TPMDC
« CCR: Obama Embraces Indefinite Detention, Not Meaningfully Different From Bush | Home | Charlie Crist: "Let There Be No Doubt -- I Am A Fiscal Conservative" »

Leahy: Hey President Obama, I Have A Couple Of Ideas About State Secrets

Civil libertarians may have concluded that President Obama's plans for State Secrets reform are inadequate. But Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) sees them as a good starting point--for getting the president to support his legislation.

I am encouraged by this new President's willingness to work with Congress, the refusal to do so is one of the reasons that the policies of the last administration were such a failure. I support the President's vow to "deal with Congress and the courts as co-equal branches of government" and I stand ready and willing to work with him on this issue. I believe that the State Secrets Protection Act that I reintroduced this Congress is a good starting point. This legislation codifies the privilege in an effective way that balances the protection of national security with appropriate judicial review. I look forward to working with the administration and others in Congress on how best to move this important legislation forward.

That bill is cosponsored by Sens. Arlen Specter (D-PA), Russ Feingold (D-WI), Ted Kennedy (D-MA), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI,) and Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO).


7 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Leahy and his pals are right. And this is how government shoudl work -- legislature collaborating with the WH.

How refreshing.

(And is that Spector in there too?? Good to see he's making use of that D next to his name)

user-pic

I like the phrase "good starting point". And this legislation is a good continuing move.

But Dick Cheney, the media and the Republicans will say "Boo! You're endangering the country!" and Harry Reid (D-Spineless) and the feckless Dems will all run away, scared.

user-pic

Feingold and Whitehouse are co-sponsors means it's probably a good idea.

All this stuff that Obama is promising should be legislated so the next Bush can't come in and make his own rules. The same should go with torture - it's one thing for Obama to say "We no longer torture because I says so" versus "we no longer torture because we've made legislative safe guards that would make it impossible for the next Bush to circumvent and lie to do whatever he wants".

user-pic

Hey Brian, I thought that protection of state secrets is anathema to our American ideal of "transparency".

user-pic

Leahy is a blowhard, good only for pounding his desk and sending strongly worded letters.

user-pic

Unfortunately, if Leahy is saying that the bill he introduced is the "starting point" for negotiations with Obama, that means the end result, if anything ever passes, will be a watered-down version of the bill that provides little, if any, protection against unwarranted assertions of the state secrets privilege by the government.

user-pic

Not with Feidgold and Whitehouse co-sponsors.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address