Rumors Fly That Septau-, Octogenarians Might Head Financial Crisis Commission
The House and Senate have each passed versions of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act, both of which call for the creation of an independent, external, 10-member commission to investigate the causes of the financial crisis. And now all the fun is in musing about who Democratic and Republican leaders will select to sit on the panel.
Bloomberg says "[r]etired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker and former Securities and Exchange Commission chief Arthur Levitt are among those being considered by congressional leaders to head a probe of the financial crisis, according to people with knowledge of the matter."
The one thing that truly unifies O'Connor (79), Volcker (81), and Levitt (78) is that they're all very, very old. Levitt has been criticized for taking a hands-off approach to regulation while serving as chair of the SEC from 1993-2001.
But as important as it is to highlight anonymous chit chat about who might get the nod (and it's very, very important), it's also worth asking whether and how industry will try to influence the selection process, and how serious officials are about launching the project in a timely manner.




















Levitt has been criticized for taking a hands-off approach to regulation while serving as chair of the SEC from 1993-2001.
Is that really true? He wasn't nearly as bad as Chris Cox. It's my understanding that any time Levitt pushed back against Gramm (chair of the senate banking committee) Ol' Phil threatened to cut his budget.
May 11, 2009 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
At least they'll be able to get a discount when they go out to lunch together.
May 11, 2009 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
LOL
May 11, 2009 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
What, no Greenspan?
May 11, 2009 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is Volcker no longer heading up the group studying reform of the federal tax code? My inquiring mind wants to know......
May 11, 2009 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
remind me, how is age relevant??
(if anything, being of age during the last depression might be beneficial...)
May 12, 2009 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
Assuming these candidates are in good health, their years are a fucking advantage. I really dislike this casual ageism. Just keep in mind, you may never be black or female or gay or whatever, but you will want to get to be old.
If you don't know where you're going, any road will do.
May 12, 2009 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink