In Letter To Kennedy And Baucus, Obama Outlines Principles For Health Reform
Following on his meeting earlier this week with Democrats from the Senate Finance and HELP committees (the two committees with jurisdiction over health reform legislation), President Obama has sent a letter to the committees' chairmen--Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) and Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA)--restating his priorities, and committing to some new spending cuts to generate revenue to pay for comprehensive legislation.
You can see the entire letter here, but some of the key points are:
I am committed to working with the Congress to fully offset the cost of health care reform by reducing Medicare and Medicaid spending by another $200 to $300 billion over the next 10 years, and by enacting appropriate proposals to generate additional revenues. These savings will come not only by adopting new technologies and addressing the vastly different costs of care, but from going after the key drivers of skyrocketing health care costs, including unmanaged chronic diseases, duplicated tests, and unnecessary hospital readmissions.To identify and achieve additional savings, I am also open to your ideas about giving
special consideration to the recommendations of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), a commission created by a Republican Congress. Under this approach, MedPAC's recommendations on cost reductions would be adopted unless opposed by a joint resolution of the Congress. This is similar to a process that has been used effectively by a commission charged with closing military bases, and could be a valuable tool to help achieve health care reform in a fiscally responsible way.
Congress has demanded that health reform efforts be deficit neutral--meaning Obama must pay for the initial costs with a combination of efficiency savings and increased taxes or spending cuts. For more on how the MedPAC plan would work, see this post. Much of this ground, apparently, was covered at the meeting--and soon we'll know whether it's the sort of stuff Congress will go for.


















I think the key thing in the letter was the UNAMBIGUOUS support for the public option by the President.
June 3, 2009 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I sure hope Sen Baucus can read that Obama(and the American people) want a public plan choice!
June 3, 2009 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama hasn't fought for it like we thought he would. For that we will have to bombard his office with calls as well.
June 3, 2009 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope this healthcare reform bill doesn't turn into a sop for big pharma. I've been willing to give the President and the majority of Senate members the benefit of the doubt for awhile, but it's looking more and more likely that healthcare reform isn't going to as effective as any of us were hoping it would be. I still have hope that the President will push a public option, but the rumblings about taxes and a "trigger" are definitely concerning me. This is a reassuring letter, but it's still just words, the Senate needs to take action.
June 3, 2009 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brian,
Link missing:
No actual link to any post.
June 3, 2009 6:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm concerned about the focus on cost reduction without an equal commitment to quality healthcare. You can always cut costs by denying care.
June 3, 2009 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
If given the choice between paying for health insurance out of my pocket after taxes or with a reduced pre-tax salary to offset a company provided health benefit, I'd rather direct that payment as additional tax for a universal health care option. Either way I'm still having to fork over money out of my pocket as if it were a premium payment, but with a universal health care plan, I'd have the peace of mind knowing when, not if, I get sick I won't have to decide which bill to float in order to pay for the doctor visit and prescriptions. I just can't figure out what part of the equation Obama and the Democrats don't understand.
June 4, 2009 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink