TPMDC
« TPMDC Sunday Roundup | Home | Specter Modifies Misleading Cancer Website »

TPMDC Morning Roundup

Obama Meeting With Health Industry On Lowering Costs
President Obama is meeting today with drug companies, insurance companies, hospital executives and doctors to work on an industry initiative to decrease health care costs by $2 trillion over 10 years. The New York Times points out that the government wouldn't necessarily have a direct way to hold industry to these promises, but that the industry itself is undertaking this initiative in order to head off direct price constraints from being imposed by the government.

Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama will be meeting with health care reform stakeholders at 11:30 a.m. ET in the Roosevelt Room. At 12:30 p.m. ET, he will deliver remarks from the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, on reforming the health care system and reducing costs. At 2 p.m. ET, he will welcome the University of North Carolina men's basketball team an the South Portico.

No Biden Public Events Today
Vice President Biden is in Washington today, and will attend the President's regular morning meetings. He will spend the rest of the day in private meetings, and does not have any scheduled public events.

Biden Takes Key Role In SCOTUS Search
The Washington Post reports that Vice President Biden has become a central figure in the Obama Administration's search for a Supreme Court nominee. "The president is basically taking advantage of my experiences by asking me nuanced questions about both individuals and timing," Biden explained. "We've gone through specific nominees, which we're burrowing in on."

Romer Predicts Continued Increases In Unemployment
Christina Romer, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said yesterday that she expects the unemployment rate to continue to rise until 2010, due to the economy needing to grow at 2.5% in order to produce any gains in employment. She also said long-term changes in behavior would be made: "The chance that consumers are ever going to go back to their high-spending ways is not very plausible, nor do I think they should."

Orszag Likens Obama's Cost-Cutting To Broken-Windows Theory
White House Budget Director Peter Orszag has posted a new op-ed piece with USA Today, advocating on behalf of President Obama's proposed cost-cutting measures in the face of media criticism that they are insufficient, token gestures. "Just like broken windows have been shown to increase crime," Orszag writes, "perpetuating inefficient programs undermines confidence in government and is a poor use of taxpayers' money."

Crist Expected To Declare Senate Bid Tuesday
Gov. Charlie Crist (R-FL) is expected to announce tomorrow that he is running for the U.S. Senate seat held by retiring GOP Sen. Mel Martinez. Crist will start out as the immediate frontrunner, though he faces a primary challenge from former state House Speaker Marco Rubio, who will likely attack Crist from the right on Crist's support for the stimulus bill, and the Democrats will also be ready to keep on fighting in this perennial swing state.

Stephanopoulos: Edwards Staffers Planned To Sabotage Him
George Stephanopoulos reports that when some John Edwards campaign staffers began to think in late 2007 that the rumors of his affair were true, they planned a "Doomsday Scenario" to sabotage him: "They said they were Democrats first, and if it looked like Edwards was going to become the nominee, they were going to bring down the campaign."


17 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

U.S. journalist to be released from Iran today. I hope this happens.

user-pic

I'm fascinated by the Edwards story.

I wonder what exactly these staffers were planning. In addition, when were they expecting to put the plan into action? How far were they going to let Edwards go? I would think that if their intention was to minimize damage to the party, they couldn't have let him get very far without ending up with a seriously weakened nominee.

user-pic

I was wondering about this as well. I think at the time journalists were pretty well aware that there was a rumor that Edwards had had an affair, but they wouldn't publish anything about it because they had no solid evidence. So all the staffers would have to do is provide that evidence or at least point journalists in the right direction and let the rest take care of itself.

user-pic
So all the staffers would have to do is provide that evidence or at least point journalists in the right direction and let the rest take care of itself.

Could you just imagine the circus it would've been if Edwards had won Iowa and/or New Hampshire and then the story broke? Uuugghhh...

user-pic

It's a horrific thought indeed. My only solace is that it would have provided a boost to the sex-scandal-free Barack Obama.

Then again, if Obama hadn't won Iowa, his campaign might have died then and there. And then McCain might not have chosen Sarah Palin as his running mate. And what if what if what if...

Whew. I just realized how amazing 2008 was all over again.

user-pic

Just think, Edward's staffers had a plan to sabotage his campaign. Clinton's staffers accomplished the same thing without a plan.

user-pic

Touche!

I got an e-mail a couple weeks ago asking to help retire Hillary's debt. As much as I like and admire Hillary, I'm not helping her pay Mark Penn's bill.

user-pic

Don't you think it's interesting, though, that his staff is more than willing to take him money to help him win a victory, that, if successful, they'll sabotage. Interesting ethics.

user-pic

Whether true or not, it is very hard to believe *anything* Stephanopoulos "reports". He has a long track record of kowtowing and fawning to Republicans and of course his (and Charles Gibson's) behavior in the primary debate was beyond reprehensible (flag pins, anyone?). Stephanopoulos has zero credibility and ranks the same as David Gregory. Both pump up the Repubs when there is nothing to pump up. And as I stated late last week, sure enough, Cheney is all the MSM talk today despite the fact that he has abysmal approval ratings and his party was trounced in November. No losing party VP who is so despised nationally has ever received such fawning. If they had acted the same way towards Al Gore, they would have treated him as a king. But of course they just treated him as a sore loser even though he clearly won FL in 2000.

user-pic
the government wouldn't necessarily have a direct way to hold industry to these promises, but that the industry itself is undertaking this initiative in order to head off direct price constraints from being imposed by the government.

It's a classic preemptive move by the industry -- in its own way, more insidious and dangerous than outright opposition to health care reform. Which is why the administration should welcome their move but hold firm on putting real teeth into health care reform to hold them accountable. The history of the Bush administration makes crystal clear that "voluntary compliance" is bullshit.

user-pic

The health care news is BIG! However I would be cautiously optomistic. The reason all these groups are at the table is because they KNOW the bill will be passed with or without them so they want to be in the tent instead of out. I want someone so badly to ask Obama to say, no spin no long drawn out answers, but just say "THERE WILL BE A PUBLIC OPTION IN THE HEALTH CARE PLAN" I need reassurance from our President.

user-pic

Yeah, the public plan should be non-negotiable. If private health insurance is so great, they should be able to compete, if not in cost at least in service. But alas, competition is not what those oligopolists want!

user-pic

I don't know if other markets are getting all the commercials. But the DC media markets are beginning to get a stream of both pro and anti health care plans. MoveOn.org has a pretty good one. There's another one going directly after one of the guys who funds the anti public health care plans pointing to his corruptions cases.

user-pic

Whichever plan uses commericals which promise to make my pee stream stronger and my restless legs sleep easy will get my support.

user-pic

From what I can see, this health industry "cost reduction" is no such thing. All they are doing is saying they won't raise prices as much as they have been. That seems to guarantee that health care costs would still continue to rise significantly faster than inflation under their plan.

We need a public single payer plan.

user-pic

So Jake Tapper over at ABC is covering his fellow villagers tut tutting over Wanda Sykes going too far. When Jake acknowledges he himself started the "Obama played the race card" controversy back
during the campaign, he might restore some credibility with me.

user-pic

The fact that Wanda Sykes is news to the Right Wing is further proof that they have nothing. As if blathering on and on about Obama's choice of Hamburger condiment wasn't vapid enough.

The Healthcare industry is trying to pull a fast one here - they're offering this "big" savings, but doesn't want any binding regulation to hold them to it. If regulation is still pushed they'll pull this offer and it will look like Obama just kissed away $2T in potential savings. It's a trap!!

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address