TPMDC
« Poll: One-Third Of Georgia Republicans Approve Of Secession | Home | Bachmann Dodges Question On Alleged Swine Flu-Democratic Presidents Connection »

Specter Defection Creating Logjam In Democratic Caucus

Here's an extremely thorough article by Alexander Bolton of The Hill, laying out, among other things, what Arlen Specter's defection will mean for senior Democrats and their committee assignments.

The key takeaways are as follows:

  • Reid and Specter struck an agreement of sorts that Specter will enjoy the same level of seniority at the start of the 112th Congress that he would have if he'd been a Democrat since 1980 when he began his career in the Senate.
  • This makes Senior Democrats (who could find themselves bumped from potential committee and subcommittee chairmanships, etc.) very unahppy.
  • And in a way, that bodes poorly for Specter, since decisions like these belong to the caucus, not to the majority leader.
  • But in the end, the caucus will likely base its decision, to a significant degree, on how he behaves between now and January 2011. And that's yet another source of pressure on Specter to get with the Democratic program.
  • In the meantime, the Senate needs to figure out what to do with him right now. He needs committee seats, even if non-leadership seats, and that either means bumping junior Democrats; or forging an agreement with McConnell to adjust the committee ratios based on the new, larger Democratic majority; or adding one Democrat and one Republican to each of the committees Specter serves on to create room for him.

That's a lot of moving parts. And, as you'll see if you read Bolton's article, Democrats aren't being particularly shy about expressing their concerns. Much of this will be decided in the coming days, and we'll bring you any important updates.


9 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Just when all of the dominoes are set up, a bull wanders into the store....

user-pic

In case it isn't clear: the 112th Congress is the one that will begin in 2011, after the 2010 elections; right now we're at the beginning of the 111th Congress.

user-pic

If anything is actually going to be expected from this rat in return for bumping real Democrats from committee assignments, his vote against the budget resolution wasn't exactly a brilliant start. But then we all know what a great negotiator Reid is.

user-pic

I hate this "real Democrat" labeling. Right now the Democratic party's a coalition. This 'real Dem' labeling reminds me of the 'real American' vs. 'fake American' GOP arguments of last year. If we want to call Specter something, please call him a Blue Dog/Mod Dem Democrat.

That said, yeah Reid, you maybe negotiate a bit too well? Specter not only gets to keep his seat through 2010, but he also gains more power than he had when he was with the party that he's been with forever? How much do you trust someone who just changed his mind in a desperate ploy to keep his seat?

user-pic

I feel entirely justified in saying that a rather conservative (to the extent that he has any principles at all) Republican who just the other day turned his coat in order to save his political hide qualifies as "not a real Democrat".

user-pic

You have a point there. A few people here label any Blue Dog/Mod Dem not a 'real Democrat' and maybe I chose the wrong place to jump on my soapbox.

As for Specter, maybe he needs a vetting period or some kind of probational period. I mean, just a week ago, the GOP didn't even consider Specter a 'real Republican'. (I guess now until the 2010 election is that probational period.)

user-pic

That Specter is a weasel is not debatable. But that's another inevitable aspect of having a large legislative majority in the US system. Not only will you have a fairly wide ideological range, you're also gonna have a fair number of pure principal-free weasels. This is politics, after all.

Still, I'd venture a guess that BHO's congressional majority is no more diverse or unwieldy than those of LBJ or FDR. (Check out for example this "Fireside Chat" from '38, for FDR's intra-party headaches.

user-pic

I dont' think it bodes well for Reid. How can he crap on his caucus that way?

user-pic

Let's not take our eye off the prize. The real prize will be bumping Spectar in the primary with a Democrat that can win the general. Use him this time around and then get rid of him. He is worthless to the Democratic Party in the long run. He is Lieberman II.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address