TPMDC
« Pawlenty: I'll Certify Franken's Election -- If There's No Order Against It From A Federal Court | Home | Pawlenty: USA Turning Into South American Republic »

HCAN "Thrilled" With Obama's "Strong, Unambiguous Commitment" To Public Option

Richard Kirsch, the national campaign director for Health Care for America Now, read Obama's letter to Sens. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Max Baucus (D-MT), and liked what he saw.

We are thrilled to see President Obama's strong, unambiguous commitment to reform that includes the choice of keeping private health insurance or joining a new public health insurance option. The choice of a new public health insurance plan is the only way to control costs, guarantee coverage, ensure quality and transparency, and set a benchmark by which patients will know whether their private health insurance is truly giving them what they're paying for.

Taking issue with the Senate Finance Committee suggestion that a public insurance option can be instituted down the line by placing a trigger mechanism in the bill, HCAN says, "some Members of Congress have discussed the possibility of creating a public health insurance plan "trigger," suggesting the public health insurance option can wait. It cannot."

Obama didn't address that particular question in his letter, but he did reiterate his commitment to the public option. "I strongly believe that Americans should
have the choice of a public health insurance option operating alongside private plans. This will give them a better range of choices, make the health care market more competitive, and keep insurance companies honest."

Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE)--often a key holdout on progressive aspects of Obama's agenda--has wavered on the question of a public insurance option. He originally called it a deal breaker, and sought to recruit centrist members of Congress to oppose the plan alongside him, but now says, without getting specific, that he's keeping an open mind.



2 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I think they be trying a scam on us though. This trigger thing sounds like a con job:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/02/obama-senate-dems-conside_n_210390.html

"A trigger would pave the way for public option to come into place only after certain market conditions are met -- mainly if private insurance companies are unable to achieve various metrics for coverage within a certain time frame. The proposal would placate many of the private health care actors who consider a public plan the first step towards a single-payer system. Progressives, however, view it as reform in name and not substance."

user-pic

In fairness, though, we should acknowledge that Obama's unambiguous support of a public option (even though he hasn't yet addressed the "trigger" dodge) is real progress. Up until now a lot of people were under the impression that he didn't care about it or at most intended to use it as a bargaining chip. Credit where credit is due.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address