TPMDC
« Graham: Republicans Have The Leverage To Delay Sotomayor Confirmation | Home | Does Holocaust Museum Shooting Vindicate DHS Report? »

Labor: Chamber Gearing Up For 2010 Senate Fight

Josh already noted this at the Mother Ship this morning, but Politico ran today with a story about the Chamber of Commerce's plans to raise $100 million as part of a campaign to "defend the free market system."

Privately, labor sources describe the move as the Chamber's opening salvo in the committee's campaign to disrupt the balance of power in the Senate--which they view as hostile to business--in the 2010 election. And there's more than just messaging to that--the Chamber's president made that pretty clear.

A public education ad buy defending the free enterprise system is in the works, as well as an issue advocacy program tied to the 2010 midterm elections.

"We're going to hold politicians accountable as we defend and advance economic freedom," [Chamber of Commerce President Tom] Donohue said.

Not entirely coincidentally the SEIU is going live today with a campaign of its own--directed right back at the Chamber.

"Over the next couple of months, you're going to hear from a wide coalition of interests, from small businesses to environmental groups, exposing the U.S. Chamber's assault on common-sense legislation across the board," continued Burger. "We'll never be able to keep up with their spending, but luckily, we'll have the will of every American who believes we should give average workers a dollar raise before we give another CEO a million-dollar bonus."

For now, the campaign features a web ad, aimed at voters in Pennsylvania, Arkansas, Louisiana, Virginia and North Dakota--states with senators who oppose or seek to weaken the Employee Free Choice Act. The ad appears below.


2 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Hmmm. Is the Chamber just playacting, putting on poor-us to distract us from the reality that the U.S. Senate could not be more business-friendly if all the members were appointed by Goldman-Sachs?

Is it trying to protect the Blue Dogs by portraying them as the only things standing between us and communisitic ruin?

Or - be still my heart - is the Chamber's stranglehold on the Bayh-partisans (thank you, Blue Girl) starting to slip?

user-pic

These jerks think they have a monopoly on "free enterprise" just as Dobson, Robertson and associates thought they had a monopoly on Christianity.

In fact, they're the ones who are anti-free enterprise. Adam Smith advocated progressive taxes decades before Karl Marx came along. And contrary to the false assertions of these douchebags, regulation and transparency are fundamental to capitalism and free enterprise.

A plutocracy is what they want, not free enterprise. Rather than getting defensive, we need to educate the public about how a free enterprise system really works and shovel their b.s. back at them.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address