Levin Calls Cheney A Liar On Torture
Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) spoke last night at a dinner of the Foreign Policy Association, where he lambasted former Vice President Dick Cheney's speech last week for dishonestly claiming that the interrogation techniques he approved were not torture, and were not connected to Abu Ghraib -- saying that Cheney "bore false witness":
"I do so as Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which recently completed an 18-month investigation into the abuse of detainees in U.S. custody, and produced a 200-page bipartisan report, which gives the lie to Mr. Cheney's claims," said Levin. "I do so because if the abusive interrogation techniques that he champions, the face of which were the pictures of abuse at Abu Ghraib, if they are once more seen as representative of America, our security will be severely set back."
Levin also went after Cheney for claiming that "enhanced interrogation" saved American lives, and that it was no different from what is done to our own people in SERE training:
Regarding Cheney's claim that classified documents will prove his case -- documents that Levin himself is also privy to -- Levin said: "But those classified documents say nothing about the numbers of lives saved, nor do the documents connect acquisition of valuable intelligence to the use of abusive techniques. I hope that the documents are declassified, so that people can judge for themselves what is fact, and what is fiction."


















Finally. Someone with access to the same info as Cheney calls him a liar publically, specifically, and without hedging. 'Bout time.
May 28, 2009 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed! This is huge and should be the lead story on the national news and especially next Sunday morning's talk shows. But I bet George Stephanopolous, Bob Schieffer, and David Gregory won't even mention it. And yet if the tables were turned and it was a Repub saying this about a Democrat, you can be sure it would trumpeted by all of them and a big story would be sent out by the AP so others pick up the story. And to think last Sunday George Stephanopolous actually led a "discussion" over "Who Won?" with regards to Cheney's lies and Obama's statements!
May 28, 2009 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen to that!
Also: how about TPM send it to CNN, FAUX, etc and ask them to cover this as gleefully as they covered the liar?
I have done my share of sending things to CNN asking for equal opportunity coverage, but mine is an insignificant voice to the corporate honchos.
TPM, on the other hand, may actually get some attention, at least.
May 29, 2009 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oops, do not mean that you do not consider him good, only that our media culture is stupid enough to marginalize the likes of him, Gore and Bob Graham...
May 29, 2009 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, god, sorry! This was meant to clarify my *other* response in this thread -- I will repost it there too, sigh.
May 29, 2009 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, if you wanted to get coverage inside the Beltway, you apparently have to be Botoxed!!
May 30, 2009 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
This isn't the first time -- or the only Senator to call Cheney a liar concerning those classified documents: Russ Feingold ALSO read those documents, and said what Levin says: They DO NOT support Cheney's BULLSHIT.
And now Gen. Sanchez -- perhpas to belatedly cover his own ass -- is FOR a truth commission. We have much to thank Gen. Taguba ofr: he investigated, as much as allowed, and reported the FACTS -- for which he (too) was "retired".
I hope Cheney CONTINUES to publicly and high-profile mouth off: it keeps the issue of TORTURE front and center in the front of the public's mind, thus helps build the case for full investigation, and then prosecutions -- among the first for which indictments will be handed down will be big mouthed chickenshit chickenhawk Dick "Five Deferment Warmonger" Cheney.
June 1, 2009 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Howard Fineman: there is a shadow RNC - Rush, Newt, and Cheney.
I thought that was quite clever
May 28, 2009 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been calling them the ReagaNaziCorporation for years. That's the real 'RNC'.
May 29, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Carl's my Senator, and he's not sexy. The Lord, and anyone else who has listened to his stump speech, knows he's not an orator. Still he knows what he wants to say, and when he's done anyone who has listened is clear on what he said.
This speech is vintage Carl:
"...alienated...dishonored...false witness...lie...appearance of legality...false information...colossal misrepresentation...redefined the law...failure of leadership..."
and I hope it gets much wider exposure than it has so far.
Liz Cheney could be destroyed* with this information, but it will have to be someone who won't be steamrolled by her glibness and logorrhea.
* well, at least slightly slowed
May 28, 2009 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is immensely sad that someone as sincere, honest and dedicated as Carl Levin is not considered compelling enough to listen to...
May 29, 2009 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oops, do not mean that you do not consider him good, only that our media culture is stupid enough to marginalize the likes of him, Gore and Bob Graham...
May 29, 2009 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's okay, Radha. I understood.
Totally agree that it's really more than too bad that someone with Carl's knowledge and policy smarts is ignored by the media because he thinks before he speaks and - gasp! - knows what he's talking about.
He can hold his own in debates, but again one has to listen as he explains his points in another way - and listening along with reasoned debated is really, really out on most cable news shows.
I have voted for Carl Levin as long as he has been in the Senate, which is almost as long as I've been voting. Even when he makes me mad as H, and he does occasionally, it's principled disagreement, and I keep on voting for him.
We in Michigan are lucky to have him as our Senator.
May 29, 2009 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
The rest of us in the country are lucky to have you all there to vote for him, too. Thank you.
As to his statement getting coverage on TV, it's pretty obvious that you have to be a shouter and an exaggerator to get on TV, that's why the Repuklicans are so ubiquitous on the Boob Toob.
May 30, 2009 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually Levin is one of the most respected Senators in Washington. He is not in the news much because he has never had a scandal. But I get your point.
May 29, 2009 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let's just put it out on the table: Dick, you're a liar.
May 29, 2009 1:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amen to that.
May 29, 2009 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
"for dishonestly claiming that the interrogation techniques he approved were not torture, and were not connected to Abu Ghraib"
Something folks like to ignore: The official protocols as described in the Bybee memo to Rizzo and presumably eventually passed on by Rumsfeld (I still have not seen Rumsfeld's winter/spring 2003 approval memo to reinstate some forms of interrogation) are not what the low level abuse as seen in pics from AG was about.
approved torture
unapproved torture (and worse, homicide)
approved interrogations
unapproved interrogations
approved "softening" methods
unapproved "softening" methods
I don't know if Cheney approved what Rumsfeld ordered. Maybe I missed it?
May 29, 2009 2:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
You probably missed a lot. Not to worry. Levin didn't miss it.
May 29, 2009 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Levin is focused on narrow slices of this issue and he's trying to debunk Cheney claims.
Levin is careful to parse his attack on Cheney.
""I do so because if the abusive interrogation techniques that he champions, the face of which were the pictures of abuse at Abu Ghraib, if they are once more seen as representative of America, our security will be severely set back.""
While the pics are the face, it is a facade. While it's quite likely that the Principals Committee at least rubber-stamped Rumsfeld's orders, it's not at all clear what those orders were nor is it clear that the orders included the "face" abuse this whole flap is about.
May 29, 2009 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
While it's nice to hear Cheney called out for his distortions, the key to Levin's remarks is here, when he says, "...the pictures of abuse at Abu Ghraib, if they are once more seen as representative of America, our security will be severely set back."
He's basically siding with Obama on the suppression of these images, which I consider problematic. I'm of the opinion that all of this stuff needs to come out because it is the only way we can generate enough public/world outrage to move on war crimes for the architects of this mess.
We've been fighting two wars now for 6 long years, trying everything we can to stem the tide of extremism and embolden moderates throughout the region. Problem is, much of the Arab/Muslim world does not believe the word of America. We say we're a nation of laws, but they don't see it. So to our detriment, more people side with the extremists than the moderates.
To me, the one clear-cut way to diffuse some of this extremism and to hugely embolden the moderates (i.e. to win the war) is to show the world that (as Obama once said) "This is not who we are! We're better than this!"
May 29, 2009 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is not clear to me just how bad the pics would be for us, in terms of inciting more violence or recruiting more AQ members etc. At some point the shock value wears off and it becomes old hat, "same ol' same ol'" and so on.
I don't see the positive value in releasing pics out of context, regardless of the possible negative consequences some worry about re recruitment.
May 29, 2009 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
United States policy vis a vis the War on Terror;
Do as we say, not as we do.
May 29, 2009 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I sometimes wonder, if it were discovered that GWBush murdered the butler, would Obama refuse to condemn him for it, and simply change the policy so that butlers could only be severely wounded. And, then say he only looks forward, not backward.
May 29, 2009 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
hoppy,
Obama is behaving in much the same way Bush's lawyer might behave. I am almost completely disillusioned with him.
May 29, 2009 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
But Hoppy, we need not dwell in the past now do we? We need to look forward and not "criminalize policy differences". Why can't you just get over it and help turn the page huh? LMAO!
May 29, 2009 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
This should be uploaded onto YouTube.
May 29, 2009 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Until we declassify the briefings, it's just hot air from a bunch windbags.
May 29, 2009 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
This will be yet one more of the thousands of examples that the Media are wired for conservatives. They are NOT "liberal".
Levin won't get a tenth of the time on the air that Cheney, Newt or any number of OTHER crackpot righties get.
Sheeeesh. They put on Cheney's daughter, fer crissakes.
Does Levin have kids? Maybe he should push to send them around to producers as well. My guess is he won't find any takers.
The Media slant right. Conservatives have been whining about the so-called "liberal bias" that never was for decades. But it's all in their flea brains.
The Media support the Establishment, and the Establishment is basically conservative. At best, centrist. It's not progressive or liberal.
And that hurts the country.
May 29, 2009 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Until we declassify the briefings, it's just hot air from a bunch windbags.
May 29, 2009 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I distinctly recall that none other than Pat Buchanan said that the whole "liberal news media bias" thing was not true and that it was something they thought up to use during the Nixon Administration when he was there!
May 29, 2009 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for that info. Did not know that. But it sounds more than right. A lot of things started with Nixon, in fact. And ended.
The Dems, basically, boiled down, gave up on their liberal base roughly in 1973. A casualty of the war and McGovern's fortunes.
There really hasn't been anything close to a cohesive "liberal" institutional structure of any kind since then. The entire Limbaugh/Hannity/O'Really wing of the conservative movement is more than a day late and a dollar short. They're actually several decades behind, fighting an imaginary enemy, that even in its heyday had little power in America. In 2009? It has just about none.
Bobby Kennedy, in 1968, was basically our last chance. No liberal/progressive since his time has been able to gain major power in America.
May 29, 2009 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The Media support the Establishment, and the Establishment is basically conservative"
This statement says everything, and is the real reason why any attempts to get the truth out about any kind of government excesses in defense of capitalism will always fail. Too bad Obama is one of them now.
May 29, 2009 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama seems to be taking the Clinton way. Centrist on a lot of issues. A shame. I think he had the opportunity to move the country in the progressive direction, and I'm disappointed that he hasn't done so with pride. We have better ideas by far. Conservative ideas, once put into practice, always prove to be failures for the vast majority of Americans. They are obviously geared for the rich and for the religious right, and are not in this country's best interest as a whole.
Obama had/has a once in a generation chance to boldly change directions. He hasn't so far. He has been able to move us in some cases from the hard right to the middle. Which is an improvement. But not what I (and probably most viewers of TPM) had hoped.
We're correct on the issues. We should implement our solutions without hesitation. The right is going to bitch and complain regardless. They'll bitch and complain about centrist moves as well, and try to paint them in apocalyptic terms. Why not really give them something to cry about?
:>)
May 29, 2009 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
It isn't as important where the media are on the political spectrum as it is whether or not they do a good job of reporting the news. It's quite clear that the corporate media does not do a good job of reporting the news. They see their job as making money. That, they are having a harder time doing these days, but they're much better at that than they are at reporting news.
May 29, 2009 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could someone with more knowledge than I post a site or explain the process that documents are classified or declassified... and if it is all just a subjective decision or if actual objective criteria exists?
Thanks much...
May 29, 2009 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry, but that information is classified.
May 29, 2009 9:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Classified" is whatever Cheney didn't want you to see when he was in office. "Unclassified" is what he didn't want you to see when he was in office but DOES want you to see now.
Got that?
May 30, 2009 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's a shame Cheney wasn't lying about sex. Then he'd be in a lot of trouble.
May 29, 2009 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
So true. So funny. So sad.
May 30, 2009 6:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
FANTASTIC! And about f-ing time some important Dem went after that lying POS Cheney. I hope to god Cheney winds up in prison.
May 29, 2009 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
At long last, the real, dirty "L-word" in American politics is being used. No, not "liberal" but "liar"! And it's about time it was used clearly and unequivocally, as in "Dick Cheney is a liar".
There was a time when there were principled GOPers who, when confronted by the perfidy of their own leadership, could actually admit it (see Barry Goldwater re: Richard Nixon). Sadly, those days are gone.
May 29, 2009 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Blah blah blah . . .
Just yesterday, I posted the following in another thread about this declassification issue and the "photos" . . .
Other than his feelings possibly being different than mine about the release of the "photos," apparently Senator Levine sees this issue about the declassification the same way.
Until it all comes out in the wash, every other individual as an elected representative in the U.S. Congress that has not taken action to get this whole mess out in the open will still be considered a party to the cover-up.
~OGD~
May 29, 2009 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's suppose Cheney could be called to accountability for his roll in "enhanced interrogation;" Is he man enough to not point the finger at Rumsfeld, Gonzales, and one or two others and not say, "How 'bout them, they were in on it too."
He isn't man enough to do that.
May 29, 2009 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is not news. It was not said by Newt Gingrich. By definition, it is not newsworthy.
May 29, 2009 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think that torture will ever help to foster the international cooperation that we need to solve the biggest problems that beset the world today. The US should instead improve its image and help to safeguard national security by focusing more on alleviating severe poverty abroad. The Borgen Project has good info on the estimated cost of ending global poverty:
$30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger.
$550 billion: U.S. Defense budget.
May 29, 2009 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Waterboardgate?
In Terror Gate!
Hang 'em high!
May 29, 2009 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it possible that Cheney is not lying but delusional? That he has lost the ability to comprehend that the documents he is reading do not support his claims, or may even refute them?
May 29, 2009 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
A very good question.
Was Pol Pot delusional? Was Hitler delusional? Is Kim Jong Il delusional?
Yes, I would think. But perhaps that's because I have a really hard time thinking sane people can do such horrible things.
So where is the line between cheating on your taxes and torturing people? Between doing things you know are "bad," and doing things everyone else would say are "evil?"
May 30, 2009 7:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cheney is setting up the temporary insanity defense for himself. Will it work?
May 29, 2009 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Levin's outcry against the lying Mr. Cheney helps cement the only true legacy of the Bush administration--torture. Ah yes, how bitter it is. George Bush, the torture president.
May 29, 2009 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let us not forget torture also produced false evidence from Zachary, used by Powell in his UN speech to justify invasion of Iraq.
May 30, 2009 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
CHENEY IS A WAR CRIMINAL. PROSECUTE. There is more than enough evidence that he was trying to extract false confessions so he could justify sending his Haliburton Company over to Iraq and steal billions of dollars to enrich himself and his friends. Hell, he is no better than Bush's grandfather who funded Hitler's war. No wonder he thought he would be Bush's best choice for Vice President. War criminals think they can stick together. What happens when honest people like those now testifying about his crimes come to the surface. Let's find out.....
May 30, 2009 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now that the Bush-Cheney Thugs are out of power, they can no longer use "War on Terror", "National Security" or even "Global Economy" to cover-up their graft and corruption. Nobody is Above the Law... Follow the Evidence... Follow the MONEY... Prosecute the Criminals!
May 31, 2009 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just searched for "sen carl levin" on both the NY Times and Wash Post sites. Nada about this speech.
They put Pravda to shame.
June 1, 2009 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not a peep on the Sunday shows.
Shocked. I'm shocked, I tell you.
June 1, 2009 12:42 AM | Reply | Permalink