Head Of Coalition to End Judicial Filibusters Now Promotes Filibustering Sotomayor
Dozens of conservatives today sent Senate Republicans a letter, urging them to filibuster Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.
"We call on you...to display leadership, if the nominee merits it, in preparing for the use of the traditional filibuster...so that the debate on the Senate floor is appropriately long and, therefore, suitably catalyzed to the American people."
The signatories are of a coalition of conservative activists called Third Branch, led by a storied character named Manuel Miranda.
In a previous incarnation, the Third Branch Conference was called CEJF, which stands (wouldn't you know it) for the Coalition to End Judicial Filibusters. That, of course, was back in the days when Republicans ran Washington and the judges being filibustered were conservative.
But before he got into the conservative activist game, Miranda was rabble rousing on the Hill. In 2003, he was an aide to then-Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist who, in an attempt to stifle Democratic attempts to filibuster President Bush's nominee, hacked into his adversaries' email accounts and leaked them to conservative publications including the Washington Times.
He was ultimately discovered, fired and subsequently became the subject of a criminal investigation.
Soon thereafter, he started his anti-filibuster group, which put him right back in the spotlight, through the confirmations of Supreme Court Justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito. By then, according to The New Yorker's Jeffrey Toobin, Miranda went silent.
Two years later, though, he re-emerged as the Director of the Office of Legislative Statecraft at the State Department working out of the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. Miranda was just one scores of unqualified people the Bush administration tasked with the monumental task of rebuilding Iraq--but, like most of the apparatchiks in the Green Zone, he played oblivious to the absurdity. "I had experience on the Hill and in constitutional issues, and it seemed perfect for me," he told Toobin.
Now he's resumed the mantle of conservative flamethrower--targeting Sotomayor, and lighting the conservative movement on fire in the process. At least, though, he's had the sense to change the name of his group to mask his...change of heart. Other groups seem to have lacked that kind of foresight.


















Fine. Begin the debate next week. Thanks.
June 2, 2009 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
The GOP is quickly becoming irrelevant. If you have a legitimate beef by then all means fight the nomination. If you are trying to make political hay you will continue to alienate a demographic group that will soon be a 1/3 of the population.
Ask Pete Wilson about losing every Hispanic voter for a generation.
June 2, 2009 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Suitably catalyzed? WTF?
Morons.
June 2, 2009 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe it was a typo/transcription error. I think he meant he wanted to "suitably cattle-ize the American people"
June 2, 2009 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
That really does make more sense.
June 2, 2009 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Two years later, though, he re-emerged as the Director of the Office of Legislative Statecraft at the State Department working out of the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.
Wait, I thought we weren't supposed to be engaging in "statecraft" in Iraq. I seem to remember there being some kerfuffle about this term, maybe 5yrs ago.
June 2, 2009 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think we can all rest assured no craftiness was involved in our policy.
June 2, 2009 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does anyone remember that John Kerry lost the presidency, because he was tagged a flip-flopper? Republicans make no pretense about being completely void of principle!
June 2, 2009 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha ha ha.
So much for an "up or down vote."
"That's different!" say Repuklicans.
How's that Gang of Fourteen holding up?
June 2, 2009 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hopefully, whoever ends up as judge will do well because there are a lot of huge tasks that the Supreme Court needs to face. The US faces these domestic challenges but also international challenges. For instance, we should do more to address severe poverty overseas. The Borgen Project has good info on the estimated cost of ending global poverty:
$30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger.
$550 billion: U.S. Defense budget.
June 2, 2009 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
"We call on you...to display leadership, by following our instructions..."
June 2, 2009 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
If last week's tirade against Sotomayor is the best GOPers have, we should pity the fools.
Sotomayor has to be proven an incompetent, out of her league dunce (and a racist, to boot) to derail her Senate confirmation.
The idiotic viciousness of the made-up accusations is an indictment on those proffering them. The judgement: pity the GOP fools.
June 2, 2009 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
"because he was tagged a flip-flopper? Republicans make no pretense about being completely void of principle!"
Part of the problem is that Democrats in Congress seem to be completely disinclined to really make an issue of GOP hypocrisy in a sustained, planned-out, coordinated fashion. Every once in a while some random Senator will get his dander up, but it's always an ad hoc thing with no follow-through or amplification from other Dems. It's sort of like how they've "defended" Sotomayor so far, which is to say that in typical gutless Dem fashion, they haven't said shit, aside from good ol' Pat Leahy finally getting the sack up to respond. I've been frankly appalled at Obama's apparent disinterest in vigorously defending his nominee so far. Fred Barnes and Bill Bennett and other GOPers have trampled the academic credentials of Princeton University in the mud in the course of smearing Sotomayor, but where is the leadership of Princeton? Even if they're solidly Republican, you'd think that at some point they'd want to defend the good honor of the institution that pays them each month.
What happens if the GOP decides to filibuster? I'm far from confident that Harry Reid can get a vote for cloture, especially in this ridiculously toxic media environment.
Sometimes being a Democrat is like having a child who's getting pummeled by a bully on the school playground every day. Each night you tend to his cuts and bruises, and tell him that at some point he'll have to assert himself instead of just silently taking the beating, and each day he refuses to stand up for himself.
June 2, 2009 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like your comparison to the child on the playground. I also think that there is a level of the mentality used by organized crime groups that drives the GOP. Let me expalain:
The most powerful organized criminal groups from the Italian mobs here in the US to Pablo Escobar in Colombia; the thing they have in common first is that they were willing to go well beyond their enemies in terms of ruthlessness and voilence. Now I'm not saying that the GOP are killers or anything; but I'm saying that they as a group and as indviduals are willing to go places politically that the Dems just won't.
I'm proud though that my party doesn't have some of the blood of the things the GOP has done on us and in the end as all the GOP has left are their extreame retoric; the Dems will be left standing clean and focused on the American people... until we screw it up someday and help the GOP get their power back.
June 3, 2009 8:15 AM | Reply | Permalink