TPMDC
« Franken: "Why Am I Grumpy? Oh, I Know Why" | Home | DeMint Told Specter He'd Support Toomey, Shortly Before Specter Switched »

Senator Who Praised Segregationist Judges Will Lead Opposition To Obama Nominees

As I noted below, it looks like Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) will be, at least for a time, the ranking member on the Judiciary Committee. That's an interesting role for a man with Sessions'...history. In a 2002 New Republic article, Sarah Wildman detailed the Alabama senator's rise through the ranks of politics in Alabama and in Republican Washington.

Sessions first appeared on the scene in 1986 D.C. when President Ronald Reagan nominated him to serve on the U.S. District Court in Alabama. At the time, the Judiciary Committee was controlled by Republicans, but his appointment nonetheless went absolutely nowhere--a fact that may have had a thing or two to do with stories like this:

Senate Democrats tracked down a career Justice Department employee named J. Gerald Hebert, who testified, albeit reluctantly, that in a conversation between the two men Sessions had labeled the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU ) "un-American" and "Communist-inspired." Hebert said Sessions had claimed these groups "forced civil rights down the throats of people." In his confirmation hearings, Sessions sealed his own fate by saying such groups could be construed as "un-American" when "they involve themselves in promoting un-American positions" in foreign policy. Hebert testified that the young lawyer tended to "pop off" on such topics regularly, noting that Sessions had called a white civil rights lawyer a "disgrace to his race" for litigating voting rights cases. Sessions acknowledged making many of the statements attributed to him but claimed that most of the time he had been joking, saying he was sometimes "loose with [his] tongue." He further admitted to calling the Voting Rights Act of 1965 a "piece of intrusive legislation," a phrase he stood behind even in his confirmation hearings....

Another damaging witness--a black former assistant U.S. Attorney in Alabama named Thomas Figures--testified that, during a 1981 murder investigation involving the Ku Klux Klan, Sessions was heard by several colleagues commenting that he "used to think they [the Klan] were OK" until he found out some of them were "pot smokers." Sessions claimed the comment was clearly said in jest. Figures didn't see it that way. Sessions, he said, had called him "boy" and, after overhearing him chastise a secretary, warned him to "be careful what you say to white folks." Figures echoed Hebert's claims, saying he too had heard Sessions call various civil rights organizations, including the National Council of Churches and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, "un-American." Sessions denied the accusations but again admitted to frequently joking in an off-color sort of way. In his defense, he said he was not a racist, pointing out that his children went to integrated schools and that he had shared a hotel room with a black attorney several times.

The committee ultimately voted 10-8 against reporting his nomination on to the floor. In a perverse form of poetic justice, Sessions will soon be that committee's most powerful Republican. And in that position, he'll no doubt be leading the charge (such as it is) against whomever President Obama nominates to the Supreme Court--or any court, really. Having been given the Robert Bork treatment in the past, it's hard to imagine Sessions treating Obama's picks all that genially.

As Wildman wrote, "it has been on judicial nominees that Sessions has really made a name for himself."

When Sessions grabbed Heflin's Senate seat in 1996, he also nabbed a spot on the Judiciary Committee. Serving on the committee alongside some of the senators who had dismissed him 16 years earlier, Sessions has become a cheerleader for the Bush administration's judicial picks, defending such dubious nominees as Charles Pickering, who in 1959 wrote a paper defending Mississippi's anti-miscegenation law, and Judge Dennis Shedd, who dismissed nearly every fair-employment civil rights case brought before him as a federal district court judge. Sessions called Pickering "a leader for racial harmony" and a "courageous," "quality individual" who was being used as a "political pawn." Regarding Shedd, he pooh-poohed the criticism, announcing that the judge "should have been commended for the rulings he has made," not chastised.

And after carefully reviewing Sessions' record, Republicans in Washington took appropriate measures to limit his influence gave him an extremely influential position in the Senate. It'll be...enlightening...to hear conservatives defend the move, or, better yet, excuse it on the grounds that the GOP's only giving these views special prominence for about a year and a half.


43 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Hey, everything is scratched out after the following line:

And after carefully reviewing Sessions' record, Republicans in Washington


This includes everything on the right side of the screen.

user-pic

My text is scratched out too!!! Where's my freedom of speech! Is this the liberal Fairness Doctrine taking place right before my very eyes?

user-pic

Looks like an HTML error that was fixed before I saw the post.

user-pic

Democrats are going to have fun taking shots at this guy. What the hell are the Republicans thinking these days? Even if you really, really, really want to support them, they make it pretty much impossible to do so if you've got any sense of decency or intelligence at all.

Too bad Barney Frank's not on the judiciary committee.

user-pic

Spot on. Guaranteed an Obama nominee for SC generates a 3 day media hullabalu over a Sessions 'mis-speak'.
For Democrats, Republicans are the gift that keep on giving.

user-pic

Yep. The Dems should treat Sessions like they've been treating Michael Steele: get out of his way and hope he runs his mouth as much as possible.

user-pic

wrong.

this is exactly what the republicans want.

an obvious racist, "one of us", leading the charge for the party base.

lets not be naive here.

racists ARE the base of the republican party.

being obvious like this goes back at least to good old boy ronnie reagan.

user-pic

Agreed. This is a "cornered, wounded animal" strategy, that Democrats need to be wary of. Rethugs bring in Sessions to do the dirty work, to tarnish Obama and his nominee(s), and try to anger provoke the Administration. Sessions and other old-guard racist politicians are very, very good at skirting outright racism while issuing all kinds of dog-whistle comments designed to stir up their base and annoy liberals. If Sessions goes too far and is called out by the MSM, then other Republicans can distance themselves and appear like moderates (without threatening his re-election, given his safe seat). If he finds a meme that the MSM picks up on, Rethugs gain. This helps pull the center of political gravity to the right, in SCOTUS nominations. Putting Sessions in will emphasize Obama's ethnic background rather than the competence of his nominee.

user-pic

But the Republicans don't have a problem with their base, they have a problem with Independents.

I am not sure what good squeezing another one or two percentage point out of the hard core right is going to do for them. They need pull from the middle. That will not only add to their totals, but take away from the Dems.

user-pic

not so.

because people like us pay attention and come here to comment, most do not.

very few if any of the people i have casual conversations with are ever interested in this kind of stuff.

so. its hardly i real risk to the republicans when so few actually care,,,,, except their base.

user-pic

They can't win with just their base. 27% does not win elections. They are dead in the water.

user-pic

Charles Grassley has been identified as another moderate RINO who must be marginalized and drummed out of the leadership. Long live Jeff Sessions!

user-pic

This is calculated by the Republicans. His constituency knows he is a racist and in no danger losing his seat no matter how out rageous he gets. That way none of them will get labeled and I bet Sessions revels in it. They may not get labeled but I bet they get embarrassed. Not! They are beyond getting embarrassed or shamed.

user-pic

A guy like De Mint is sure beyond such, and the party looks more and more like him.

user-pic

Sessions: all in for the non-stoner KKKers!

More seriously, though, I bet the Democrats don't even bring this up, in order to preserve comity and all.

user-pic

"Burn crosses, not weed." - Sessions

user-pic

Yeah, he heard the Dave Matthews song lyrics "when the world ends, we'll be burning one" and thought it was about crosses.

user-pic

Heh heh, we're seeing them tomorrow! And, yeah, what CT said: best comment on the thread.

user-pic

LOL! Best comment of the thread!

user-pic

So if Obama nominates any racists, I guess they'll totally get a pass from this guy.

user-pic

if politicians in this country were not so corrupt there would be no place for this racist among them.

but, "birds of a feather".

user-pic

Brian, Now is the time to bring up Session's connection to the Gov Don Siegelman case. Time's Adam Zagorin wrote a 2007 article, "Selective Justice in Alabama?", in which Clayton (Lanny) Young admitted to funneling illegal campaign contributions to Sessions, and others (including Siegelman and then Republican AG Bill Pryor) but prosecutors ignored investigating any of the Republicans yet went wholeheartedly after Don Siegelman. US Attorney, Leura Canary 's husband was at the time, being paid $40,000 for consulting to then AG Bill Pryor.

It's time to expose this racist and re-examine the political prosecutions that go on in Alabama. Instead of heading the opposition to Obama's nominations, we should be questioning whether someone like Sessions is fit to hold office.

user-pic

Scott Horton(www.harpers.org/subjects/NoComment) has written bundles on this case. And yes, as I recall, Sessions followed a parallel path of contributions with the same people that landed Siegleman in jail. The diff? The Governor wasn't tight with Star Chamber Boss Karl Rove.

user-pic

I still can't understand why on earth black people might think the GOP is racist. I just, for the life of me, don't understand.

user-pic

Reinforces the party of Jim Crow as the party of Jim Crow. Brilliant. And thank you.

user-pic

Fucking Nazi

user-pic

Okay. "Fucking Nazi" above is what we're all thinking, though not everyone is so succinct.

But what can they really do to slow a nomineed now? They'll have 40 votes and it must be a significant minority on the Judicial Committee. What can this bigot and his pals really do in such an environment? (I'm not being rhetorical --anybody have any real insight?)

user-pic

Besides do that cute thing Republicans do where they make a blatantly, grotesquely racist statement that they think is a thinly veiled racist statement and then get indignant when they're called on it? Not much.

user-pic

So maybe the bigger story here then is a temporary end to a many-years-running period of embittered wrangling over confirming judges. If Sessions and/or others do what you say, that may help them with their base constituencies (likely will in Sessions's case).

Either way, though, Obama gets the judges he wants. We can think of it as the "new bipartisanship": we nominate, they bloviate, all vote, we win. Repeat as needed.

Wow! It may really be as simple as this!

user-pic

So maybe the bigger story here then is a temporary end to a many-years-running period of embittered wrangling over confirming judges.

My, my. Aren't we the optimist today. . .

user-pic

He can do nothing! They are outnumbered on the Judicial committee and the nominee will undoubtedly get voted out of committee. His only hope is that Patrick Leahy allows him to make a mockery out of the process and use it as a rallying cry for the looney right to motivate 2010 elections.

user-pic

As I posted in an earlier thread -

The GOP brand today is a mix of old, tired stoopid bigoted white men, with a mix of Joe the Plumbers, fanatical ditzy fundy women (Palin/Bachman 2012!) and secessionists. Toss in Larry Craig & Sen. Vitter, add Rushbo as Fearless Leader & you've got a toxic mix.

Sessions is an excellent spokesman for this brand.

user-pic

Sessions being the go-to guy for the Repugs on the Judiciary Committee might be a bonus for Obama. You get a segregationist racist scumbag GOPer leading the charge against whoever Obama selects. How difficult would it be to marginalize Sessions in today's environment?
Let's say Sessions hates whatever woman Obama selects. How long before some media outlet goes in for the kill and questions whether Sessions has a problem with people of color?

I'm hoping this turns into a nice little car wreck for Sessions.

user-pic

Don't expect this from Fox. That Wurzelbacher Wurlitzer will be wheezing at full volume during this episode.

user-pic

LOL Rupert's whore isn't one outlet I'd suspect to come out with that angle.

user-pic

I am in full agreement with TM. Give these folks enough rope to hang themselves. Obama will wipe the floor with this red faced alcoholic.

user-pic
and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever. - George Corley Wallace
user-pic

I hope that Obama appoints an Indian to the Supreme Court. There are plenty of Indian judges to choose from. Of course, the Constitution doesn't require that a justice be a judge or a lawyer. But it's been a while since a non-judge was appointed.

Regardless, Obama needs to have a half dozen equally capable nominees to send to the Senate one after the other. As the Republicans shoots each one down, it'll reinforce their image as the party of no. Also if they are all minorities or women, it'll reinforce their racism and sexism.

user-pic

As I understand it, under the current organizing resolution of the Senate, a united party faction can prevent a Judiciary committee vote; there has to be at least one minority member in favor of bring any matter to a vote. Sessions by himself can't stop any nominee, but as ranking minority member, he's got some influence on his fellow party members.

With Rep. Sens. Hatch, Graham, Cornyn, Kyl, Grassley, and Coburn also on the Judiciary committee, I can't see Sessions dominating the minority. On the other hand, I also don't see a particularly moderate Republican in the bunch either. On the third hand, Coburn doesn't seem likely to play "follow-the-leader" on any vote; he's been hewing his own (very conservative) path and has made general remarks against filibustering nominations. Coburn was also the first Republican Senator to call for the firing of Alberto Gonzales...

Whatever happens, it'll be interesting.

user-pic

Thanks a lot for this!

I don't know all of these characters, but I would think Hatch, Cornyn, Kyle, might be committed obstructionists. Does that seem right?

user-pic

Best thing for Sessions is to give him enough rope to hang himself. Alabamians (and others) like this cretin simply can not stop themselves from advertising their hatefulness in every interaction. (I lived in Alabama a long, long time ago.) Sessions and his ilk think they are very clever and suave, with their wink & nudge racism. When exposed, he'll play victim for anyone watching.

user-pic

This is getting to be snl everyday.
As you all know we changed the iq bar to a droop for gopthingys and add an "o" as they dig through the second layer of earth surface to hang their bar even lower.
Now at about 6 "o" or droooooop for iq level to qualify to speak as a gopthingy.
Good ol uncle al should have thousands of one liners already snuk over to snl people.
Can you imagine being in the same room with these thingys that "think" they make sense?
The thinking part is questionable. Remember, first they must pass the iq droooooop.

user-pic

Who else thinks the book will be called "The Sessions Sessions"? It will only come in color because Jeff don't dig "Black & White".
BTW how do you think he & Steele feel about each other?

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address