TPMDC Morning Roundup
Bush: "The Information We Got Saved Lives"
Former President George W. Bush spoke last night in Michigan, defending the legality of his administration's interrogation methods. "I made the decision, within the law," Bush explained, "to get information so I can say to myself, 'I've done what it takes to do my duty to protect the American people.' I can tell you that the information we got saved lives." He later added that nothing he was saying was meant to criticize his successor: "I wish him all the best."
Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama will be meeting with Vice President Biden at 9:45 a.m. ET, in addition to his regular daily meetings with advisers. He will be speaking on securing the country's cyber-infrastructure, where he is expected to announce the appointment of a new "cyber czar," at 10:55 a.m. ET from the East Room. At 2:30 p.m. ET, he will attend a hurricane preparedness meeting at FEMA Headquarters.
No Biden Events Today
Vice President Biden will be attending President Obama's regular meetings with advisers today, and will meet with Obama at 9:45 a.m. ET. He will have private meetings for the remainder of the day, and does not have any scheduled public events.
Gates: North Korea Developments Not A Crisis, But "Very Provocative"
Sec. of Defense Robert Gates told reporters that the Obama Administration does not think there is a crisis, or a reason to build up troops, from the latest developments in North Korea. "What we do have, though, are two new developments that are very provocative, that are aggressive, accompanied by very aggressive rhetoric," said Gates. "And I think it brings home the reality of the challenge that North Korea poses to the region and to the international community."
NYT: Sotomayor's "Sharp Tongue" An Issue
The New York Times says that the latest round of criticism against Sonia Sotomayor comes from her sharp questioning of attorneys during cases, in particular an instance from a torture case. "To supporters, Judge Sotomayor's vigorous questioning of the Bush Administration's position in the case of the Canadian, Maher Arar, showcases some of her strengths ... But to detractors, Judge Sotomayor's sharp-tongued and occasionally combative manner -- some lawyers have described her as 'difficult' and 'nasty' -- raises questions about her judicial temperament and willingness to listen."
Hatch: Sotomayor Likely To Be Confirmed -- But Dems Shouldn't Rush It
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) told CNN that Sonia Sotomayor will likely be confirmed. "If there are no otherwise disqualifying matters here, it appears to me she will probably be confirmed," he said. But he did add this word of caution for the Democrats: "If the Democrats don't overplay their hand and don't try to rush this too much, the process will go well, they'll be better off, she'll get confirmed."
Sotomayor A Lucky Gambler
The New York Times also reports on Sonia Sotomayor that she hit it lucky at a casino back in late November 2008, winning $8,283, nearly six months to the day before President Obama tapped her for the Supreme Court. As the Times says: "Judge Sonia Sotomayor's lucky streak is apparently at least six months long."
Nader: McAuliffe Offered Me Money To Avoid Key States In 2004
Ralph Nader has now accused former DNC chairman Terry McAulliffe, who is now running in the June 9 Democratic primary for governor of Virginia, of having offered money to Nader's 2004 presidential campaign to stay off the ballot in key swing states. After years of seeing Ralph Nader intervene negatively in general elections, it's good to him now get involved constructively in a Democratic primary.


















Wow. How dumb is it to try to bribe Ralph Nader?
May 29, 2009 9:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
And it only took Nader 5 years to mention it . . .
May 29, 2009 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Haha, exactly
May 29, 2009 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
McAuliffe had to know it was hanging out there.
May 29, 2009 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
ralph nader: man of principle and integrity!
May 29, 2009 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
If putting the lawyers on the hot seat with pointed and combative questions means lacking in judicial terperment, the somebody should inform the eight justices on the Supreme Court. (Thomas doesn't count because he never says anything.)
May 29, 2009 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's only bad temperment when a hot-tempered latina does it. Justice Scalia's hand gestures are perfectly acceptable.
Ay caramba!
May 29, 2009 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I listened last night to one of C-Span Radio's Supreme Court hearing recordings, which they do weekly. (Yeah, I'm a nerd because I listen to Supreme Court arguments on the radio, sue me).
And on this one, Scalia was just a dick. No two ways about it. A pure-d, unalloyed dick.
May 29, 2009 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Glenn Beck: ‘In Winning Jackpot, Sotomayer Used Fuzzy Dice’
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=7312
May 29, 2009 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
So W. is joining the orgy of self-incrimation? Have at it, stupid!
May 29, 2009 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
oops...incrimination.
May 29, 2009 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who was responsible for yesterdays bombing in iran?
http://www.governmentalityblog.com/my_weblog/2009/05/iran-mosque-bombing-alqaeda-or-us.html
May 29, 2009 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bush and Cheney say their tactics (torture) saved lives, yet they never give any specifics. I'm sure if they they are right there must be a number of examples they can expand on without airing any classified information, like, for example, the identity of a CIA undercover agent.
May 29, 2009 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
John, they're right over there, next to Saddam's WMDs.
Seriously, it beggars the imagination that they would keep this a secret, were it really true, given that they have breathlessly trumpeted Jose Padilla, the Ft Dix Six, etc. as major terrorist busts.
May 29, 2009 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Nader: McAuliffe Offered Me Money To Avoid Key States In 2004"
Maybe this dipshit ought to try getting someone he agrees with elected, instead of tearing down the party that does have some sympathy for ordinary working people.
He apparently wants Republicans in charge. Bizarre.
May 29, 2009 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
the double-standards being applied by RW critics of Sotomayor are amazing. But they are mainly (at least at the leadership level) feeding red meat to the hard core of their base. The leadership are too smart to try to go to the mat on this one.
But the comments by G Gordon Liddy are remarkable, and it is also remarkable how little condemnation there is. Remember Clinton scoring points by going after Sister Sledge (who wasn't even a political commentator?).
The thing that worries me as that Obama might get to appoint only Justices to replace the moderate bloc of SCOTUS (after Souter, maybe Ginsberg and maybe Stevens). But even in 7 years or so, Scalia and Kennedy (the oldest of the RWers) will only be 80, probably waiting for another RWer to become president. At least Obama appointments will keep those seats from being replaced by GOPers (like Marshall replaced by Thomas)
May 30, 2009 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink