TPMDC
« SEIU's Stern: Contra Sorkin, 'Unionized Companies Are Driving Force In Our Economy' | Home | Sorkin: I Apologize For 'Flip,' 'Unscripted' Comments »

New Hampshire Legislators Finally Get Out The Votes For Gay Marriage

The New Hampshire state House has now passed a gay marriage bill after a misfire two weeks ago, putting this state on the road to full marriage equality.

So what has made the difference? Two weeks ago, I pointed out that this bill had become a case study in get-out-the-vote for a chamber of 400 members. The initial version passed by a 178-167 margin. But Gov. John Lynch (D) wouldn't sign it without expressly codified exemptions for religious institutions that didn't want to participate in gay marriage.

That new version then initially failed by a margin of 188-186 -- owing mainly to marriage opponents doing a better job this time of getting their people to the chamber.

But now the new version has passed 198-176. Marriage-equality supporters took another bite at the apple, ironed out some final language, and picked up those remaining votes they needed.

Late Update: Gov. Lynch has signed the bill, officially legalizing gay marriage in the state of New Hampshire. The new law will take effect January 1, 2010.


4 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Okay, so that's 13.8%, 6.5% and 6.5% of legislators skipping out on what's got to be their highest-profile vote this year. Is it normally this difficult to get state legislators to show up to work? Or are were they just trying to duck responsibility?

I've never before heard of a GOTV effort in a legislature. Am I the only one thinking WTF?

user-pic

NH state legislature members (lower house) only get paid something like $175 a year... they typically have some other things to do

user-pic
But Gov. John Lynch (D) wouldn't sign it without expressly codified exemptions for religious institutions that didn't want to participate in gay marriage.
It's a little pathetic that he "stood tough" to get them to add unnecessary language, but I guess if that's what it takes ...

(There's no way to legally force a religious institution to "participate in" any sort of marriage that they don't want to participate in. That's been long settled wrt mixed-race marriages, etc.)

user-pic

Now in North America there is a dynamic economic zone,,,, New England, Eastern Ontario and Southern Quebec,,,,,, where marriage equality is the law of the land. Add New York, where marriage equality from other states is recognized in law,,,, and soon will pass marriage equality itself seems likely.

Politics does follow economics.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address