Conservative Activist Revels in Court Ruling Against "Sotomayer"
Conservative reactions to the Supreme Court's Ricci ruling are trickling in. Wendy Long, the leading face of the Sotomayor opposition, posted a press release on the web site for the Judicial Confirmation Network. The best part is the misspelling of Sonia Sotomayor's name (Long went for Sotomayer).

There's also this mystifying gem:
"Frank Ricci finally got his day in court, despite the judging of Sonia Sotomayor, which all nine Justices of U.S. Supreme Court have now confirmed was in error."
The ruling, of course, was 5-4. Oh, and this:
"What Judge Sotomayor did in Ricci was the equivalent of a pilot error resulting in a bad plane crash. And now the pilot is being offered to fly Air Force One." That's poetry, folks.
Check it out here, and let us know if Long fixes her spelling.
Late update: Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), a member of the Judiciary Committee, took a shot at Sotomayor without calling her by name. "The Second Circuit should have recognized the serious and unique issues this case raised and given it the thorough treatment it deserved," he said in a statement.
Here's the full statement:
"The Supreme Court today correctly held that race-based employment decisions must be justified by facts, not fear," said Hatch. "These firefighters, who worked long and hard for it, were denied the chance for promotion because of their race."In the twenty-first century, race discrimination requires more justification than the fear of being sued. The Second Circuit should have recognized the serious and unique issues this case raised and given it the thorough treatment it deserved."


















Yep. This isn't a ruling about the Appeals Court ruling, it's a ruling about Sotomayor.
And that's what the talking point is going to be.
June 29, 2009 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wingers don't seem to spell very well. Recent observation of the Pat Buchanan's "National Confernece" on "Building the New Majority"
In the case of Sotomayor, it may be one of those dog-whistle passive aggressive snubs, like the idiot who said it was unnecessary to pronounce Sotomayor correctly.
June 29, 2009 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Must be all that home schooling.
June 29, 2009 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Faster, pussycat! Kill! Kill!
June 29, 2009 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
They must be using Karl Rove's math: 4 = 0.
June 29, 2009 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
More proof that Ginsburg, Stevens, Souter and Breyer aren't qualified to be supreme court justices.
June 29, 2009 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
She fixed the spelling, but not the substance. From now on, she should be known as Weedy E Lung, who has been characterized by all ten justices as a lug nut.
In a unique show of solidarity, the entire Supreme Court has condemned those who critize judicial opinions while demonstrating utter inability to count to nine. When asked about the tenth justice, the Chief Justice replied, "There nine of us seating on the bench, and we all speak as one. So that makes ten. Don't argue with it--it's conservative math!"
June 29, 2009 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink