TPMDC
« Labor Joins Sestak In Pressuring Specter | Home | Will Specter's Switch Make It Easier For Republicans To Filibuster Judges? »

TPMDC Morning Roundup

WaPo: Biden In Charge Of Search For SCOTUS Nominee
The Washington Post reports that Vice President Biden has been tasked with with drawing up a list of potential Supreme Court nominees to replace Justice David Souter, whose retirement has not yet been officially announced but is widely reported to be a settled issue. Souter will reportedly step down after this current court term ends in June, effective upon confirmation of his successor. The next term begins in October.

Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama will be meeting with his cabinet at 11:15 a.m. ET. AT 12 p.m. ET, he will have lunch with Vice President Biden, and it's not unreasonable to imagine that the Supreme Court will be a key topic of discussion. At 1 p.m. ET, he and Homeland Security Sec. Janet Napolitano will attend a naturalization ceremony for active-duty service members, with Napolitano swearing them in as citizens and Obama presenting an Outstanding American by Choice Award. At 4:30 p.m. ET, he will attend a ceremonial swearing-in of Commerce Sec. Gary Lock and Health and Human Services Sec. Kathleen Sebelius, with Biden delivering the oath of office.

NPR: Possible Souter Replacements Include Kagan, Sotomayor, Wood
National Public Radio reports possible nominees to replace Justice David Souter include Solicitor General Elena Kagan, federal appeals Judge Sonia Sotomayor, and federal Judge Diane Wood, who taught at the University of Chicago at the same time as President Obama.

Souter Leaving "Best Job In The Worst City"
The Associated Press points out that Souter could very well enjoy his retirement, having publicly referred to his seat on the bench as "the best job in the worst city." He never liked Washington, and this past March described his life as a justice as follows: "When the term of court starts I undergo a sort of annual intellectual lobotomy and it lasts until the following summer when I sort of cram what I can into the summertime."

Senate Defeats Cram-Down Bill
The Senate last night defeated a proposal to give bankruptcy judges the ability to re-adjust the value of mortgages in order to prevent foreclosure. The measure went down 45-51 -- with Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) voting against it. Said Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), a lead sponsor: "The banks that are too big to fail are saying that 8 million Americans facing foreclosure are too little to count in this economy."

WaPo: Hedge Funds Object To Being Demonized
The Washington Post reports that hedge funds are objecting to the way President Obama has blamed the Chrysler bankruptcy on the demands of bondholders.. Said Ron Geffner, a partner at a law firm that represents hedge funds: "To play the 'I stand with Chrysler, I stand with families, I stand with the dealers, I stand with the consumers' -- that's great conceptually, but . . . I stand with the fact that we live in a capitalist society where companies who don't modify their business plans and stay current die and go by the wayside."

Gingrich's Remark About RNC Members Draws Fire From RNC Members
CNN reports that Republican National Committee members are objecting to Newt Gingrich's defense of Michael Steele, in which Gingrich characterized RNC members as having big egos and that "They all think they're precious." Said Tennessee GOP chairwoman Robin Smith: "Forming circular firing squads only gives aid to the Democrats who are doing quite nicely in undercutting the public trust in our government."

Hispanic Caucus Demands Apology Over Boehner Web Vid
The Congressional Hispanic Caucus is crying foul over a Web video from House GOP Leader John Boehner, which attacked President Obama for putting America in greater danger from terrorism -- and which so happened to include a still image of Obama during a meeting with the CHC. It's at the 1:11 mark:

"It's disrespectful to the hard-working Latinos across the nation, serving in every sector of our economy and on our military's front lines," said Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-NY). A spokesman for Boehner described the complaint as "beyond silly."


19 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

After Biden's "gaffe" yesterday, I'd sure love to be a fly on the wall during lunch today.

user-pic

I don't know. Obama does gaffes too so I bet Obama just jokes with him about it. I am sure Biden realized that he "oops, did it again".

user-pic

Indeed. I think I'd rather oops on that than oops on no WMD's.

user-pic

It was a Kinsley gaffe, and no panic set in after it. I think it was a harmless gaffe, and one that leads people like me to dismiss it, because I take MARC and metro everyday, and no one is sneezing, and when they do, I think, "Allergies." This is a blow-up in the eyes of the media more than the eyes of the public. But whatever. He's our Joe.

user-pic

I totally agree. The media is always looking for their next "outrage" story. Must feed the beast.

It was just kind of funny because right before Biden's appearance, I turned to my husband and said "I know people give him a hard time because of his reputation as a gaffe machine, but I think that's all overblown....I can't help but love him".

I must've jinxed him.

user-pic
"Democrats (...) are doing quite nicely in undercutting the public trust in our government.
Wow.

(1) That's disconnected from reality. But ignoring that:

(2) Isn't "undercutting the public trust in our government" exactly what Republicans want? So that the public will then come around to the Republican way of thinking - "make the federal government small enough to drown in a bathtub"?

I guess Republicans should start backing the Democrats now, since they seem to think the Democrats are furthering the Republican agenda! Woohoo! Filibuster-proof 100 senate seat coalition!

user-pic

A couple more common Republicanisms that demonstrate that "undercutting the public trust in our government" is their goal:

(1) Government is the problem, not the solution.

(2) The scariest words in the English language: I'm from the government, and I'm here to help.

The second one was from Ronald Reagan, who, as I understand it, Republicans worship as a god.

Saying such things does undercut the public trust in our government (at least, it does if the public believes what Republicans say).

And if Republicans genuinely believe such statements (which they make frequently), then "undercutting the public trust in our government" should be their goal. Why does Robin Smith apparently think otherwise?

user-pic

Awwww, how cute.

The Hedge Funders think they Government serves them alone, and not the people.

Normally, they would be right, but today is a new dawn.


That said, the 11 senate democrats who seem to think that they work for the banks and not the people need to be smacked upside the head (although a number of the 'moderates' voted with the people here- Webb, Warner, McCaskill, Shaheen, Mark Udall, Begich...)

user-pic

To Boost His Chances of Succeeding Souter, Arlen Specter to Switch Gender
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=7058

user-pic

Ban the Spammers, TPM! Everyone else, please click "Report Abuse" on this stuff.

user-pic

"WaPo: Hedge Funds Object To Being Demonized"

Now THAT is a fight Obama should be happy to have.

Hedge funds are about as popular as Dick Cheney.

user-pic

I say SCREW the hedge funds. They are just all about money and don't give a crap about anything else.

Obama sided with the people against the evil hedge funds. Obama needed a straw man to do battle with so that he doesn't get the blame for the bankruptcy. I am sure that is a battle that he is happy to have.

user-pic

LOL, you mean this was all theater by Obama to avoid getting the blame?

What comforting sincerity.

And I thought that he was simply asking the hedge funds to break the law a couple times so that Obama could gift the company to the unions, wipe out pensions funds et al that hold bonds and demonstrate the "enormous" sacrifice of only getting overtime after 40-hour work week (not to say anything about elimination of TWO annual vacations for one).

user-pic

That's not how I read it. My understanding is that 70% of the creditors liked the deal. 30% got mad because the deal involved giving less-senior creditors equity.

Apparently in bankruptcy, if 66% of the bondholders agree to a deal the rules of credit seniority can be modified. As Bloomberg points out, they played chicken with Obama, and lost.

Fuck 'em. The rules are totally gamed in their favor through years of buying votes ... and they STILL don't want to play by the rules.

user-pic

It will be interesting to see what the hedge funds get out of bankruptcy. These people are willing to see tens of thousands out of a job rather than compromise, which now the judge will force them to do anyway. I can see why Obama is so angry. If they thought they could call his bluff, they lost.

user-pic

Under current law, holders of secured debt get paid before anyone else get paid. If the judge sides with Obama on the unions, this is going to be appealed until there is no Chrysler.

user-pic

That's not true. According to bankruptcy lawyers the prioritization of secured debt is regularly modified in bankruptcy cases. It's established case law.

user-pic

Is Nydia Velazquez the official and sole spokesman for Boehner or was this person chosen to respond because of their last name?

user-pic

She's speaking on behalf of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, not Boehner.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address