On Meet The Press, It's High-Ranking Dem Dick Durbin Versus ... Newt Gingrich
It may be further evidence of the Republican Party's current doldrums that a top party spokesman, who will appear on Meet The Press this Sunday to debate a high-ranking Democrat, is none other than Newt Gingrich.
Gingrich will be facing off against Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), to discuss national security issues and the controversy surrounding Nancy Pelosi's claims against the CIA.
Consider the fact that Durbin is a top-ranking elected Democrat -- while Gingrich resigned as Speaker of the House a little over ten years ago.
Advertisement


















Eric I believe the proper way to refer to Gingrich is and always should be "disgraced former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich". You can use other adjectives such as "twice divorced", (particularly if he's discussing culture war issues) but that disgraced and former ought to be modifiers whenever you type his name.
May 22, 2009 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Adjectives you are not likely to encounter: hunky, sane, accomplished, cool, admired, or inspiring.
May 22, 2009 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Adjectives that do apply...melon headed, bobble headed, bloated, out of touch, intolerant, or tiny.
May 22, 2009 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Newtie likes lists. Remember the Newt Contract With America lexicon from the 90s with its suggested derogatory words to use against the Democrats?
He still talks in bullet points, without much to back them up beyond his usual bluster and hyperbole.
May 22, 2009 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I liked how he ended his breakfast bull sessions with reporters when they reported some of his brilliant nuggets of wisdom like giving tax credits to families making $10,000 a year to buy laptop computers.
May 22, 2009 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
For a little variety, you could use "and permanent designated scold" after his name.
May 22, 2009 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
i believe the correct phrase is "morally compromised permanent designated scold"
May 22, 2009 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I really wish the Democrats would put someone on with a set of balls to challenge this lying miscreant Newt Gingrich. Someone like Lawrence O’Donnell would be great. Since that would never happen I surely hope Durbin is prepared to whitewash Newt with all of his bogus claims, contradictory statements and outright hypocrisy. I won’t hold my breath. Also look for David Gregory to ignore all facts that favor the democrat’s viewpoint while sucking Newt’s balls.
May 22, 2009 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for THAT mental picture!
May 22, 2009 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Comments don't need to be so gross, it hard to see past the fact that words just seem to "escape"from you, to derive at the concept you are trying to convey.
May 22, 2009 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
O'Donnell is one of the best debaters, could not agree more, in fact one of the few who could match slick ole Newtie. Hopefully Lawrence could bring up Newts views that would prove his opinion changes as frequently as the wind, on just about every subject. Newt has not yet realized he hasn't caught up with technology as yet, cause he almost always, at one time or another, had a different opinion. It is fun watching him trying to wiggle out time after time.
May 22, 2009 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Was I the only one absolutely disgusted by Cheney chiding the President for the length of his speech like HE was the main attraction?
May 22, 2009 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think Cheney sincerely believed that Obama scheduled his speech to deliberately step on Cheney's because that was the kind of petty crap Bush pulled all the time. He doesn't seem to grasp that even if that is the case, you still look like an asshole if you whine about it.
May 22, 2009 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Looking like an asshole has never given Cheney pause. And the rightwing base loves Dick's assholier-than-thou attitude.
I think Cheney faked the knee injury on Inauguration Day just so he would not have to stand up as Obama was sworn in.
Yes, I really think he is that petty.
May 22, 2009 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with you there... At least I wouldn't put it past him... he IS just that petty and self-serving
May 22, 2009 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. I think he's so petty he wouldn't have gone through the trouble of faking an injury - he just wouldn't have stood.
May 22, 2009 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Waste.Of.Time.
May 22, 2009 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gingrich Waste Of Time:
The new GWOT.
May 22, 2009 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
If only MTP had a credible and intelligent moderator.
May 22, 2009 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
With Cheney, Limbaugh - and now Newt - as de-facto leaders, the Republican party is like a dog gone mad. It's an animal that has been beaten, abused and abandoned. It slinks in and out of dark corners with its tail between its legs. When approached it snarls, growls and bares frothy teeth. When confronted it lunges for the jugular, then runs for cover.
It is a hideously pitiful and hopelessly sad creature. Nothing can be done to help it. The only humane thing to do is put it out of its misery.
May 22, 2009 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Are you saying you no longer want a two party system? I get annoyed with both sides when we can't seem to understand that others deserve a point of view. I don't really like Newt that much by Nancy seems like she is so silly, and willing to be influenced and duped by the men around her. I really need some help to understand all of this but this site seems awfully onsided.
May 22, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Consider that NBC has perhaps chosen to let "Meet the Press" die in honor of Tim Russert's passing.
May 22, 2009 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
durbin did good this week turning the "no terraists in MY state" into "why do you disparage our brave corrections officers?"
May 22, 2009 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
benjoysa,
Durbin used a right wing tactic against the right wing. Good for him.
May 22, 2009 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Theone, NO. It certainly fits his demented delusions of self-importance, but it's still utterly repulsive.
BTW one I'd like to see spank Newtie next Sunday is Howard Dean. He's learned a lot about handling the unpolished turds of the media in his 4 years of being the most progressive and effective DNC Chairman in living memory.
Dick Gregory is an absolute poster boy for how to succeed in today's media (cess)pool: NO talent, NO integrity, NO capacity for shame (very important!) and absolutely NO EMPATHY, which we all know is a code word for IslamoFascistLiberalCommiePinkoSocialistCommunityWorkingSecretTraitorousDemocRATs. However, he does possess the critical characteristic for the Beltway tribe. He's got a boyish charm that's almost a wonderful as Chris Matthew's brainless enthusiasm and he possesses the requisite low, venal cunning of a "serious journalist" who can hoof it with the best: MC ROVE! The man's destined for stardom.
May 22, 2009 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Dick Gregory is an absolute poster boy...."
DAVID Gregory. Dick Gregory remains very cool.
May 22, 2009 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whoops! That was absolutely unintentional, like Newt Gingrich saying anything worthwhile.
May 22, 2009 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
The immature tadpole has presidential (vice-presidential) aspirations. I can't see much competition out there for the Republican nomination......Oops almost forgot Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney (snark). They are still in denial, so don't expect them to change anything. After getting crushed again in 2010, then you will see changes. Either new leaders with brains will emerge, or more likely those with intelligence will move to a new party and the Gops will keep their 20% religious right/uneducated southerner voting bloc.
May 22, 2009 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm. This could be dangerous. It's one thing to have a permanently crippled repug party that never gets more than 40 percent of the vote.
It's something else entirely for the wingnut freakazoids to end up as the 20 percent third party to which the two major parties - liberals and DINOs, each with 35-40 percent - have to kow-tow to form a majority.
The balance of power being in the hands of tiny religious-nut parties is why Israeli politics is so completely fucked up.
May 22, 2009 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like other odious characters who have been 'rehabilitated' by the media (see North, Ollie, and Liddy, G.), people forget just how awful Newt really was. As head of the 'Republican Revolution,' he metaphorically guided the Rs into the thread business...by yanking it out of the fabric of American society.
May 22, 2009 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Consider that Fig Newton potentially has nothing to lose given his complete lack of any standing anywhere.
May 22, 2009 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whether or not Durbin and Gingrich appear at the same time, watch how Gregory conducts the interview. I predict Gregory will ignore Gingrich's past and treat him as though he's an honest and honorable man and one of the ways Gregory will do that is take a pass on an obvious, but inconvenient follow up question to a Gingrich comment.
May 22, 2009 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since Cheney and Gingrich began their attack, the repubs have had something like an 8-point bump in approval from voters so far. The endless parade of discredited, corrupt, has-been white male republicans hogging the media megaphones is serving one underlying purpose:
To win back the House, Senate and the presidency. It's the same Permanent Republican Majority wet dream of yesteryear and this coordinated assault has the imprimatur of Karl Rove all over it.
The Dick's first job was to ensure he & Shrub would stay out of jail, and now that that's done, it's back to the Rove playbook.
Their snide, dishonorable bloviating is not a harbinger of their irrelevance or being in the "doldrums." Hardly. They're actually in the ascendancy and that's their only goal -- they literally could not care less about national security, obviously.
Bullying the sitting democratic president is all about knocking him off balance to disrupt his agenda. And ultimately, it's about keeping the money in the hands of the few and how far they will go to undermine efforts that benefit the public in any way.
What IS strange is that the dems can't seem to see the bigger picture and won't fight fire with fire in any way. Unless they do, we won't even get our four years. You've got to hand it to Rove -- he is still in charge.
May 22, 2009 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well what are you really saying Erik? That the disgraced form speaker should step away from the cameras which we all know he should or that Dick Durbin's influence is starting to eminate into uncontested levels in the Senate?
May 22, 2009 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink