TPMDC
« Report: Bill Clinton To Be Named United Nations Envoy To Haiti | Home | Another Poll Shows Paterson In Bad Shape »

Gallup: GOP Falls With Nearly Every Group, Down To Conservative, Church-Going Base

A new analysis by Gallup, compiled from their national polling done all this year, shows just how extensive the Republican Party's drop in voter self-identification has been, with decreases in nearly every demographic.

Compared to 2001, when George W. Bush first took office as president, GOP self-identification has fallen by ten points among college graduates, nine points among those 18-29 years of age, nine points in the Midwest, six in the East, five in the West, and even four points in the South. Married people identifying as Republicans have decreased by five points, and the difference is eight points among the unmarried. The list goes on and on.

In 2001, voters were 33% Democratic, 32% Republican, and 34% independent, with a Democratic edge of 45%-44% after leaners were pushed. But now, it's 36% Democrats, 27% Republicans and 37% independents, with a huge Democratic advantage of 53%-39% with leaners.

The only bright spots for the GOP are three base groups: Frequent churchgoers, with no decrease at all; conservatives, with only a one-point decrease; and voters 65 years of age or older, with a one-point decrease. It should also be noted that they've only gone down one point among non-whites -- but this is because they didn't have much party identification there to begin with.

Late Update: This post originally referenced the party-leaner numbers for college graduates, rather than for all Americans. The error has been corrected.


57 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

When you lose six points in the 50-64 over eight years, only losing one in the 65+ demographic isn't much of a bright spot from long-term survival of the party perspective, what with that pesky inexorability of time and all.

user-pic

With the Boomers scheduled to break the 65 barrier in a couple of years, I expect those numbers to start changing more radically toward the center-left. As you pointed out, time and events (Chicago '68, Viet Nam, the Draft, etc) have a way of bubbling to the surface. Some of us have very vivid memories of our youth.

user-pic

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR KARL ROVE'S PERMANENT MAJORITY!!!!!

user-pic

But on a more serious note, they are also losing elderly churchgoers as well BECAUSE THEY ARE DYING.

user-pic

and voters 65 years of age or older, with a one-point decrease.

Uh huh. Buick sales only declined by 1 percent among drivers 65 and older, too.

user-pic

It's only because they weren't right-wing enough. Gingrich, Limbaugh and DeMinted are fixing that. All will be well soon.

user-pic

Wow - those green bar graphs are stunning.

user-pic

Help us Mittens, you're our only hope.

user-pic

And yet, Bill Bennett openly laughed the other day when John King read the title of James Carville's new book.

Yeah, Bill, there probably won't be 40 years of Democrats in power in the White House. But in Congress? It's happened before.

user-pic

You Think You Know? Truth-It! It's time to unlearn what you've learned. Our future depends on it.
Find the truth & more.

user-pic

Yes! The elderly are the Republicans' future! So Obama's flexibity on healthcare is clearly an attempt to kill them all off. Why, he'd put them all onto ice-flows, if it weren't for global warming...(head esplode in three, two, one...)

user-pic

Dang, I am a frequent church-goer but I am never a GOP supporter. Maybe someone has to start a group called "Christians for Jesus".

user-pic

Hmmm... I wonder what the death rate is among people 65 and older. Whoever those repubs are, they're dying off....

user-pic

Hey! I take exception to that -- I'll be over 65 in 3 more years!

user-pic

"GOP self-identification has fallen by ten points among college graduates"

What do these stats mean? Does that mean that of college graduates polled 10% fewer of the grads ID as GOPers, or does it mean that the shift in GOPer ID due to college grads alone comes to 10% of the total?

Given that the sub-populations are not all equal-sized, this makes a big difference. For instance if college grads were a small fraction of all GOPers in 2001, 10% of a small number is a very small fraction of the total population. But if the shift in college grads who ID as GOPers was 10% of the total population, and college grads were a small fraction, then that would be a huge fraction of the college grads who shifted. And this latter case would be very significant because it says that disaffection in that small sub-population (college grads who used to ID as GOPer) has been proportionately huge.

I cannot make out from the linked Gallup site just how it's meant.

user-pic

Also, this is about leanings, "which party seems most sympatico?" etc. I'd be curious to know if voter registrations have also been shifting too. Did Gallup ask that question too (what was your registration in 2001 and now?) and then correlate registration with sympathy (Repo, lean Repo, Indy, lean Demo, Demo).

user-pic

Thanks. I thought those graphs and what they were depicting was not what Edward Tufte limns as the visual display of quantitative information.

user-pic

Maybe I just don't have enough context to understand the fine distinction in "points".

"10 of what exactly?" would be my short-form plaint...


user-pic

I would like to see a self-identification poll in which respondents had to choose of the following: Republican, Conservative, Democrat, or Liberal/Progressive. Perhaps this is the time to break the two-flavored, one-party neoliberal system that is crushing most of the people in this country and the rest of the world.

user-pic

And I suppose the evil neoliberal system should be replaced with anti-market socialism because that has worked out so well before?

user-pic

I sympathize with where you're coming from, but I just think the postmodern critique of neoliberalism is misguided, and it offers no realistic alternatives.

user-pic

I've said it before and I'll say it again:

IF BARACK OBAMA GETS UNIVERSAL, SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE PASSED, NO PARTY WILL OVERTAKE DEMOCRATS FOR 50 YEARS.

That is what happened in England, and it would happen here too. The problem is, he doesn't intend to do that.

user-pic

There are billions bet against this. Even Obama cannot say single payer any longer. The millions lost in campaign contributions is intolerable to congress especially the senate. The HC ins industry is threatening to bring down the entire economy if single payer is put in place. Currently at 12%GDP we need to stop their profiteering. The billion dollar compensation package for one CEO was the straw that broke the camels back. Enough. We can have a co-op that covers everyone for about 10% of what we are currently paying and it would include dental and visual.

This is the national deal breaker between the people and our representatives and the private insurers will do everything and anything to stop it because they know it will be completely successful and end their money train...permanently.

It will only get through the senate by the reconciliation process and watch how many lobbyists' pet senators will try to prevent this happening. It will also be the measure of our president.

user-pic

btw...this photo icon is a pic of that degenerate Russian refugee Ayn Rand who developed the art of selfishness to insane degrees. It lets me know how depraved modern republicans can be every time I look at her image. So I like to think I'm making her listen...knowing she stopped listening long ago.

user-pic

t obad Obama wont use his office to effect real change for the average american.

i predict that when people realize he has fooled them, these numbers will be reversed in less then 5 years.

not a single policy has he changed or is he known to be interested in changing that is for the betterment of the average working american.

name one!


user-pic

troll.

user-pic

Lily Ledbetter.

user-pic

Increase in minimum wage for the first time in 10 years.

user-pic

Obama is a person and we are talking ideology here where republicans are being soundly rejected and yet still refuse to change. If Obama doesn't get our progressive agenda accomplished then we will try to find one that will but it won't be another used abusing republican. The people may come and go but our ideology will still be seeking the same goals and we will be looking for those who can accomplish this.

user-pic

Stem Cell research.

The conversation about how Obama is just like Bush is like the bit in life of Bryan where they sit around talking about "What have the Romans ever done for us? I mean besides irrigation, education, roads, and aqueducts... NOTHING!! WE HATE THE ROMANS!"

user-pic

If the "frequent churchgoers" are described as a "bright spot", that's one way to look at it.

Another way is to see that the GOP barely had them in 2001 (52%), and after 9/11 and the "culture wars", they haven't made any gains.

So maybe "frequent churchgoing" isn't a good yardstick for political preference, especially in light of the GOP's losses in other categories.

user-pic

Gingrich was trying to whip up intolerance among Catholics at Notre Dame, of course. He converted to Catholicism ostensibly for love of his third wife, but more likely in order to foment right wing idiocy among the anti-abortion zealots. He had success in rounding them up, but they were publicly embarrassed for their small-mindedness, and there must be a bunch of Catholics now who don't appreciate a scoundrel's attempt at hijacking their religion for a 2012 run. He'll make inroads among the hard cases, though, in states like Pa., Ohio, and that is how he is trying to do the math, but is that really going to add up for the smart-mouthing interloper?

Does he talk to Rove about this kind of ultra-cynical chicanery?

user-pic

Oh joy of joys, I see the morning's W.Post is running some imbecilic theocon drivel on righteously attacking Obama the heretic at Notre Dame. You'll want to skip that Talibangelical idiocy, but here is an interesting take on Gingrich's supposed conversion to Catholicism: http://www.alternet.org/democracy/134214/is_the_twice-divorced_newt_gingrich_converting_to_catholicism_for_a_2012_run/?page=3

user-pic

Count me as one of those frequent churchgoers that never was a Republican and never expect to be. The GOP is an engine of hateful intolerance, greed, arrogance, selfishness ,pollution, convenient ignorance, lies, and preemptive war.

user-pic

Good summation! :)

Bear in mind, please, that some of the ignorance is highly legitimate, though! Joe the Plumber wasn't faking by one iota, he is ignorant as can be! :)

user-pic

Hell yeah! Why do GOPers stand and cheer that bald dumbfuck? He absolutely never says a god damned thing that makes any sense with any known facts of any kind. He just blathers unrelated platitudes and they cheer like ..... crazy. The GOPers truly are just useless lizard brains always smelling the raw meat and pushing and shoving to get a lick, a bite, or a bellyful. YUK!

user-pic

Hey, don't hold back or mince words. Tell us what you REALLY think.

user-pic

I'm with hollywood on this 100% BTW.

user-pic

Republican'ts SUCK!

user-pic

"He absolutely never says a god damned thing that makes any sense with any known facts of any kind." Absolutely right. No exceptions to my knowledge. He is always disapproving of things without offering solutions. He actually reminds me of Bush's 2000 campaign, and so many Americans lapped that up, leaving me similarly dumbfounded.

user-pic

Plus he looks like Jeff Gannon. Ever see them in the same room at the same time?

user-pic

Those people will clap at anything that points a finger at dems and liberals. The "he's a Muslim and will bring Sharia law on all of us" crowd think Steele is a genius every time he sneers and Steele cultivates their depravity...just like Rush and most of the other lizard brains. Breeding willful ignorance can only be detrimental and will backfire on those cultivating it.

I enjoyed Hollywood's imagery as completely appropriate.

user-pic

Good show, Brian. Some of us church-going types have known since our baptisms that the Republican party's brand of religion wasn't exactly divine.

I think the headline on this post is misleading. In the same poll, Gallup identified those who cited "frequent" church attendance at the level of almost weekly to monthly attendance as declining from 46% Republican affiliation to 40% affiliation.

To use the phrase "church-going" to describe the Republican base isn't really inaccurate, so that's not my complaint. It's more the assumption that because the GOP has a lot of people who report weekly church attendance, those people who report that they are still frequent church attendees aren't equally "church-going."

user-pic

Good point. Weekly attendance is at the devout end of the scale.

user-pic

Republicans hurt America.

user-pic

So,of these that forgot to wake up: bless them. Even crazed-addicted gamblers have to leave the table when there is nothing left.

user-pic

There was a small decrease among the GenX/Reagan babies; how long before they realize they were fed a line of political BS and covert?

user-pic

For as long as Republicans continue down the narrow path of connecting religion with politics, they will continue to fail. Just look at how President Obama handled the situation at Notre Dame on Sunday. What ever happened to the true separation of church and state?

Here's a Good Read From the Article:
OBAMA SILENCES CATHOLIC CRITICS

On Sunday, President Obama was the invited commencement speaker before the 2009 graduating class of Notre Dame, and was awarded an honorary doctorate degree as is customary (Arizona State University notwithstanding). But his visit to the South Bend, IN campus was not without controversy. Conservative catholics attending and/or affiliated with the university protested and attempted to make a mockery of Mr. Obama's visit due to his Pro-Choice stance on abortion. But in the interest of putting brain over brawn the President methodically dismantled his critics with their own doctrine. And in the true spirit of Christianity, Mr. Obama won the day by simply turning the other cheek.

FULL ARTICLE: http://okwassup.blogspot.com


user-pic

Uhmmm.... This 1% drop in the 65 or over contingent...
When was the survey taken relative to the last mention of the Republican party's position on Social Security? Might be a relevent factor.

user-pic

Gad! I've a long-time frined who exclusively watches FOX "noise" -- and "24".

She KNOWS that the LIBERALS caused all the problems.

She's on Social Security. She didn't answer when I asked:

"Where would Social Security be now had the conservatives got their way on privatizing it to Wall St.?"

So I answered the question for her:

"It would be GONE."

user-pic

Interesting that 'frequent church goers is unchanged.' Does that include Muslims, Jews, Budhists as well? Maybe they were never big Republican supporters anyway.

user-pic

Don't worry, JadeZ — this survey is great news... for Republicans!

user-pic

As a life-long lefty who attends church every Sunday and is elderly (over 55), I thought I'd take a moment to register my dismay at the implication that most Christians are cretinous wing-nuts. Try dropping in on your local Episcopal Church for mass some Sunday. You'll be surprised. There really is a Christian Left, and I am humbled to be called to its ranks.

user-pic

Then there are all of us who do not attend church regularly because we don't like organized religion, but practice Christianity (or whatever) in our daily lives (or try to) :). Some churches do have some good music, however, which I do miss! It's hard for me to relate to these data, living here in the San Francisco Bay Area. I have never met a Republican I didn't like, but then I have hardly ever met a Republican.

user-pic

Boiling right down to the demiglace, eh?

In the end there will be nothing left but pure, undiluted wingnuttery. And at that point, the Wingularity will collapse unto itself.

We hope.

user-pic

btw...this is not a pendulum swing. This time republicans "exposed" themselves proudly as detrimental to democracy and nearly completely turned America into a fascist corporate state, wrecking America almost beyond recognition. I say "almost" because given another 4yrs they would have succeeded.

They cultivated fear, hatred and ignorance in shocking degree and continue to do so.

They must be eliminated from government wherever they are found. They can throw money at each other and the media all they want but it won't save them. National health care reform will prove to be their ultimate defeat because it is necessary, would be a completely successful program and best for the people of America but trying to be stopped because of greed and the loss of campaign donations.

They became the party of hypocrisy by claiming "Country First" while obstructing everything that is good for the people of this country standing only for the wealthy elite and multinational corporations...and this time (thanks to the internet)their hypocrisy has been exposed and the people have seen them for the greedy self centered people they are. It's over for this obstructionist party who have demonstrated they would rather see the country fail than to lose power. The majority has said "screw them and the Jeebus they rode in on".

user-pic

Disagree on each of your points - Like a story teller, remaking history to slant it and create confusion, your claims are bogus and shallow. From a therapy standpoint, we all hope that you feel better now that the tirade is off your check. Get well soon.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio


Recommended Reader Posts

  • Going Green with Gore
    by LisB
  • Republicans and Democrats According to My Pa
    by ~flowerchild~
  • Republican Senators Vow to Filibuster Election Day
    by Orlando
  • Red Alert!
    by matyra
  • WSJ Tacks to the Left of Obama on Glass-Steagel
    by tonnyb
  • Lieberman and The Derivation of The Word "Dictator"
    by igotmyreasons
  • There Must Be A Way...
    by synchronicity
  • One Man's War
    by LND
  • CBO's Analysis of Republicans' Big Healthcare Game-Changer: Tort Reform
    by azpaull
  • AXJ-OBAMA B.C. FOLLOW UP ON COMMENTS
    by AXJ
  • Latest Videos




    Advertise Liberally
    Share
    Close Social Web Email

    "To" Email Address

    Your Name

    Your Email Address