TPMDC
« Gibbs: White House Will Keep Supporting Specter | Home | NYT Reporter: Specter Meant What He Said About Coleman »

Grassley: Sessions' Statements--If He Even Made Them--Don't Matter

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who will in all likelihood take over the Senate Judiciary Committee from Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) in 2011, said earlier today that the Alabama senator's past controversial statements--the NAACP is "un-American," the Klan are "OK" except for their pot smoking, and other gems--won't be of any concern.

The reason it won't come up is because he has been a member of the committee for a long period of time. And he's showed a great deal of impartiality. And he doesn't hold any of those views--I don't know if he ever held any of those views--but if he did he's never done anything in all the years he's been in the Senate to demonstrate any sort of affiliation with any past statements he made. He's been totally impartial, totally representing his people, and he had a record as Attorney General of that state before he came to the United States Senate to be a person who believed in the law and the enforcement of the law.

As I noted yesterday, when Sessions was a federal prosecutor in Alabama, his commitment to the "enforcement of the law" wasn't so much "impartial" as skewed in a way that adversely affected communities in the state's "Black Belt."

In fairness, though, that was more than 20 years ago. Since then, Sessions has taken a strong stance against filibustering Supreme Court nominees, and his positions on hot button, race-related issues such as immigration, drug sentencing, and voting rights, are in line with those of most Southern Republicans in Congress. That's the more recent record he brings to the ranking member seat on the Judiciary Committee. But the development carries a lot of symbolic weight--people still remember that history vividly, and yet the Republicans decided to make him, for all intents and purposes, the party's spokesman on those issues anyway.


4 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I hate Sessions, but to be fair to him, he actually is rather more liberal on drug sentences than most Republican officeholders, and sponsored a bill to bring crack sentences more in line with those for powder -- unfortunately partly by raising the sentences for powder, but still...

user-pic

OK, Chuckles -- fair is fair. How did you feel about Republicans bringing up William Ayers and Reverend Wright during Obama's candidacy? Shouldn't Obama have been given the same pass that "he doesn't hold any of those views"?

user-pic

I hate all these guys. I know some of you just look at them as political opponents but to me they are apologists and sympathizers for those who would lynch my fellow African Americans.

"In fairness, though, that was more than 20 years ago."

You wouldn't even be talking about fairness if he had said the same things about Nazis and Jews. He's an unapologetic racist. He flourishes because people don't hold him accountable for his actions and say "well that was a long time ago."

He's scum. Yeah somehow some of us still remember some of that ancient old prehistoric stuff.

user-pic

Why doesn't Sessions do like Byrd did and repudiate and apologize for his earlier statements? The answer to this question could be telling, I think.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio


Latest Videos




Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address