, and Collins?
I wouldn't mind if the next three Obama nominees are women - Pam Karlan, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan (in that order).
May 12, 2009 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seems like Snowe is at least on board as long as the nominee is female. If Franken is seated by the time the confirmation hearings start, that's 61 votes. That means we can lose a Specter w/o picking up a Collins or Murkowski and still sail through. It's all looking pretty good.
May 12, 2009 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll give you (short) odds that Specter votes against fewer Obama judicial nominees than Ben Nelson before this Congress adjourns.
May 12, 2009 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Leah Sears, Sonia Satomayor, Elan Kagan. more diverse, more women, all totally accomplished.
May 12, 2009 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
A lot of subtle negative print stories out there about Sotomayor. I got mine from the hacks over at the Economist-America, where they tried to provoke lots of "questions" about Sotomayor based on an equal opportunity case concerning firemen in Connecticut. I believe the case cited in the article was Ricci v. DeStefano, which I think has a cert petition in front of the Supremos right now.
The amusing parts about this reference to "her decision" in the case is that:
1) She didn't write the appeals court opinion (though she heard the case and concurred)
2). The Appeals opinion merely affirmed the district court opinion in full (which was also not written by Sotomayor) without any comment.
3) Were she to be on the Court if the case were argued there, she would have to recuse herself.
Amazing how the hacks out there approach the law for non-legal types. Personally, were a lawyer to write an article like that, they would be in front of a Professional Responsibility board to face sanctions for misrepresentation.
Then again, popular opinion in this country states that the lawyers are liars, not the media. CW amuses me.
May 12, 2009 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
My point, of course, is that a non-journalist was able to find out the facts behind this paragraph in the Economist in a click of a mouse button. Okay, 5 minutes of research and access to WestLaw. But seriously, WTF? Maybe I should be a journalist.
Of course, my politics probably excludes me from the mainstream. Since I am to the left of Clinton, I must be an extremist.
May 12, 2009 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Gillibrand and Israel split the Blue Dog vote, maybe a fully liberal Democrat out to run in the primary. Someone who can get elected.
May 12, 2009 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
When will we "rightly" start calling them Red Dogs?
May 12, 2009 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
How's about choosing the most qualified person for a Supreme Court seat, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation or age?
May 12, 2009 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Two reasons:
1. Once you get to the level of qualified to sit on the Supreme Court, deciding who is more or less qualified becomes a highly subjective game of inches.
2. The justices are not islands unto themselves. Thurgood Marshall, for example, brought a different perspective to the court on a variety of issues, including civil rights and criminal justice because he had the experience of being black in America. It is a perspective the Court would not have had in his absense. It is far too easy to lose touch with reality up there on that bench, and opinions over the years have reflected that. A well-rounded bench is a firmly grounded bench.
May 12, 2009 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Sen. Snowe wants a female USSC nominee she should become a Democrat...
May 12, 2009 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink